Fox is getting annoying

[Picaso]

Quote from ChkitOut:

Thats fancy!

Yours for "only" 249

http://www.logitech.com/en-us/remotes/universal-remotes/devices/6441

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from LEAPup:

This thread went from a discussion to right down the shitter. Wow!

Stop with the compliments. You're making bugscoe flush.

 

[ChkitOut]

Quote from Picaso:

Yours for "only" 249

http://www.logitech.com/en-us/remotes/universal-remotes/devices/6441

damn, thats seems like a total ripoff.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Stop with the compliments. You're making bugscoe flush.

At least it's not making YOUR nipples hard - AGAIN.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2330809&highlight=nipples#post2330809

Quote from Thunderdog/Gabfly1:

You too? Please stop flirting. You're making my nipples hard.

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from Lucrum:

At least it's not making YOUR nipples hard - AGAIN.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2330809&highlight=nipples#post2330809

You seem to have that post bookmarked, since you quote it again and again, albeit out of context. The context being that it was in response to an unwarranted and derogatory sexual reference. But never mind. The important thing is that it gives you pleasure.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Prior warning of imminent danger based on credible and accumulating intelligence is not quite the same as prior knowledge of a specific event. It seems you're the truther. I only referred to prior warning of imminent danger. You decided to go off the deep end in this thread with your usual flair.

Quote from Gabfly1:

Well, he had certainly been warned of some reasonably specific danger well in advance by the outgoing administration.

I believe the key word you used was "specific" danger.

Feel free to come back and redefine what "event" and "danger" means now as well, wacko Truther boy!

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from bugscoe:

I believe the key word you used was "specific" danger.

Feel free to come back and redefine what "event" and "danger" means now as well, wacko Truther boy!

Bush had intelligence that terrorists might actually use an aircraft as a weapon. That was a real and specific "danger." There was no intelligence suggesting the specific targets and the date. Those were the specific "event."

You are a mindless organ pod suitable for harvesting. End it now so that others may live.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Bush had intelligence that terrorists might actually use an aircraft as a weapon. That was a real and specific "danger." There was no intelligence suggesting the specific targets and the date. Those were the specific "event."

You are a mindless organ pod suitable for harvesting. End it now so that others may live.

Quote from Gabfly1:

Bush chose to ignore the gathered intelligence that had been presented to him before the fact.

We'll call you a LIHOP truther ("Let it happen on purpose") – "suggests that key individuals within the government had at least some foreknowledge of the attacks and deliberately ignored them or actively weakened America's defenses to ensure the hijacked flights were not intercepted."

 

[omegapoint]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Bush had intelligence that terrorists might actually use an aircraft as a weapon. That was a real and specific "danger." There was no intelligence suggesting the specific targets and the date. Those were the specific "event."

You are a mindless organ pod suitable for harvesting. End it now so that others may live.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

You seem to have that post bookmarked, since you quote it again and again, albeit out of context. The context being that it was in response to an unwarranted and derogatory sexual reference. But never mind. The important thing is that it gives you pleasure.

Context you say? It doesn't matter what the context was, you look<s>ed</s> like a girlie man perv PERIOD.

(And if it's any consolation, I don't have it booked marked.)