Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...
- Thread starter charts
- Start date
This is the log that was mentiioned.
as you see itis the open and annotating was unter way.
A trade was taken and covered as noted.
There are an additional few columns on the left.
The three platforms mentioned and used are TN MC and the trading platform.
As you see the YM leads the ES in terms of the cases and their series of mutations to their final stae near the end of the bar.
This illustration takes us to how trading fits into the MADA its logging, and using the trading platform. You also can see how logging has a vocabulary for each column. The MC is automated and its use is on a core with four shells of trading and it has seven panes arranged vertically. Many snagits of it have been posted in the past. 31 colors are used a lites and they perfom two functions: signals and filtiering. Most all of these as from leading "indicators" for both filtering and signalling. Approximately 1600 Excel lines are used to convey the logic for the coding.
The log shows a complete pattern on the fractal being used.
for the convenience of those who may wish to "read" the log, below is a set of comments on the trade and how the log supports trading.
What is shown is the opening entry a cover and the rentry arrow where the window ends for the period of change. the log tapers off in detail as I am viewing the DOM on the thrid platform where the partials fills ripple into filling the position.
We sacrifice the opportunity for anyone to "read" the log on thier own to gleen the value of how the four parts of the compilations filings work together. All merge on the log's record.
My logs have been referred to as crap, meaning they are uninformativeand poorly done in terms of mt handwriting. The writing is dine quickly and succinctly to convey the essence of the market's operation. I depend upon the context row below row represents. The left to right order is significant for reading and it is NOT done left to right for writing. It is done from the mifddle out for writing. I fill it in from memory once the "second" is noted. In other works I sweep and take a data set. There is NO concentration on the screens and doing feakout single signal reactive work as in OODA trading.
M is an annotating V and P activity. Logging is where ADA happens and it happens when NOT looking at the screen.
My mice are widely separated and I use several screens and computers. My hands are like you feet for driving a manual transission car or tractor trailer. My rigs of choice corporatewise wee MAC puppy dogs with tandem rear ends, all forest green. I used an add and drop trailer (70) modus.
I swivel in a 68cm arc to save neck muscle exertion. My screens are roted 90 degrees so they are tall and focussed on NOW with a lot of futre showing projected annotation. three or four moves are always anticipated so it is as if there is a phantom present where thinking takes place that is well thethe right of the NOW. I may make notes over there with line segments that are color coded.
So logging is just the rows of MADA that are in the non stationarity window that is the whole world for the instruments being handled.
THE ESSENTIAL TRADE SHOWING IS A POINT TO POINT. on the BBT.
(point 3 to the ftt of the accelerated parallelogram.) It is 1/25th of a day, meaning the trading rate is @ 25 trades a day. I begin the next trade @ the bottom of the page.
On the initial rows you see me getting in the groove and getting dominance straight.
@ the end of ber 3 and the beginning of bar 4 you see the YM peel off ahead of the ES and I am hitting T to handle the open.
I observe the dom , non dom and dom as time passes.
during the interval on bar 6 between 196 and 107 seconds ( a long time) the stitch forms out of an original sym R/R on the YM.
The ES is lagging the YM so on bar 7 the ES goes to its traverse limit in the accelerated parallelogram.
I cover on the opening of the first chance/secondchance window (See SKO). the Arrow in the margin shows the second chance ending and I am settled in for the day having switched sides of the market. Note the FTT appeared in the window and near the end of the window. this begins the pt1 to pt2 trade, Volume delcines and then accelerates as the RTL of accelerated parallelogram is broken.
So the log appears to older traders as tape reading; it is. But the expressions in the log are the MADA orientation to displays that are now available and which have since replaced the tape sort of. The DOM and TS are still there. I use the right margin for noting significant Walls and such.
The Premium to me is a cardinal indicator. the finalcial industry is still locked into not using the premium in significantstat ways. It is still brute force floor level thinking. the premium column is labeled S/S which stands for a library script that deals with the cash/ index relationship on a OTR level basis. The relationship to the premium is done in first and second derivatives. Derivatives is what the MC indicators is all about. the two functions in indicators are done in terms of binary vectors. A vector by its nature is a derivative. It is pretty lcear that detractors are very unfamiliar with vectors and how they are binarily oriented.
I have ben brief in the comments on the log, maybe. the log mostly described going from point 3 to an FTT in one sheet. you see the order of events in each column and you see the relationships of the columns and the CONTEXT groups of rows provide.
The mind is built by doing drills each column is a drill. groups of columns are drills. groups of rows are context drills.
the mind gets organized by aligning the subconscious and conscious short term memories. from that the inference of the mind is organized and ultimately, through answering self generated questions, the mind is fully differentiated.
I have been stepping into that process with many many drills and they have generated questions where I provided more drills. the pupose being to get k200 up and running as a PEP and it applications, application.
Notes were compiled under four categories and each has subheadings. A vast storehouse of information has accreued over the last fifty years. It is all on the same topic.
here are some tweaks on your chart. I focussed on justthe portion needing tweaking. It is annotated th my cmments as part of the M of MADA rule set.
We can see that DAx is a good index to trade with SCT. thanks for filling in the third portion of the 24/7.
Thank you Jack, I appreciate it. I have a question regarding the completeness of the patterns. On the channel fractal level, one has to let the three traverses complete before one looks for FTT of the channel. This FTT corresponds to the ftt of the third traverse of this channel which in turn corresponds to the ftt of the third tape of this traverse a so on. Now if after the FTT the market builds non dom and than dom traverse leading to fanning of the channel, one will have 5 traverses in that channel. Now what would that mean for the annotations before the last 2 traverses? Were they incorrect? In such a case our 1-2-3 pattern appears to be unable to complete the pattern? Where is my thinking flawed? TIA.
Thank you for the thoughtful questions.
Getting the patterns rolling could be done with designed drills that would use collections of bars that would introduce corrolary after corrolary. this progression would alllow a critical path method. An alternative is to use nested fractaals where different influences comes into play in different ways.
You are doing a good job and so sets of questions appear that take us to the next level of itirative refinement. ET is a rich data sourse for how people progress in using experience for knowledge and skills acquisition. The story of emotional grow is there to see as well.
A pattern can be expanded, accelerated or made less robust by fanning.
We considered how the next faster fractal is the most influential during each of its moves.
A simple condition would be a market in balance and no or very few externalities affecting it. regularly scheduled economitc or econometric news does provide pertibations occasionally. Three moves characterize such before the damping occurs to return to the pre news modus. Damping comes in three sizes: critical, over and under. Wave synthesis or regression analysis is often handy for grasping the asymptotic nature od the damping.
you set the scene correctly for your questions:
"Now what would that mean for the annotations before the last 2 traverses? Were they incorrect? In such a case our 1-2-3 pattern appears to be unable to complete the pattern? Where is my thinking flawed? TIA."
The terminology you use is the heirarchy we have been following for several years in ET. A channel is the slow outer envelope and it has the pattern traverses within it. This is a complete pattern of the moves of the channel in traverses. The channel is complete.
IT CAN ONLY BE ADDED TO BY FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS OF A FUTURE, LIKE LEVEL, PROCESS OF FORMATION.
Here, pragmatically, we are adding to the DAX record moves on all fractals. we use the monitoring rules. of MADA. This post clarifies and adds some rules for tweaking theexisting rules. (there is acommmon criticism of me that I keep changing the rules or keep adding rules. This perception based criticism is well founded in the context of the experience of the critique. But it terms of knowledge and skills acquisition, it is just simply something the critique is not experiencing. He is stuck and seeing "more than before"; thats all.
If a pattern completes and the RTL and LTL are not approached by price; then the pattern expands to include more traverses within the boundaries of the channel container. trading goes along and dominance is maintained as the trend continues and when non dominance occurs, ther is an anticipation that the RTL could be broken and clean page 4 applies as a new channel begins its first traverse as non dom becomes dom @ the BO of the RTL.
Q1. "Now what would that mean for the annotations before the last 2 traverses?
there are several partial answers that make up the whole answer.
The FTT of the channel is in and move 1 takes us long and it is successful in trms of the regions of clean page 4. these regions were determined, then profferred subsequently as part of iterative refinement tooling. In ATS terms this is a signal filter which gated a signal forward for making money.(namely taking the move 1 (traverse) profit segment (or keeping point to point trading persmissable of faster fractals)). Cod9ing to take the market's offer is not possible using stats and the financial industry has proven inductively over and over and over.
Upon this long traverse completion, we begin another to be successful traverse. This means we are well into the long new channel.
The long new channel has limitations of several sorts. The one that forms (one leg of an OR circuit input in logic) is that a long cannot be a long if the RTL has a negative slope. Slopes have three conditions: +. - and neutral. Plus and neutral work together for a slope following a short sloped completion. (and vice versa).
This failure of the long is seen with price crossing the green.
As a result, serveral housekeeping rules go into effect to allow us to be current. If the long it over, then what is next? What is next is doing expansion of the prior short. We are folding all bars after the FTT of the short into the short channel to allow us to find the "NEW FTT" of the short channel.
Traverse 1 (a long traverse qualified by its regional success of having its point 2 outside for the RTL of the short channel). So we "bring it back into the short channel" by fanning the RTL to the FTT of the move 1 traverse. That means we adjust the LTL from existing point 2 to the short channel. If the FTT interfers we make it the "new point 2 which is just before the new point 3 of the fanned RTL. This shows how non stationarity could enter the picture.
A intellectual note occurs here: When a person is growing he considers growth instead of any other alternative. He recognizes the additions of inference which is being inserted in the sparsely populated areas of his differentiation.
I used an example of natives first seeing Columbus and his three ships. They had to add to their inference, the sensing elements they recieved through sight and sound. It definitely was reinforced over and over and over in their "growth". Though the Templars ,Columbus had a map with the hooked X that was used by his predecessors.so he knew about natives of the Western hemisphere. The Templars had been to Minnesota before Columbus set sail and they had communicated this to their organized system of which he was a part. Natives had not, however, so Columbus and his ships were unknowns.
Handling unknowns does not bring up right or wrong. It brings up potential growth. In a cycle we found out how a person could not see tops but he could see bottoms. It is possible to not overcome a difficulty and, instead, do a workaround. Workarounds, as we know, often destroy differentiation permanently.
By updating at the time of the long channel failure, we safely and competently return to the short channel to get a new FTT and recommence building a long channel after that. this is called the order of events.
A new RTL and LTL wre drawn to include the move 1 long traverse in the prior short channel. Our M rules of MADA routine make this automatic from now on as a consequence of new additional inference being placed where it belongs in our market knowledge and skills differentiation.
continued...
the continuation....
Q2 Were they incorrect?
No, as shown above.
Q3 In such a case our 1-2-3 pattern appears to be unable to complete the pattern?
It was completed and we began work on the subsequent moves of a long channel. What happened was the the long channel failed to complete all of its three traverses. We have the measures; Where How, Why, What and When. This is you focus as you do MADA. The limits of the new long channel were reached and exceeded. By always considering the limits of any forming pattern, you are home free in successful trading without ever having any drawdowns nor the need to set stops nor the need for preventive financial management as seen in OODA and the CW of the financial industry. Building the mind is a rational deductive process. Irtis well known that induction is not part of the scientific method. Not using science, superceeded science based upon a NEED of these type people. They defrauded themselves by using induction. You can see in the history of the financial industry how money creates a mental orientaion of "the rules do not apply to me". You can read in ET how and when intellectual reason escapes a member. Going to incoherence is a path for those who use induction. Going to coherence is made possible by using science which involves deduction only.
Q4. Where is my thinking flawed?
I see no flaws. What I see is competently formed questions that come from your quest to complete you differentiation of your mind. you are becoming more amd more coherent and many pieces have been fit together. this has happened and now you are polishing your differentiation.
You see ther were more limited reched by the annotations provided to you. I didn't clutter the chart with the stuff I typed here. the consequence was that you askedQ's that deal with these matters. Yuo get the benfits of your posting annotated charts and questions. this makes for earnest growth.
As you see the trading becomes smoother and smoother and stops and limited application of capital go into the rear view mirror. Stops and limiting money mangement are substitutes for undifferentiated minds. In this thread we have three instruments that work extemely well with PEP and its applications. Certainly an organization can be build to trade the same capital 24/7 and only in RTH an with full automatic degapping.
Certainty and sufficiency prevail and there is no nondective applications like stats or propabilistic information theory. this is all caste via three theories: logic, paradigm and information theory (non probabilistic only) OODA and CW do not occupy anyof this territory since they operate based upon "the rules do not apply". Art becomes science as a consequence of intellectual prowess that involves taking the higher road and always following the rules.
You are working on a very coherent level; recognize this and allow yourself to trust yourself. Let it gel into unconscious competence; it is a lovely place.
Q2 Were they incorrect?
No, as shown above.
Q3 In such a case our 1-2-3 pattern appears to be unable to complete the pattern?
It was completed and we began work on the subsequent moves of a long channel. What happened was the the long channel failed to complete all of its three traverses. We have the measures; Where How, Why, What and When. This is you focus as you do MADA. The limits of the new long channel were reached and exceeded. By always considering the limits of any forming pattern, you are home free in successful trading without ever having any drawdowns nor the need to set stops nor the need for preventive financial management as seen in OODA and the CW of the financial industry. Building the mind is a rational deductive process. Irtis well known that induction is not part of the scientific method. Not using science, superceeded science based upon a NEED of these type people. They defrauded themselves by using induction. You can see in the history of the financial industry how money creates a mental orientaion of "the rules do not apply to me". You can read in ET how and when intellectual reason escapes a member. Going to incoherence is a path for those who use induction. Going to coherence is made possible by using science which involves deduction only.
Q4. Where is my thinking flawed?
I see no flaws. What I see is competently formed questions that come from your quest to complete you differentiation of your mind. you are becoming more amd more coherent and many pieces have been fit together. this has happened and now you are polishing your differentiation.
You see ther were more limited reched by the annotations provided to you. I didn't clutter the chart with the stuff I typed here. the consequence was that you askedQ's that deal with these matters. Yuo get the benfits of your posting annotated charts and questions. this makes for earnest growth.
As you see the trading becomes smoother and smoother and stops and limited application of capital go into the rear view mirror. Stops and limiting money mangement are substitutes for undifferentiated minds. In this thread we have three instruments that work extemely well with PEP and its applications. Certainly an organization can be build to trade the same capital 24/7 and only in RTH an with full automatic degapping.
Certainty and sufficiency prevail and there is no nondective applications like stats or propabilistic information theory. this is all caste via three theories: logic, paradigm and information theory (non probabilistic only) OODA and CW do not occupy anyof this territory since they operate based upon "the rules do not apply". Art becomes science as a consequence of intellectual prowess that involves taking the higher road and always following the rules.
You are working on a very coherent level; recognize this and allow yourself to trust yourself. Let it gel into unconscious competence; it is a lovely place.