Getting down and dirty is where the rubber meets the road ...

The fast fractal is set as seen on this illustration.

New members (elements) are noted.

attachment.php


Some of these are faster than the fast fractal of K200 so the H2 and its X are held through to NOT jump fractals.

when bar volume has parts gong in different directions these are considered as relative sizes in a ratio and proportionally weighted by time duration. this is just a mental activity that is simple and undmanding and in a context of being "inside" the observable fractals.

It is possible, according to skills, to reason through why a bar is NOT an ftt or IS an ftt.

Here I have spelled that out for you.

I also threw in some dots where I can reasaonably assume the reader remembrs something from the prior illustration in terms of finite set one to one relations.

Drills are what builds the mind. What is in the mind are one to one relations and the rules of each of the four parts of MADA.

AS you see we had over the range on two tradss on bar 1 and we loxked in profits@ pt 3 and took more than the range expansiion in profits in this illustration. The range has tripled and we are still 2 a multiple of the whole range in profit taking.

So far in the day we have 1 move in on the trading fractal To complete the trading fractal has three moves. A beginner would trade the trading fractal FTT to FTT. So he is short and 1/3 of the way through a trade and he has made in unrealized profits about the daily range. He is focussed on annotating in order to see the parallelogram of the trading fractal. Do you see it? NO IT IS STILL UNSEEN IN TERMS OF ANNOTATIONS.
 

Attachments

the trades in this illustration are fairly common and as you see market PACE is slipping lower.

the advent of yellows means we are fanning for each and chacking to see if new ftt's occur. when they do we know to reverse on them and swet up the beginning of a new move on the various appropriate fractals.

we start to learn by thoroughly annotating. We keep track of the mutations of the forming bar and relate that the the time when the H! and H2 are applying.

Most of the time we are in H1 and that is the C time where profits are accumulating.

So at this point you have about all of the members usually used in expert trading to know that you know and to always be on the correct side of the market.

what I did was use the glossary of logging to go through the stages of seeing H! come to a close and H2 come into play.

attachment.php


as you see trading is fairly leisurely since most of the time you are just extracting the market's offer.

for several bars we go throught the repition of staying on the correct side of the market and handling the opening movement of the market according to a short Sentiment of the market.

the range expasion slows and pairs of trades keep adding to the multiple of the daily range.

Over 10 days ago we embarked on fast tracking annotating those days. then we logged all the annotations to see three levels of fractals nested using just EOB cases. Had that been done then trading would have become a natural routine using MADA.

We also could have been doing ES and the DAX daily to buld the mind by doing drills.

I can imagine what it is like for persons who do induction instead of deduction with binary vectors. Their minds become scrambled eggs aftr a while.
 

Attachments

trading is not a chicken and egg thing.

It is a deductive process (and NOT inductive AT ALL) where the MADA routine replaces the traditional CW's OODA "betting" routine.

the rules of the routine, when used, grow the mind by adding inference which becomes organized as differentiation. It is identical to the process of learn to drive a car and driving a car with varying degrees of skill. Most people can do trading or driving as a "unconscious competence IF THEY PUT IN THE WORK OF THE DRILLS.

Most people are just too smart to do drills to learn to trade.

MADA is used all the time and repeated cycles take place during a bar. All trades are based on the one to one correspondence of the elements of the finite sets of each stage of MADA. You are always in a parallelogram which acts as a container of the cases of the adjacent bars. The forming bar slowly mutates from case to case. The bar also goes to limits of the parallelograms.

I would say most people cannot even reason through why the use of parallelograms. This comes under the heading of mental laziness.

So in this thread up to now I have departed from our normal approach of suggesting that people reason their way to success by doing critical thinking. So far we have done what people do in a geometry class which is deductive reasoning. Why cannot trading become more difficult than scholastic level education? Market granularity of instruments and market participation context answer the question as to why such simplicity.

As you see their is now quite a bit to the sophisitcation of the "betting" of the financial industry. The cspan hearings under four topics shows us all how the undrpinnings of the industry is sales and marketing.

The humor of the securitization of derivatives all comes down to the irrationality of betting and protecting bets. The CEO of GS only got a 9 million dollar bonus on his salary and perks and options.

GS proved the instruments became illiquid and M to M was just a way to keep near "home".... lol

The retail trader can handle 1...10... 50.... 100.... 500 contracts trading with SCT as a intermediate level trader. There is nothing too difficult about doing partial fills as the contract sizing increases above intermediate.

I think the speed of price in markets is relatively slow compared to the human mind doing a routine.

The question of when to do a trade is told to you by the market. there is a window that opens, remains open and closes. You can do the trade or partial fills all during that time. Refer to past posts of prints that show the succession of partial fills in the window.
 
The short, long, short probably do not seem reasonable to most traders.

The reasons they have for not accepting where the ellipses are placed have to do with their "perception".

what most of these people would do is trade with entries and exits. They continually feel like doing a trade at a time and that means they "enter" and then they "exit". They get to the sidelines and have a sense of relief. These people are usually freaked out all during the "hold" of any entry after their entry.

If a person is still "stuck with entry/exit" they would feel even worse risking reversing on the first FTT they came to. They are not going to do that (link trades).

What happens after the exit is that the person is missing the next long and he is going to just sit there on the sidelines for a good portion of the day. Then he is going to fake himself out and have a losing long entry/exit trade. this givves up some previously earned profits.

If a person takes the long as a quick reentry after taking profits, then he is not going to trade the moves within the long and he is going to come closer and closer to the GREEN point of failure of the long. He washes. and recounts to himself that he sat there at "risk" as the trade didn't work out.

On this day you want to pin me down on the beginner trades; I put in what is possible for a beginner to do. But it is still not reasonable to mostly anyone that choosing the last green new FTT is something that a person could do. After all, what makes the last FTT different than all the rest?

Suppose he knows. Suppose he doesn't know. As it turns out there are two groups of people that could fall into these categories.

If you think about it, hows does a person go from one category to another?

The answer to most trading questions is the same. Answers are found by earnestly acquiring skills through doing drills.

Once I wrote down 10 pages of stuff for a person to look at on the YM to help him trade the ES. There was a page four. When it was redone on a graphic pane, it became clean page 4. When a person uses clean page 4, he is in the group that knows and no longer in the group that doesn't know.

So up until that time, most beginners cannot take the step to do reversal trading simply out of fear of something or other. Actually, you see that throughout the industry all the way up and past GS, everyone mostly trades as a simplton using induction.

At some point, the thinking process deals scientifically. there in this world, things are done in a way to gets results that forward the science at hand. A person does not have to use science if he chooses to be other than purposeful or earnest. these two things are the shortest distance between two points.

WWT happened as an application of the null hypothesis.

One aspect of life is having immunity to the behavior of others. That is where PEP and its applications came from. Extracting capital out of pools is done regardless of others in any way.

How much depends upon the mind's growth.

The deal for making money is to have a differentiated mind. I certainly cheated by creating tooling that was just pragmatic and efficient too. But on the other hand, it was worth taking the deductive process down to the granularity of the markets. This eliminated noise and anomalies.

It did not require going past scholastic math. And there is no requirement for speedy computers to make money by taking all of the market's offer.
 

Attachments

Jack, thank you for taking so much time to give us another glimpse in the way you see the market.

Those circles on the beginner chart, and your MADA sets are obvious to your differentiated mind, so you can carve the best turning points just choosing if you do it at beginner, advanced or expert level.

In asking you about the trading points I was looking for two things:

2. Getting a feeling of where on those best bars (previous bar BO, bar open, sub or tape RTL BO, etc.), or the earliest subsequent bar after the optimum one, would you hit T if your mind were less differentiated and you didn't see the optimum points.

1. Getting recommendations for specific drills to help in further differentiating my mind when dealing with the P,V based MADA.
 
Quote from charts:

Jack, thank you for taking so much time to give us another glimpse in the way you see the market.

Those circles on the beginner chart, and your MADA sets are obvious to your differentiated mind, so you can carve the best turning points just choosing if you do it at beginner, advanced or expert level.

In asking you about the trading points I was looking for two things:

2. Getting a feeling of where on those best bars (previous bar BO, bar open, sub or tape RTL BO, etc.), or the earliest subsequent bar after the optimum one, would you hit T if your mind were less differentiated and you didn't see the optimum points.


A while back SKO asked about how long there was to do a trade.we termed the period as one that ran from the first chance to the last chance (second chance).

It may not b apparent to people watching the market, that there are many levels to trade on. For the beginner level on k200, trading on the thading fractal was the suggested approach.

So the "best bars" are those WHERE the end of the move from pt3 to FTT are where to look. Specifically it is WHERE you are coming into an FTT on the trading fractal. IT could be a new FTT as we saw occurs.

To do this you can set up a check off list to get you to that place. You do not trade until you get the that place; you just hold.

So You can make the checkoff brief if you don't like to do very much to make money.

The condition just before an FTT on the trading fractal is when the trading fractal is past the pt3 and, on the fast fractal the thrid move is under way and id also dominant as is the pt 3 to FTT.

This means you draw horizontal lines on the volume chart and look for a higher volume than before on the trade. Exit or reverse at that time.

"higher volume than before" is not too difficult to use as a trading rule. I do not use trading rules but you really want to use trading rules. My alternative is to use MADA rules and the fact of doing M A D A is a way to really make all that the market offers once your mind has been built. No one really wants to build thier minds so they can trade in a manner similar to driving a car.

Now, the second part of your request. You miss the "higher volume than before" you will notice that you are in a period AFTER an FTT and AFTER the end of the thrird fast fractal move. when you notice that then do the trade. This can be 1, 2 3 bars later but you still have many many bars in the time zone that follows to begin to seek to find a higher bar than before that is the end of the profit segment you ae now in.

this generation is referred to as the "sandwich generation". young adults are getting P and J sandwiches form their parents after college days have passed. So this post is a P and J sandwich post for this type of person with this mind set.

An FTT was invented as a trend ending event. Mentally, the market is dominant; volume is peaking and the price movement cannot make it across a parallelogran from one side to the other. Annotations show this not happening. Thus the trend has ended and the overlap of the next trend begins after the peak. This movement is non dominant decreasing volume, relative to prior circumstances. At BO of rtl and RTL these two events, lead to increasing volume on each fractal sucessively (unseen to most as BO's and as volume troughs to peaks beginning).

My comments are what is happening and they have a name as determined by people who cannot "read the market" but belive they can. (See clancy for example). Reading the market presumes a reading vocabulary. Children spend a long time (relativley speaking) working through gaining vocabularies in two forms: sound and sight. Sound comes first and sight is added when they acquires the symbols of the alphabet and the understanding of forming words and the understanding of forming snetences and paragraphs, etc...

PA trading is the "run dick run " level of reading. Indicators are just formed words.

In SCT, the concept of sentences appears as the same as sentences: an expression of a complete thought. SCT uses the "order of events" as sentences. Here you know you know WHERE you are, WHAT is next and how fast the order of events is going along.

A W or M day is like four paragraphs.

An ftt or FTT is like the end of a sentence and the pattern expresses a complete thought.

You questions are like questions on syntax and sentence structure.

you may be able to see that "Trend Following" as a book is an empty book. It says nothing about trend following at all.



1. Getting recommendations for specific drills to help in further differentiating my mind when dealing with the P,V based MADA.

Copy this thread and put it into a three ring binder. It is about 350 pages, I am told.

Get some tabs and use color to code references. Do drill rferences in blue. Number thenm in the order of there appearance from 1 onward.

Pick four more colors for tabs. Use one color each for M A D and A rules.

One the top of the pages, divide the horizontal space into four parts. Use tabs labeled with four different roman numerals to tap the four parts: I Market, II trader, III carryover, and IV Making Money.

Set up three other three ring binders and do the ES, k200 and DAX, completely every day satring 10 days backform when you start.

for some of the seminal drills attach the results in such a way that you can fold the results into the binder by putting the result on a blank page to the left of the result. This means you can fold out (like in Playboy) a result for reference as you do work. In fact several can be folded out.

What is basically going on is you are learning to read like you learned to read as a child. At that time it was easy to do since that is what minds do at that age. as a teenager you learned doto do deduction is a classroom and it was easy at that time as well.

Today you are taller and heavier, at least and everything is harder or impossible to do as a learner. Your brain is mostly unused today since it was never filled up with anything.

reading filled up many small spaces or regions. Traders do not go about filling their heads with the equivalent categories of things that children do when they are told to as they learn to read.

Your 350 or so pages will have hundreds of tabs on the side and top. In adding them you discover that the information was given to you with directions for gatting it into your brain as a mindful experience. this is the 30 annaversary of "mindfulness" as a science. It inventor has persona;lly congratulate the group of people who established one of two locations in Tucson for mindfulness. Both buildings are owned by one of the Tucson traders. The first is for learning mindfullness in the context of being cured of PTSD for veterans. the second is simplya large trading room where our group beginning this week each have tradingstations. It is on two levels: teachers and students. teachers learned over the last few months and now they are teaching a new wave of Tucsonans to get ready to teach a new wave this Fall. Teaching is really "supporting learning". Sunday meetings and Thursday lunches and prepping the Universe and doing IAS's and logging and debriefing were not sufficient. Doing trading in a common space works out better.


As you see this post is just a repeat of prior posts and it has a "do it yourself" tabbing exercise (drill on how learning works) so what has been posted can become useful.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

So the "best bars" are those WHERE the end of the move from pt3 to FTT are where to look. Specifically it is WHERE you are coming into an FTT on the trading fractal. IT could be a new FTT as we saw occurs.

To identify the trading fractal FTT it is necessary to know that one is drawing correctly the three faster fractals (dom, non-dom, dom), so that one can know that one is travelling from pt3 to FTT. This clearly requires the correct grouping of bars in accordance with a convention that uses the 9 cases. Although we treat internals as “one bar”, some guidance, with examples, would be welcome for how to handle sequential internals. E.g. the bars following 10:50 and 12:25

And a couple of questions:

Q1. On the attached chart, are the thick dashed containers “faster fractals” or “trading fractals”?

Q2. Having identified the FTT at 15:10 I was expecting a long container, but the 15:40 bar (labelled “oops”) went lower than my p1. Would this have been a case of simply reversing to get on the correct side (with a small loss) or was there something to suggest that 15:10 was not an FTT?
 

Attachments

Hi dkm,

is there a specific reason why you put the FTTs where you put them on your charts? Or why are those visible but not others?

In your example I see that you drew the down container starting from 15.25 but you didn't label the bar at that time as an FTT of your black container which started at 15.10. Your "oops" bar seems to be the break out bar of that black container.

Greetings.
 
Quote from frenchfry:

Hi dkm,

is there a specific reason why you put the FTTs where you put them on your charts? Or why are those visible but not others?

In your example I see that you drew the down container starting from 15.25 but you didn't label the bar at that time as an FTT of your black container which started at 15.10. Your "oops" bar seems to be the break out bar of that black container.

Greetings.
I have adjusted the FTT positions on the attached chart. If you think that there are more then perhaps you could post a chart.

The problem with the container starting at 15:10 is that it didn't appear to have dom-nondom-dom moves before price began the short container from 15:25.
 

Attachments

Back
Top