Fox News’ Shep Smith Methodically Debunks Uranium One Conspiracy Theories

that is what breitbart said... but it added the fact that normally CFIUS makes the decsions by unanimous vote. You really need to educate yourself. You might start by reading the whole article before you comment.

What is with you Cons and your shameless lying

This is what Breitbart said

"Crucially, any one member can block a transaction. Such a “veto” can only be undone by the President, "

I cited the Treasury report which said

"Only the President has the authority to suspend or prohibit a covered transaction.. if CFIUS or any member of CFIUS recommends suspension or prohibition of the transaction"

A recommendation is NOT a veto, CFIUS cannot BLOCK either.

Stop lecturing on my comprehension when you can't even read. How would the entire article which is utter trash and a complete fabrication disprove what I highlighted? Breitbart is a lying rag just like you.
 
look you troll moron... you said you did not read the whole article...

exthinker said:
"Didn't even have to read the whole thing, first relevant paragraph is itself a lie"

The breitbart article explained how the process actually worked in real life.

CFIUS liked to reach unanimity. Which is why Breitbart used words like effectively and technically in the article. which you might not have understood had you read the article.



here is a quote from the article... which you apparently did not read.


"Among the many things Smith objected to was Clinton’s ability to influence the deal’s approval. “The Clinton State Department had no power to approve or veto that transaction. It could do neither,” he said.
He correctly states that it was CFIUS — the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States — that made the decision. CFIUS is a cabinet-level committee consisting of representatives from several Departments and Agencies, including the Secretaries of the Treasury, State, Defense, etc. Smith claims that State was only one member and that the real decision was the President’s. However, Smith’s claim is misleading. While the final decision technically rests with the White House, CFIUS traditionally, and as far as is publicly known, operates by unanimous consent. Crucially, any one member can block a transaction. Such a “veto” can only be undone by the President, though there is no known case of the President overruling CFIUS since the committee was set up in 1975. In short, the Clinton State Department had the power to effectively gut the deal."
 
Last edited:
look you troll moron... you said you did not read the whole article...

exthinker said:
"Didn't even have to read the whole thing, first relevant paragraph is itself a lie"

The breitbart article explained how the process actually worked in real life.

CFIUS liked to reach unanimity. Which is why Breitbart used words like effectively and technically in the article. which you might not have understood had you read the article.



here is a quote from the article... which you apparently did not read.


"Among the many things Smith objected to was Clinton’s ability to influence the deal’s approval. “The Clinton State Department had no power to approve or veto that transaction. It could do neither,” he said.
He correctly states that it was CFIUS — the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States — that made the decision. CFIUS is a cabinet-level committee consisting of representatives from several Departments and Agencies, including the Secretaries of the Treasury, State, Defense, etc. Smith claims that State was only one member and that the real decision was the President’s. However, Smith’s claim is misleading. While the final decision technically rests with the White House, CFIUS traditionally, and as far as is publicly known, operates by unanimous consent. Crucially, any one member can block a transaction. Such a “veto” can only be undone by the President, though there is no known case of the President overruling CFIUS since the committee was set up in 1975. In short, the Clinton State Department had the power to effectively gut the deal."


I quoted that very part you philistine retard and I refuted that very part using direct links from the Treasury site.

Where the fuck are the smart conservatives, every single one of them is either dishonest, disingenuous or dumb as rocks.
 
total bullshit.

nothing is predicated on the fact hillary soley approved. That is your sides bullshit spin.

the gravamen of the situation is Hillary and Bill got millions and uranium left the country.

its important to all thinking people because the US imports uranium and its used to make nukes.



Final comments on this retarded conspiracy

1st- The conspiracy predicates on the fact that Hillary Clinton solely approved of the sale. She did not. 9 Government entities approved of the sale, including the state department. So how would bribing one person by so much accomplish the rest? And if she indeed try to influence rest of the government, why hasn't anyone found evidence of that?

2nd- WHY THE FUCK DOES IT MATTER IF US SOLD URANIUM TO THE RUSSIANS? Its a commodity. US doesn't use uranium in nuclear weapons and haven't since 1964. US uses plutonium.

3rd-The "20 percent of the nations uranium" is complete bullshit, it is less than 5% of our KNOWN uranium reserves. Secondly they can't export it, they can only sell it to nuclear energy plants under NRC's orders.

4th-The Tenex bribery case was Russians trying to IMPORT their Uranium into the country, why would they try to export something at market costs when they have it more than they need?

5th-There is no investigation, because as the attorney general himself said. The DOJ isn't for your idiotic partisan conspiracies so take it back to Infowars.

6th - Breitbart is trash, anyone even believing or citing it is an utter moron and should be ignored as a matter of principle.
 
you are a troll loser who did not understand the article because you said you did not read it.
The article debunked shep smith.
The point you tried to make about the president having the power... was explained to be far less of an important point because in real life the committee likes to come to a consensus. (you understand that issue now?)

you don't have to be an asshole about this.
you could just say oops... I should have read the whole thing.

I quoted that very part you philistine retard and I refuted that very part using direct links from the Treasury site.

Where the fuck are the smart conservatives, every single one of them is either dishonest, disingenuous or dumb as rocks.
 
you are a troll loser who did not understand the article because you said you did not read it.
The article debunked shep smith.
The point you tried to make about the president having the power... was explained to be far less of an important point because in real life the committee like to come to a consensus.

you don't have to be an asshole about this.
you could just say oops... I should have read the whole thing.

The article LIED and I pointed it out, it can't debunk Smith if they themselves are lying which they were.

Breitbart claimed that CFIUS members can block or veto - that's patently false as I proved using DIRECT LINKS.

You refuse to acknowledge it and go on repeating ad nauseam with multiple insults thrown in - this is your standard operating procedure every time you start losing an argument.

CFIUS has NO POWERS TO VETO, that's proven. Breitbart is lying and so are you. If you think I am wrong then show me the legal language where it says CFIUS can veto deals, go on, provide a link. Breitbart claims doesn't count, they are pedophile defenders and post fake peer reviewed papers as you already know.
 
total bullshit.

nothing is predicated on the fact hillary soley approved. That is your sides bullshit spin.

the gravamen of the situation is Hillary and Bill got millions and uranium left the country.

its important to all thinking people because the US imports uranium and its used to make nukes.

If all this is true then why have FIVE House and Senate committees failed to find any EVIDENCE?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-probe-despite-no-wrongdoing-findings.315133/

Why won't you explain the simple fact that Russia tried to IMPORT Uranium into the country with the Tenex bribery case, why would they pay millions to export the very same Uranium out of the country at market price using this deal. That's a very simple question that you will refuse to answer.

Russia pays hundreds and millions of dollars in bribes, exports this uranium at market price and then they export this uranium back to the US at market price? Are you kidding me with this crap? Considering this is a trading board, tell me how this trade makes sense.

You are a thinker? You are a propagandist who repeats every single right wing garbage every day. You claimed Seth Rich was murdered by Hillary as well, you have zero credibility
 
actually our comments here are frequently ahead of the right wing cites because we comment here real time as the news breaks... (frequently)

whereas you don't comment til you get the go ahead from your dnc talkiing poiints


and as far as the sick pedo lovers here... fuck you... don't bring up that pedo shit with me again... you are fucking asshole. I have kids... and I worked in juvenile/hall family court. I have seen what it does to families and been told by probabation officers does when little kids are sexualized. Its very serious... fuck off with your bullshit accusations.... asshole.

But, tony won't condemn weinstein will you?


If all this is true then why have FIVE House and Senate committees failed to find any EVIDENCE?

https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...-probe-despite-no-wrongdoing-findings.315133/

Why won't you explain the simple fact that Russia tried to IMPORT Uranium into the country with the Tenex bribery case, why would they pay millions to export the very same Uranium out of the country at market price using this deal. That's a very simple question that you will refuse to answer.

Russia pays hundreds and millions of dollars in bribes, exports this uranium at market price and then they export this uranium back to the US at market price? Are you kidding me with this crap? Considering this is a trading board, tell me how this trade makes sense.

You are a thinker? You are a propagandist who repeats every single right wing garbage every day. You claimed Seth Rich was murdered by Hillary as well, you have zero credibility
 
Last edited:
the article did not lie. It pointed out that fact that hillary's voted and influence matter for practical reasons.

It even put veto in quotes... so morons from the dnc could not successfully make fraudulent claims about what they were saying..
read it again..


However, Smith’s claim is misleading. While the final decision technically rests with the White House, CFIUS traditionally, and as far as is publicly known, operates by unanimous consent. Crucially, any one member can block a transaction. Such a “veto” can only be undone by the President, though there is no known case of the President overruling CFIUS since the committee was set up in 1975. In short, the Clinton State Department had the power to effectively gut the deal."




The article LIED and I pointed it out, it can't debunk Smith if they themselves are lying which they were.

Breitbart claimed that CFIUS members can block or veto - that's patently false as I proved using DIRECT LINKS.

You refuse to acknowledge it and go on repeating ad nauseam with multiple insults thrown in - this is your standard operating procedure every time you start losing an argument.

CFIUS has NO POWERS TO VETO, that's proven. Breitbart is lying and so are you. If you think I am wrong then show me the legal language where it says CFIUS can veto deals, go on, provide a link. Breitbart claims doesn't count, they are pedophile defenders and post fake peer reviewed papers as you already know.
 
I was in a rush to get to a meeting.
That was a little over the top and I apologize to exgopper.
But you should stop throwing that fucking term around.
I would hope and expect nobody here supports anyone molests kids.
 
Back
Top