Geometry In Trading
- Thread starter tradingjournals
- Start date
Most literature on trading is oriented to geometry.
An acorn was dropped by a revered oak tree.
The oak tree rustled its leaves to teach it's offspring to be curious and study the facts.
Finally one morning after a huge dew and the fog burning off, and in the morning sunlight, the offspring said to his revered mom:"Gee I'm a tree." He later learned he was an oak without asking.
You start a lot of threads. Were you dropped out of a tree by a careless unrevered mother?
I like trading triangles, rectangles, and H&s, they are just basic shapes really. I don't use anything past 5th grade math. The shapes just out line boundaries where participants have transacted and where participants will likely be in the money or in pain. I watch how price acts, supply and demand, at these boundaries. However, Entries are only a small piece of the whole puzzle.
http://books.google.com/books?id=1F...ystem Design and Automation rectangle&f=false
not sure what's there to discuss.. S\R are as basic geometry as it gets. a damn straight line
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discussion
i see no discussion coming from OP. just bunch of question,that can be easily answered by using google search. next question most like will be-does it work?
to get into discussion you have to do something to get the results. something, that we can discuss. code that rectangle from the book above,come back with your findings and we will have some discussion that might benefit some of us..
imo-one should come to forum and ask people(who have to spend their own precious time just to type a damn answer for strangers) only if he spend some time on research and\or unable to find the answer on his own. think of it as a last place to ask,not first.
i doubt that OP spend even 10 minutes some place else,googling,looking for an answers. and i have problem with that,because i don't like lazy people or people,who are looking for a shortcuts at expense of others.
that 'geometry trading' OP was talking about is a typical part of every book about technical analysis
i guess it's too hard for him to type 3 damn words- (technical analysis trading) either in amazon or google books and spend some time reading thru the titles and content.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref...nical+analysis+trading&ie=UTF8&qid=1383490046
Here is an interesting discussion I came across years ago on the topic:
http://forum.esignal.com/showthread.php?4328-Fibo-amp-Geometry
http://forum.esignal.com/showthread.php?4328-Fibo-amp-Geometry
Quote from Bob111:
http://books.google.com/books?id=1F...ystem Design and Automation rectangle&f=false
not sure what's there to discuss.. S\R are as basic geometry as it gets. a damn straight line
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discussion
i see no discussion coming from OP. just bunch of question,that can be easily answered by using google search. next question most like will be-does it work?
to get into discussion you have to do something to get the results. something, that we can discuss. code that rectangle from the book above,come back with your findings and we will have some discussion that might benefit some of us..
Do me a favor, and put me on ignore. Also your assumptions about me are false, which are then useful to me to conclude about the content of your posts. An important right question is more important than 100s of my answers, because it leads to different original answers from different people. So if you start threads, I will read your questions if they are important questions. But if you give some answers they may not not be of value to me, because I know you made wrong assumptions about me.