QE can be used to increase the supply of money balanced against debt. But not directly. In the present example the money went essentially two places -- into bank reserves (money in reserves , by definition, is not in circulation), and into the Treasury to be used to fund various economic stimula. In the later case the inflationary effect was balanced by the recession to an extent that negligible net inflation resulted. Do not forget that QE is a reversible process, whereas actual money printing is not (well, I suppose you could burn the money you print. THAT would reverse itHey, pie.
That article that was referenced at wiki about qe says in the first paragraph that the goal of qe is to increase money supply and then later in the body of the article its says that one of the federal reserve governors is quoted as saying it is monetizing the debt.
So we have wiki and a federal reserve gov and portfolio managers and investors and short term traders and ET denizens all calling it printing and monetizing.
And on the other side we've got a writer from bloomberg, who probably has a degree in journalism, saying it's not.
Guess which one piezoe considers to be the authoritative source.
![]()
.)Two things I could suggest: one is to read the entire Wiki article, carefully, the other is to read Thomas Piketty's nice book.
Last edited: