Fox News’ Geraldo Rivera, Dana Perino Call Out Trump for Failing to Condemn Roseanne’s Racism

[exGOPer]

Not a good comparison to the series of hoaxes needed to gain and maintain the Obama presidency.

Getting to the flat earth level, the desire to be special opens up a mind to gullibility. I don't have that kind of desire for intellectual supremacy to be tempted by such hoaxes.

You don't need a desire for intellectual supremacy to see something amiss in the series of hoaxes leading through the O presidency...nor the hoaxes supporting the official narrative of 911.

This from the guy who calls Michelle Obama a trans without absolutely any evidence.

LOL, what credibility do you have to detect hoaxes when you yourself are a blatant liar?

 

[Good1]

This from the guy who calls Michelle Obama a trans without absolutely any evidence.

LOL, what credibility do you have to detect hoaxes when you yourself are a blatant liar?

I've said it's a high probability, beyond mere possibility. By implying a lie, you presume to know. You don't know, you intellectual supremacist.

 

[exGOPer]

I've said it's a high probability, beyond mere possibility. By implying a lie, you presume to know. You don't know, you intellectual supremacist.

High probability based on what? What are the factors, can you point to a single piece of fact or evidence used to derive this probability? Let's see it.

 

[Good1]

High probability based on what? What are the factors, can you point to a single piece of fact or evidence used to derive this probability? Let's see it.

Don't waste my time. Google is your friend.

What is absolutely certain is you are unable to tell the difference, even up close, depending on the level of "pass" they've attained.

Only a hormonal supremacist would think he knows, in every circumstance.

 

[exGOPer]

Don't waste my time. Google is your friend.

What is absolutely certain is you are unable to tell the difference, even up close, depending on the level of "pass" they've attained.

Only a hormonal supremacist would think he knows, in every circumstance.

Wow, this is original, make a outrageous blatantly false claim and then say 'google it'. If I google 'Trump child rapist and incestuous', I would get a lot of hits too - should I just accept them as facts then because I 'googled' it?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I get it now. My bad for being a relative newbie and trying to have a conversation while not understanding the depth of your affliction. You must have been rejected countless times by others in your 50+ years. If you won't get professional help may I suggest getting a dog? They've been bred for unconditional love and I doubt one would reject you like people always do, unless you're abusive.

View attachment 186781

 

[Good1]

Wow, this is original, make a outrageous blatantly false claim and then say 'google it'. If I google 'Trump child rapist and incestuous', I would get a lot of hits too - should I just accept them as facts then because I 'googled' it?

Supremacism renders you gullible to deception. You would not know how to sort the information no matter what you searched for, as hoaxers prey upon brain supremacists like you, you brainist.

I considered the probabilities high, even before Joan Rivers, who had officiated a gay wedding, said "Transgender. We all know it", to make a point that gay weddings are nothing new, and nothing to get upset about.

Not that I consider Obama's marriage to be gay, as I don't think of male-to-female trans as men. But if you were gay, and needed to appear to be straight for political office, it would be a nice compromise.

 

[exGOPer]

Supremacism renders you gullible to deception. You would not know how to sort the information no matter what you searched for, as hoaxers prey upon brain supremacists like you, you brainist.

I considered the probabilities high, even before Joan Rivers, who had officiated a gay wedding, said "Transgender. We all know it", to make a point that gay weddings are nothing new, and nothing to get upset about. Not that I consider Obama's marriage to be gay, as I don't think of male-to-female trans as men.

So your evidence is Joan Rivers, a comedienne's offhand quip as the factor to arrive at the conclusion that Michelle Obama is trans?

LOL

Did I tell you about how low intellect and conservatism is linked? It was a scientific study so surely you would consider the probabilities high.

 

[Good1]

So your evidence is Joan Rivers, a comedienne's offhand quip as the factor to arrive at the conclusion that Michelle Obama is trans?

LOL

Did I tell you about how low intellect and conservatism is linked? It was a scientific study so surely you would consider the probabilities high.

No I said don't waste my time if you can't handle Google because of your brain supremacism, which is the definition of a bracist. Did you want fries and ketchup with your evidence?

Offhand a remark as it was, taken in context, as explained, she meant it. It was not the joke of a comedienne. Maybe she exaggerated a bit, "We all know it", depending on who "all" is, but certainly she was trying to say it was common knowlege.

The Democrats who know the facts would be just as happy to take the votes of ideological supremacists like you, and let you find out at your own speed. As I've said, supremacism renders you susceptible to deception.

 

[exGOPer]

Supremacism renders you gullible to deception. You would not know how to sort the information no matter what you searched for, as hoaxers prey upon brain supremacists like you, you brainist.

I considered the probabilities high, even before Joan Rivers, who had officiated a gay wedding, said "Transgender. We all know it", to make a point that gay weddings are nothing new, and nothing to get upset about. Not that I consider Obama's marriage to be gay, as I don't think of male-to-female trans as


No I said don't waste my time if you can't handle Google because of your brain supremacism, which is the definition of a bracist.

Offhand as it was, taken in context, as explained, she meant it. Maybe she exaggerated a bit, "We all know it", depending on who "all" is, but certainly she was trying to say it was common knowlege.

The Democrats who know the facts would be just as happy to take the votes of ideological supremacists like you, and let you find out at your own speed. As I've said, supremacism renders you susceptible to deception.

Are you Jack Hershey's illegitimate love child? Your incoherent babblings are getting to a point where it's hard to tell the difference between idiocy and parody.

And who the fuck is 'WE"?

Yes, I am a supremacist, anyone who is above your kind of conservative thinking is an evolved person.