Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story
- Thread starter 5Pillars
- Start date
I know I'm going to regret posting this. I'm not interested in joining in the flame session either.
It's just that someone is repeatedly suggesting that "creep of metals" is the reason why wtc7 fell like it did is that is embarassing to someone who understands the physics of the event.
Demolition is an EXACT science, and it takes weeks of planning in order to be able to correctly wire special explosives to the buildings's support beams on every level of the building. The timing of the explosive devices must be accurate to the millisecond such that when a floor falls to the level below, all the supports must be blown and out of the way. If any of the support beams on any of the levels were not taken out by the time the above floor reached it, the collapsing builing would topple over onto it's side instead of neatly falling into it's own footprint. I hope you can now see that to suggest that a fire or "metal creep" could emulate the demolition experts and be able to act on every floors support, completely symetrically and timed to the millisecond in sequence in order to create the desired NEAT vertical fall of a demolished building is beyond rediculous.
It's just that someone is repeatedly suggesting that "creep of metals" is the reason why wtc7 fell like it did is that is embarassing to someone who understands the physics of the event.
Demolition is an EXACT science, and it takes weeks of planning in order to be able to correctly wire special explosives to the buildings's support beams on every level of the building. The timing of the explosive devices must be accurate to the millisecond such that when a floor falls to the level below, all the supports must be blown and out of the way. If any of the support beams on any of the levels were not taken out by the time the above floor reached it, the collapsing builing would topple over onto it's side instead of neatly falling into it's own footprint. I hope you can now see that to suggest that a fire or "metal creep" could emulate the demolition experts and be able to act on every floors support, completely symetrically and timed to the millisecond in sequence in order to create the desired NEAT vertical fall of a demolished building is beyond rediculous.
Creep of metals has absolutely NOTHING to do with the demolition of the WTC buildings (that has already been established).
Pulverised concrete dust clouds at 10 TIMES the levels of a structural building collapse, but within EXACT levels of a steel/concrete structure brought down by demolitions - :eek:
This FACT talks more to what brought down the WTC buildings - NOT bogus "creep" BS!
With explosive demolition, in an urban environment, the explosives have to be surrounded by water-filled bags. The amount of water required to cause an explosives blast inwards into the Towers' structure, would have been enough to empty the Manhattan water supply system.
No one ever said their was a water shortage in the preceeding weeks.
huge water pumps would have been required to pump the water up to all the floors
Also what about
1. transporting in all the bags required to fill the water
2. taping/holding the water bags around the explosives
There would have been a physical obstruction with people not being able to move freely (and there was no physical obstruction).
oh yes... how silly of us.. the ole water bag theory in an urban setting.
well, funny you should bring this up wankerboy1000, because i was at the city permit office the day al qaeda was waiting in line to get these permits. they were really rude... pissed off a lot of people. they didn't seem to care because as they put it.. they were headed to the pussy cat lounge later on that afternoon and then they were going to roast some pigs for dinner.
they were complaining about how difficult it was to blow up bldg's these days... with all the urban requirements and stuff. some even said they were getting out of the terrorism game altogether.. just wasn't like it was in the good ole days.. ya know.. due to regulations and all.
WankerBoy1000 and his Wanker Mobile
well, funny you should bring this up wankerboy1000, because i was at the city permit office the day al qaeda was waiting in line to get these permits. they were really rude... pissed off a lot of people. they didn't seem to care because as they put it.. they were headed to the pussy cat lounge later on that afternoon and then they were going to roast some pigs for dinner.
they were complaining about how difficult it was to blow up bldg's these days... with all the urban requirements and stuff. some even said they were getting out of the terrorism game altogether.. just wasn't like it was in the good ole days.. ya know.. due to regulations and all.
WankerBoy1000 and his Wanker Mobile
Hmmm ... someone has been f***ing with you (or you're f***ing with us).
I was project manager on a large demo project in the NW a decade or so ago (took down large industrial building and smokestacks) done by the Loizeaux family.
Nary a water bag in sight (or on site for that matter).
JB
I guess there were plenty of people walking about, with no perimeter exclusion zone, or insurance, or protective sheeting from flying debris.
You must have had quite an explosion rather than an implosion (which is what is being questioned), and used up more explosives than those dropped in Iraq?
Almost forgot, you must have had a demolition/explosives coordinator?
Just for the record, my IQ is 138 too, probably higher but I had a terrible hangover when I did the test.
So your generalizations about CP-ers goes up in flames. Because, if I had to choose I would choose the side of Rat and 5P, for the simple reason that if a government story about a war-inducing disaster would be the truth, it would be the first time in history. So, when in doubt (and there is enough reason to be in doubt, you have to agree) than start searching at the 'false' premise.
Btw. the way you generalized about the 'properties' of the CP-ers you know personaly is preposterous and a sure sign of weak intelligence. Do you know 1 person with all those properties, or do you know 10 ppl, all with 1 of those properties. You may have a high IQ, which I doubt from your posts, but you don't have an open mind. And open minds are worth a lot more than intelligent ones.