Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story

Turok · Apr 9, 2008

1000:
>WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DON'T GET!!!!!!!!!!
>!!!!! JESUS

(I'll keep repeating it until you deal with it)

I don't get why you assert the following:

"when using explosives for demolision, there is a simultaneous setting off of all explosives."

...when video evidence clearly shows you're wrong.

JB

1000 · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from Turok:

1000:
>WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DON'T GET!!!!!!!!!!
>!!!!! JESUS

(I'll keep repeating it until you deal with it)

I don't get why you assert the following:

"when using explosives for demolision, there is a simultaneous setting off of all explosives."

...when video evidence clearly shows you're wrong.

JB

I GET IT, IT'S MY ENGLISH THAT'S BOTHERING YOU.

Here is what I meant,

When using explosives for a demo job, all relevant areas of the building that need to be brought down in a particular direction, would have to be triggered off at the same time, in order to create the implosion in the required direction.

If it were an explosives demo job, and it clearly wasn't, the timing would have had to be really really precise, to the point of being impossible. i.e. 0.1 seconds per floor. LIKE there weren't thousands of eye witnesses there! Not to forget the people in the Towers, with their cell phones, calling their loved ones, who would have immediately been on the phone, had they heard any explosions.

Jesse Ventura says that there were sharp charges or something, clearly that is impossible!

The assertions are what the CPers are trying to make, not me. I am just trying to see if it is scientifically possible from an engineering point of view.

Haroki · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from Turok:

Rat:
>i've read theories on how it could have been done..

Me:
>How do the theories you've read address the key
>items in this post?

>http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...ote#post1874921

Rat's response (it total):
http://www.ae911truth.org/

OK Rat, I've spent a bit of time on that site and so far I can't fine a single reference to any of my points in that post. Seems you've sent me down a dead end. Can you be any more specific?

JB

Read a little about these assclowns over at JREF.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=105821

1000 · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from 1000:

6. No one can suggest why Cantor Fitzgerald was blown up, if it was a conspiracy? They would have been relocated, there is no doubt about that. The fact that Cantor Fitzgerald got blown up, proves that it was a terror attack and no one knew about it.

[/B]

1. No one can suggest why Cantor Fitzgerald was blown up, if it was a conspiracy? They would have been relocated, there is no doubt about that. The fact that Cantor Fitzgerald got blown up, proves that it was a terror attack and no one knew about it.

ratboy88 · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from Haroki:

Read a little about these assclowns over at JREF.

lmao.. you got that right... those randi pirates are definitely assclowns.

5Pillars · Apr 9, 2008

THE FACTS - Every single sub-story of the 9/11 events are ALL filled with MASSIVE discrepancies and LIES!!!!!

Oh, and since the U.S. has now admitted in NUMEROUS reports (even Chenney in a TV interview) that the U.S. can't officially be sure who carried out the 9/11 attacks, WHY THEN ARE WE NOT STILL INVESTIGATING THE EVIDENCE - Oh $hit we can't, as all the 9/11 WTC building debris was loaded and shipped by armed gaurd to.....................CHINA (where there is no ability for free press to EVER have access to any of the debris ever again).

http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm

Also - "New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg defends the decision to quickly get rid of the WTC steel, saying, âIf you want to take a look at the construction methods and the design, thatâs in this day and age what computers do. Just looking at a piece of metal generally doesnât tell you anything.â Officials in the mayorâs office decline to reply to requests by the New York Times regarding who decided to have the steel recycled." [New York Times, 12/25/2001; Eastday, 1/24/2002]

SUB-STORY deception and discrepancies -------

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1236

http://www.infowars.com/?p=1074

http://www.infowars.com/?p=913

"Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga has revealed that most intelligence agencies are aware of the inside involvement in the events of 9/11. Mr Fujita revealed he had met Mr Meacher the former British environment minister who was sacked by Blair for coming out and stating that 9/11 was a cover-up."

http://www.infowars.com/?p=886

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm

IT JUST DOES NOT ALL ADD UP - NOT ONE F^%^%^& BIT!!!!!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html

Hey "1000" and all your buds - answer all these questions pal! :eek:

Haroki · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from 5Pillars:

answer all these questions pal! :eek:

it's all very easy to explain.

Like Ratboy, you're also a delusional paranoid fruitcake that needs psychological help.

You have a warped, twisted view of the world. This is a defense mechanism that the mentally damaged individual's mind constructs for themselves in order to shield themselves from the harsh reality that they're losers.

Too bad for you.........

ratboy88 · Apr 9, 2008

Quote from Haroki:

it's all very easy to explain.

Like Ratboy, you're also a delusional paranoid fruitcake that needs psychological help.

You have a warped, twisted view of the world. This is a defense mechanism that the mentally damaged individual's mind constructs for themselves in order to shield themselves from the harsh reality that they're losers.

Too bad for you.........

Q. how do you know hiroshi is lying?

A. his beak is moving.

5Pillars · Apr 10, 2008

Quote from ratboy88:

Q. how do you know hiroshi is lying?

A. his beak is moving.

And he also did not serve in the U.S. military in the capacity that I did - inside jobs are nothing new for this country when lead by the puppets of the global entities.

You can also see they never have any answers - just deflections!

Jayford · Apr 10, 2008

Quote from Hydroblunt:

The Popular Mechanics arguments are selective and easily debatable. The editor is related to the Bush family & administration. Also, most of their explanations are very unique & elaborate. Basically, in their eyes, the cards just happened to line up perfectly by coincidence, hence the official story.

Try again. The head of their research department is a distant cousin to Michael Chertoff. He has never even met the guy!

I love the following quote from PM's editor, which basically sums up the immediate response to PM's piece from the conspiracy industry (and it is an industry).

"In a few short weeks, Popular Mechanics had gone from being a 100-year-old journal about science, engineering, car maintenance, and home improvement to being a pivotal player in a global conspiracy on a par with Nazi Germany."