Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story

DT, I'm going to give you one example of why I'm not going to continue this exchange with you ...

You say in an early post:
>demolished building should fall into its
>own footprint. And that's exactly what
>happened to the WTC.

That's a very strong position there DT. Saying the towers "exactly" fell into their own footprint doesn't leave a lot of room for negotiation or flexibility.

Of course I correctly point out that the towers DIDN'T fall anwhere near into their footprint and here is your response:

>And yeah it is quite damn reasonable to conclude
>that even CD will cause surrounding buildings to be
>hit, especially concerning the fact that we had TWO
>giant 110 floor towers not some relatively small one!

So, after makeing absolutely and totally bogus assertions, you now want to claim that you have the "damn reasonable" ability to know what would happen in a CD situation.

IMO it's "damn reasonable to conclude" that you don't.

I've appreciated the civil tone of your questions and responses. Thanks. I'm moving on.

JB
 
Quote from Haroki:



What a classic troofer strawman!!!

NIST never said that the fires weakened the steel to the point that it couldn't hold up the building. Matter of fact, it says just the opposite, that the heating wasn't enough.

NIST actually gives another reason for the collapse. But psycho troofers will never actually learn what NIST says so that they can argue intelligently against it.

But the truth is wood, in many instances, can do BETTER than steel in a fire.
More...

let me guess... ok so steel weakening by fires wasn't the reason. wood actually does better in a fake terror false flag? ok.. i got it hiroshi... it was PANCAKES!!!! cue circus music.... dant dant deedle deedle dant dant dant dant.... dant dant deedle deedle dant dant dant dant.....


pancake_bunny.jpg
 
Quote from traderNik:

Yes, the fact that some of the main structural supports were sliced through and then the rest were fatally undermined by fire would definitely not cause the buildings to collapse in the way they did. Undoubtedly this was a planned demolition, and if anyone believes that the grainy but legible pictures available on the internet of the Bush daughters circling the buildings in a black helicopter holding a black box with a little red light and a button are faked, you must believe that all that they have up at Roswell are a bunch of aircraft and a few tumbleweeds.

3 words for you. Follow the money.
More...


Lol, you are a funny guy.

Personally, I think both dubya AND chuck norris are great people, and I extend my hand in marriage to the daughter that isnt currently married, if there is one, assuming she aint just plain butt ugly, that they may choose to fix me up with.


Yeah, what i just said.
Chuck is a great guy, only met him once on the trail, but top notch guy.

Dubya, i spoke to this man, on his ranch , and he aint chuck norris, know what im sayin.
 
Let's hear what the Governor has to say:

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZXtnIfkTa50&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZXtnIfkTa50&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZIrBN4PQ_4o&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZIrBN4PQ_4o&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
 
Quote from Turok:

That's a very strong position there DT. Saying the towers "exactly" fell into their own footprint doesn't leave a lot of room for negotiation or flexibility.
JB [/B]
More...

Does it really matter in the case we're debating whether they fell exactly into their own footprint or also near this area? The point is, they fell straight down, not randomly to the sides.

Also, the taller the building, the easier for it's parts to spread across the place. With a small building it's much easier to have all its parts fall down into it's footprint. At least that's what common sense is suggesting.
And please remember that WTC towers were normally loaded with office stuff and furniture, on the contrary to the CD.

And what's your opinion about sudden and superfast steel weaking? What % of the whole steel construction was exposed to heavy fires? 5 maybe 10% ? What about the rest of the steel below the plane crash floor - it should be perfectly strong - there were no fires there!

Could you name any other steel frame building which fell from fire in the WTC manner? How many examples there are of much more serious and longer fires without the collapse of the steel structure?
If you'll know the answers to these both questions, then tell us what are the probabilites, in all honesty, that 3 buildings on the same day were rare exceptions.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

let me guess...
More...

Don't guess, learn something first. Learn what the NIST report ACTUALLY says before you argue against it.

This would be a first in the troof movement though, so I ain't holding my breath.

A typical troofer will do just as we see here. They have no idea what they're railing against. All that matters is repeating lies that further their politial beliefs. Because that's all the troof movement is. No search for truth, just lies to further a political agenda. Which I find particularly amusing since so many also rail about the lying in politics, then go ahead and lie themselves.

Remember, " Conspiracy theories about 9/11 are bizarre and absurd" - Ron Paul.
 
Quote from Haroki:


Remember, " Conspiracy theories about 9/11 are bizarre and absurd" - Ron Paul.
More...

yes, space beams and holographs are bizarre and absurd... see? i agree with Dr Paul AGAIN!!!! nice try pancake chickenhawk.

i still laugh everytime i see you still on here. most people would be too ashamed after their yellow bellies were exposed. LMAOOOOOOOOOO poor pancake hosirish.
 
Quote from Haroki:

Don't guess, learn something first. Learn what the NIST report ACTUALLY says before you argue against it.
More...


nice try coward boy, i know what nist/fema have said in the past. they offer no reason for the collapses and conclude, "Our best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence."

then there is hiroshi and his thoroughly laughed at pancake debacle!!!!!!! LMAOOOOOOO what a goof :eek: :D


ihop.gif
 
Quote from ratboy88:

i know what nist/fema have said in the past. QUOTE]

No, you don't.

You only know what Alex Jones tells you.

How do you propose to push your political agenda, whatever twisted version of reality that may be, when you don't even know what others are saying?

Oh yeah, that's right, it doesn't matter what reality is to the delusional like yourself.

Do they have free clinics in your area? I suggest you visit a psychologist.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top