You mean regular financial assets like stocks, bonds, gold ,etc? Can you explain further what you mean?when you're managing a moonshot portfolio, think about minimizing your drawdowns by reducing portfolio covariance. e.g. BTC might be a good long term hold and it would be foolish to "sell the dips" if you think it is on a secular rise. However, how does one stomach the interim volatility? By pairing it with other assets. Thinking about it singularly is the wrong approach.
Yes, that's why I have a trading bucket and a hodl bucket. And the trading bucket is bigger than the hodl bucket (something like 65/35). I will let the trading part go once things get overheated in terms of mainstream people and cocktail parties. Now if it goes to 100K, I sell the trading and my hodl goes down to 1K, I can tolerate that, that's the cost of doing business. I will be up so much that losing some hodling is the price I pay. Because there is the chance it will go to 1K but also there is the chance that it will triple from there and then crash but the crash price it will still be higher from when I sold the trading portion. In other words, it will be like selling Qs in 1998 or Japan in 1987 but its even worse because fundamentally, bitcoin might sustain itself in the trillions of market cap one day. So if I sell it all at 100K, then it goes to 250K, then crashes to 130K and grinds and eventually rips to 500K, I might stay out of the whole move because I dont feel like paying up after bailing it all at 100K. I rather risk a drop to 1K then to miss a move up I didnt predict.I don't mean to the downside @Daal I mean the upside. We are both bullish so great if BTC hits 100k. What if it goes down to 1K at some point after hitting 100K? That's not a good HODL. Hence the Imperial Palace.
Sure in the short term if BTC hits 5K that's an even greater buy, we aren't discussing price targets however, but path dependency. I love a dip when bullish but at some point we all have to sell.