Freezing January for Easterners Was Not Felt Round the World

If you are going to try and sneak a CO2 in the gaps argument you are going to have to produce some science showing man made co2 is causing warming in this environment.

what the data shows is that historically co2 lags warming and cooling.
And that in the current data sets... (the ones all the agw nutters use) CO2 lags change in ocean temps (and change in air temps) by 9 months. (see the humlum paper in my previous post, which I will post again... since you ignored it)

So... the burden is on you agw nutters to show that laggard is actually the cause.
----------
Don't forget the science tells us when oceans warm they off gas co2 and when they cool they eat co2. (which is consistent with the data)

and NASA told us co2 is the most efficient coolant in the upper atmosphere.




All Salby has done is to claim AGW is wrong by claiming his ideas are right. Most of the data he uses is not attributed nor stands the scrutiny AGW does. That'll be why he won't publish.


So what exactly is the problem?

Are you trying to suggest if co2 lags a temperature rise, co2 can't have anything to do with a temperature rise. Really??
So presumably you must think because hens lag eggs, hens can't have anything to do with eggs either!

Well obviously you haven't , or rather won't even educate yourself in the basic science behind the greenhouse effect. Probably you get extremely confused about eggs too.

All the denier lag claim actually manages is to suggest the first bout of warming on Earth needn't have been affected by co2, but induced by a different natural cause. That doesn't stop every other warming event being caused and or amplified by co2, and more recently by excessive amounts of anthropic co2. Or in other words temperature increase by exactly how and why the greenhouse effect works.

But then that's the same approach creationists, birthers and general all round conspiracists use all the time. Front run ignorance into a topic to try and suggest what is really happening sound like it couldn't.
 
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658


Abstract
Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5–10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes.

---
see that co2 always lags temperatue.


note you can find the paper for free on the internet
 
I think the whole gay commentary comes from your statements about experimentation with your brother. I never saw the comments, but lots of these guys continue to throw them around.

Talking points from the dim witted on this site.
 
Who cares if he thinks you're gay? It's the internet, does anyone believe everything they read here? I hope not.

Anyway, his and his party's gay hatred is good for dems. Please encourage it.

Because he is one hand talking about God and morality and on the other he is lying.


Of course this is just typical right-wing "Christian" hypocrisy. Nothing new there.
 
I think the whole gay commentary comes from your statements about experimentation with your brother. I never saw the comments, but lots of these guys continue to throw them around.


Really? You too singed toe? I thought you had just a little class. Guess not. You're just another low-life, ignorant, bigoted righty.
 
Really? You too singed toe? I thought you had just a little class. Guess not. You're just another low-life, ignorant, bigoted righty.

I said I didn't see the comments, just telling you where they continue to stem from.

But yeah, I guess I'm the one with no class, while you're the one throwing out all the insults. :confused::confused: Singed toe. That's uh...hey, yeah. That's a good one.
 
Back
Top