Freezing January for Easterners Was Not Felt Round the World

[futurecurrents]

I said I didn't see the comments, just telling you where they continue to stem from.

But yeah, I guess I'm the one with no class, while you're the one throwing out all the insults. Singed toe. That's uh...hey, yeah. That's a good one.

"I think the whole gay commentary comes from your statements about experimentation with your brother. I never saw the comments,"

I guess you forgot the "alleged" part. You also forgot to use common sense and critical thinking. Most normal people would consider the premise highly suspect. To put it mildly.

But if was just an accident that you were being stupid then I apologize.

 

[Tsing Tao]

"I think the whole gay commentary comes from your statements about experimentation with your brother. I never saw the comments,"

I guess you forgot the "alleged" part. You also forgot to use common sense and critical thinking. Most normal people would consider the premise highly suspect. To put it mildly.

But if was just an accident that you were being stupid then I apologize.

Yes, it's all my fault for leaving out the words you wanted me to put in there to make you feel better.

Look, I don't know whether you're gay or not, whether the comments they claim you made are real or not. Frankly, I don't care. I've never called you gay, nor would I. I respect a person's desire to have whatever lifestyle they wish with whomever/whatever they wish.

Rarely have I been as rude to you as you are all the time to me, and when I do it's just because I've lost my patience with your holier-than-thou approach you take all over this entire forum.

I guess what I'm trying to say is you can stuff your fake apology where the sun don't shine. You're pretty much a shitty person, and that much is obvious by the manner in which you sling insults around so freely. And I don't care if you're nice or not, your words just kinda make me laugh anyway. But don't pretend to be someone "above it all" when you're not a whole lot more than a trolling miscreant.

Have a happy day.

 

[fhl]

 

[jem]

you bait and insult Christians almost every day recently.
what I see is you and a few of your anti science atheist and leftist pals attempting to insult Christians as part of your strategy of disinformation.
(and I mean your pals... I am not saying all atheists are like you.)

Because he is one hand talking about God and morality and on the other he is lying.


Of course this is just typical right-wing "Christian" hypocrisy. Nothing new there.

 

[Lucrum]

Talking points from the dim witted on this site.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ZTFTbdTtZs4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Average IQ by occupation (estimated from wordsum scores)

Roofer - 89.3

Slightly higher than janitor.

 

[stu]

what the data shows is that historically co2 lags warming and cooling.

I'll ask again as clearly all your chairs are not at home. Exactly what is your problem with lag? I've given reason why it is not a valid claim, so rather than address that, why are you just repeating it like a dickhead.

 

[Spike Trader]

luke . . . you cannot install a roof by the controls of your computer,
but one can fly a plane by the controls of a computer.

 

[Lucrum]

luke . . . you cannot install a roof by the controls of your computer,
but one can fly a plane by the controls of a computer.

Thank you for reminding me why I pay little to no attention to anything you post.

 

[jem]

I gave you the chance to understand...

the facts we have are that CO2 levels track but lags change in ocean temps by 11 to 12 months.

if you wish to establish that even though co2 tracks but lags temperature change it would up to you to show some proof man made co2 is causing warming in our environment.

you despise God in gaps arguments... but you are now making a co2 in the gaps argument.

use your brains... present some science showing man made co2 is causing warming in our environment.

Prediction... no science will be produced... but expect insults or misdirection.

I'll ask again as clearly all your chairs are not at home. Exactly what is your problem with lag? I've given reason why it is not a valid claim, so rather than address that, why are you just repeating it like a dickhead.

 

[jem]

this is the science stu... where is yours?

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658


Abstract
Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the period January 1980 to December 2011. Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 variations to lag behind atmospheric temperature changes on a century to millennium scale, but modern temperature is expected to lag changes in atmospheric CO2, as the atmospheric temperature increase since about 1975 generally is assumed to be caused by the modern increase in CO2. In our analysis we use eight well-known datasets: 1) globally averaged well-mixed marine boundary layer CO2 data, 2) HadCRUT3 surface air temperature data, 3) GISS surface air temperature data, 4) NCDC surface air temperature data, 5) HadSST2 sea surface data, 6) UAH lower troposphere temperature data series, 7) CDIAC data on release of anthropogene CO2, and 8) GWP data on volcanic eruptions. Annual cycles are present in all datasets except 7) and 8), and to remove the influence of these we analyze 12-month averaged data. We find a high degree of co-variation between all data series except 7) and 8), but with changes in CO2 always lagging changes in temperature. The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5–10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes.

---
see that co2 always lags temperature.


note you can find the paper for free on the internet