gays

Quote from omegapoint:

Why even bother talking to these primitives.

You make a very good point.

Technically:

Those who are born again and have a regenerate spirit ... or the Spirit of Christ ...

Technically we are not the same type of creature as those who do not.

2 Cor 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. KJV

This makes them the next evolution of mankind per se and the previous is primitive in comparison.

I find your comment more of a mirror judgment of your own condition.


Perhaps these precepts are best illustrated in the following scriptures:

Matt 7:1-6
"Judge not, that you be not judged.
For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.
And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?
Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me remove the speck from your eye'; and look, a plank is in your own eye?
Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.
NKJV
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

No, I'm not homo,nor bi-sexual. I just understand the human mind. Do you believe pedophiles are born that way? Or do they first entertain the thought of sex with kids? What about people that have sex with animals? Are they born that way too?
No, people doesn't become pedophile by entertaining the thought of sex with kids. The reasons for pedophilia is much more complex. It has to do, I think, with a complete lack of development of sexuality all together. I believe this is why there's a disproportionate amount of pedophile catholic priests; they develop some natural foundation for sex at a very young age, until they reach an age in which they're able to completely suppress any sexual thoughts. When they get older, at some point in life they get overwhelmed by this undeveloped urge for sex, and as the only sexual foundation they have is that of a 9 year old boy, the victims are typically boys of that age.

This is fundamentally different from homosexuality; the problem with pedophiles is not in what thoughts they are entertaining, but rather the suppression of sexual thoughts during the most crucial years of sexual development. Homosexuals develop their sexuality as straight people do, they simply have a different starting point.

The mind is a powerful thing. You can program to think any way you want with enough thought.
Your Freudian theories about homosexuality are outdated and completely useless today. The Royal College of Psychiatrists stated in 2007 that:
"Despite almost a century of psychoanalytic and psychological speculation, there is no substantive evidence to support the suggestion that the nature of parenting or early childhood experiences play any role in the formation of a person’s fundamental heterosexual or homosexual orientation. It would appear that sexual orientation is biological in nature, determined by a complex interplay of genetic factors and the early uterine environment. Sexual orientation is therefore not a choice."
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Submission to the Church of England.pdf

You can litterally make yourself fall in love with anyone in the world if you think about them positively long enough. This logic works with everything including sex.
Positive and negative association is very powerful, but it's not all-powerful as you claim, it only works to some degree. You might be able to suppress erotic thoughts about men for most of the time, and if you're bisexual, you'll probably get through life just fine. However, if you're homosexual, you have to convince yourself that females makes you happy and titties are hot. You might even be able to get it up once in a while by learning to be comfortable around your wife (people do get it up when they're alone), but the fact of the matter remains; you'll have a lot of problems getting it up when its time for that special birthday gift from the wife. When that happens, you'll most probably convince yourself that such problems are normal for your age and it can happen to anybody. Well it's not normal, and it's no way to live your life.

If you focus on some dudes ass and how good you might feel if you tried it...you will turn gay with enough thought. Its just how the mind works.
It's not that simple. First of all, how do you explain homosexuality amongst animals with this theory? Does the animals entertain the wrong thoughts? It doesn't make any sense.

And Second, straight guys doesn't choose to entertain thoughts about the female body, a deep interest for it is just always there. It is this interest that directs the thoughts we entertain, not the other way around. For straight guys, male bodies are simply uninteresting. They're not necessarily disgusting or hideous, they're just sexually utterly boring. Same goes for gay men with respect to female bodies. For bisexuals however, I can see your point; if you have urges for both sexes, you can simply choose which to entertain.

As for people who love trees and animals and such, they're such a small percentage of the population that they're probably brain damaged in one way or another.

I've read books and taken seminars on the subject. Probably spent at least a few hundred hours trying to figure out how the mind works and anyone else who has studied it will tell you the same thing. What you focus on, is what occupies your mind. If you think positive thoughts about it, you will love it. If you think negative thoughts about it, you will hate it.
You think that because your basing your conclusions on the way your own mind works, and apparently you can love men if you want to, which makes you bisexual at the very least. I come from a liberal part of the world where gays are very much accepted. Some guys here try to be gay because they think it's trendy and cool. They're feminine, love fashion, watch sex and the city and some wear makeup. Some even force themselves to have gay sex. But when it comes right down to it, they fail at being gay, and they settle with a girl, calling themselves bisexual rather than gay. Because it's not in their nature.

Same goes for good Christian men who happen to be gays; they struggle like crazy throughout their lives trying to be heterosexual, they suppress these urges and they marry females, only to end up like so many republican politicians (Mark Foley, Ted Haggard, Larry Craig and Bob Allen) have done. Pretending your heterosexual when your homosexual by nature, is not good, no matter how well you think you can handle it. Now if your bisexual (which you seem to be), you'll most likely have no problems, but if your a suppressed homosexual, it'll probably blow up on your family some day.

As for the bible condemning homosexuality, God clearly speaks to the common man - of homosexual acts conducted by heterosexual men. Gods message is that if your heterosexual, you shouldn't have sex with other men, like the Romans and Greeks used to (specially the soldiers of the time), and like a lot of people do in prisons today. That is a sin because it's unhealthy. There's nothing in the bible implying that God ever mentioned people who are homosexuals by nature at all.
 
Quote from destroyer:

I come from a liberal part of the world where gays are very much accepted. Some guys here try to be gay because they think it's trendy and cool. They're feminine, love fashion, watch sex and the city and some wear makeup. Some even force themselves to have gay sex. But when it comes right down to it, they fail at being gay, and they settle with a girl, calling themselves bisexual rather than gay. Because it's not in their nature.

LOL. I guess that crazy right winger has a point. If we accept homosexuality, alot of straight guys will try (and fail) to become gay because the women like it.

The things we'll do for women. :D
 
Quote from destroyer:


As for people who love trees and animals and such, they're such a small percentage of the population that they're probably brain damaged in one way or another.


So let me get this straight (no pun intended)...if its a small percentage of people that have a weird sexual desire, its because they are damaged in the brain....but if its a large group, then its nature?

How come we accept one groups immoral desires as normal, but not the other? Why is one considered brain damaged and the other not.

It is against the law for someone to have sex with a brain damaged or mentally impared person, so if homosexuality is brain damage or a mental imparment, then it should be against the law for them to have sex with each other, right?
 
Quote from destroyer:

No, people doesn't become pedophile by entertaining the thought of sex with kids. The reasons for pedophilia is much more complex. It has to do, I think, with a complete lack of development of sexuality all together.


Nice try,but thats not it. Its entertaining the thoughts. Just like rapists, pedophiles are the same breed. In america rapists are bred by watching alot of pornography(it not always this way, but its how the majority of rapists in america start out and many testify to this). When they are not watching porn, they are looking at every pretty girl and playing sex scenes in their head with her. This goes on for a long time usually until watching porn and using his imagination no longer quenches his desire. Then he has to go out and get it. This is what happens with pedophiles and homosexuals too (not with porn, but the thinking about it. It might start off with just thinking about it once in a while and it feeds on itself. It works the same way as one gets addicted to drugs. He might not get addicted the first time he tries it, but he thinks about how good a time he had when he did drugs...then he does it again and again and the only way to stop doing drugs is to stop thinking about them. Same with food. People who think about food all the time are usually really overweight. People who think about men all the time will end up being homosexual.

Everything that we do, desire,love, hate and think comes from a choice. Sometimes we dont know where that choice comes from or why we made it. Many people do not even know they made a choice, but somewhere they made a small choice which ballooned into what it is today.

Yes some homosexuals struggle with trying to change and do the right thing...but so do drug addicts. So do pathological liars. When you are in a pattern of behavior, its hard to change it. That doesnt mean its nature though.

More evidence that homosexuality is a choice is that science has never found the part of the brain that would make someone homosexual by biology. With all the science and the mapping of the human genome they have not found it. Why? Because it doesnt exist.
 
Quote from olias:

I used to be uncomfortable with gay people too....when I was about 14. As I got older and though about it, and have developed friendships with many great ( and I mean outstanding) gay people I now have no problem with it whatsoever. I hope you come to the same realization some day. What is the crime? That they don't reproduce? I'm may not have kids either, am I just as guilty? I wouldn't have respect for someone who tells me 'it's wrong because someone else told me it's wrong...'. Even for a religious man, did God say it's wrong? Did Jesus say it's wrong? Did Buddha say it's wrong? You can't tell me that they choose to be this way. Who the hell would choose to go against their natural, possibly strongest natural instinct only to be scorned by society?

I'm not trying to act holier than though, I just like to debate

Religious views on sexuality are as legitimate and well-founded as religious views on gravity, the flatness of the earth, the creation of the universe in 7 days, miracles, or anything else. I.e. completely irrelevant and worthless. Views founded in empirical facts and logic, testable in the real world, have validity - the rest is mostly unjustified faith-based codswallop, the same kind of crap that preaches the existence of angels, reincarnation, astrology, faith-healing, and other totally discredited unscientific bunkum.

A debate about gays has nothing to do with religion. The legitimacy or otherwise of any behaviour is not altered one iota by what various creation-myths or spiritual cults have to say about it. One should no more debate Christian, Muslim, or Buddhist opinion on homosexuality than one should pay attention to what Wotan or Set or witch doctors or shamans have to say about it.
 
A more relevant question might be why people who refrain from using epithets like nigger, spic or kike on this message board, feel comfortable using insults based around homosexuality, and why the mods put up with it. After all, the terms and conditions specifically prohibit all of these prejudicial insults, and common decency means you should not denigrate someone with insults because of their sexuality - if you disapprove of it, and want to discuss that, it can be done without using loaded personal invective.

My personal view is that it's mere cowardice. A bigot knows that he will get socially ostracized for calling people niggers, kikes, or camel-fuckers (although the latter is more accepted thanks to 9/11), and will definitely get banned here for the first two at least (for some reason racist arab-bashing is ok on ET, but bashing blacks or Jews with racial terms isn't). So he refrains out of fear of the backlash. But because this punishment doesn't happen when you call someone a fag or homo, they go right ahead and use the terms casually, as though it's acceptable.

Whilst there has been progress in racism, homophobia still runs rampant in ET and broader society, and it's still seen as ok to casually demean and insult homosexuals. Just like demeaning women, insecure and bigoted individuals feel they can safely pick on those they perceive to be weaker.
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

I think the reason homosexuality really irks Christians is not because their fear of homosexuals, or bigotry, but the fact that homosexuals try to convince us that its not wrong.

Out of interest, what is wrong with it in your view? What are you main reasons for thinking it's immoral/criminal? Let's say two gay people live together and have sex exclusively with each other in private, and don't mention it to anyone without being asked, and otherwise obey the law and function as normal members of society. On what grounds do you find that sufficiently objectionable that it ought to be illegal or condemned? What harm is being done, what really gets your goat about it?

Try to avoid citing biblical reasons, since obviously they won't be convincing to any non-Christians.
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

Once you start to study the bible and pray for wisdom in understanding it, you see some of the "hidden" things that the non-believers dont see whether by their own choice or just not being able to as they have to let go of their secular conflicting beliefs to see it.

Or as someone put that differently Peil in the context of the Holocaust.

For believers there are no questions (How could a just and merciful God allow the atrocities of the Holocaust to occur?). And for non-believers there are no answers (as to how a just and merciful God could allow such man made evil to flourish).
 
Quote from unretired:

You make a very good point.

Technically:

Those who are born again and have a regenerate spirit ... or the Spirit of Christ ...

Technically we are not the same type of creature as those who do not.

2 Cor 5:17 Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. KJV

This makes them the next evolution of mankind per se and the previous is primitive in comparison.

I find your comment more of a mirror judgment of your own condition.


Perhaps these precepts are best illustrated in the following scriptures:

Matt 7:1-6
"Judge not, that you be not judged.
For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.
And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?
Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me remove the speck from your eye'; and look, a plank is in your own eye?
Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces.
NKJV

That's the thing, I don't judge gays. Nowhere in the Bible does it give me the authority to do that... I just don't encourage any stupid behavior, homosexuality included...
 
Back
Top