obviously those with good insurance or money have access to the best healtcare in the world here in the U.S. ... or very close to the top.
The problems come in when the govt gets involved and supports insurance industries and drug companies while pretending to help americans.
there should simply be a hybrid system.
single payer or vouchers for base care for all... and we can supplement the rest through private insurance or cash.
The problems come in when the govt gets involved and supports insurance industries and drug companies while pretending to help americans.
there should simply be a hybrid system.
single payer or vouchers for base care for all... and we can supplement the rest through private insurance or cash.
I would think that you of all people would understand that no one who thinks clearly -- and I think you do think pretty clearly, and that's what's surprising me about your post -- would use an anecdote of a wealthy Arab coming to the U.S. for medical care as an indicator of the quality of care available here. Unless of course you were measuring the quality of care available to rich Arabs, The Trumps or the Rockefellers. It is understood by most people that when you speak of the quality of any service without additional qualifiers you are speaking of what's true in general. Not only is the quality of care available in the U.S. among the worst of any modern developed nation by any standard measure, but it is by far the most expensive. Put those two things together and you have a disaster. Perhaps you also think that medical costs being the main cause of bankruptcies in the U.S. shouldn't be a concern. If you do, that might go a long way in helping the rest of us understand why nothing has been done about this sad situation, i.e., too many think as you do.
Last edited: