Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera, Dana Perino Call Out Trump for Failing to Condemn Roseanne’s Racism
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
Anyone who spent time learning American history during WWII would know that with so many men off to war and so many dying... the people back home had to be strong. American also purposefully projected strength. We had roise the riveter. Women taking over mens jobs in the the factories. Women playing baseball. Womens fashion got big and boxy with shoulders... ths clothes the shoes become more masculine. Projecting strength.
(sorry the pictures did not show up)
Mens suit were big an boxy too... the double breasted suits of wwII to my mind the strongest best look men ever had.
There is no doubt FDR would not want to be seen as weak and I am sure that the media being mostly pro American back then would have happily complied.
(sorry the pictures did not show up)
Mens suit were big an boxy too... the double breasted suits of wwII to my mind the strongest best look men ever had.
There is no doubt FDR would not want to be seen as weak and I am sure that the media being mostly pro American back then would have happily complied.
Yep. Name changes are complicated too. And using weird SSN numbers is also complicated. Destroying school records is complicated. The problem is deception. It complicates matters. Tell one lie then you have to tell another. Pretty sooner you get to be a pretty good liar. Good for you. Not good for US.
Last edited:
Oh look... more zero-content snark from the "late 50-something internet lurking fag hag from Canada." My shocked face
Go back to school and do something productive for a change. Unless, of course, you enjoy making a fool of yourself.
Ok, I'd agree they are good parents, fair of you. But getting back to the bit about Michelle Obama being a man. Teapot conspiracies of that level and magnitude.. some days don't you think that maybe the right has a credibility problem? That perhaps a rational person might reject those who don't reject this?
I am curious, how are you on the moon landing?
Oh look... more zero-content snark from the "late 50-something internet lurking fag hag from Canada." My shocked face
Do you have Tourette's on top of everything else? If you want to debate religion, go to the "religion" forum.
If that's not it, tell me what "point" you "think" I missed so I can further humiliate you.
You already missed it, so what would be the point? Just watch the pretty picture.
I get it now. My bad for being a relative newbie and trying to have a conversation while not understanding the depth of your affliction. You must have been rejected countless times by others in your 50+ years. If you won't get professional help may I suggest getting a dog? They've been bred for unconditional love and I doubt one would reject you like people always do, unless you're abusive.
I am curious, how are you on the moon landing?
Not a good comparison to the series of hoaxes needed to gain and maintain the Obama presidency.
Getting to the flat earth level, the desire to be special opens up a mind to gullibility. I don't have that kind of desire for intellectual supremacy to be tempted by such hoaxes.
You don't need a desire for intellectual supremacy to see something amiss in the series of hoaxes leading through the O presidency...nor the hoaxes supporting the official narrative of 911.