What miracle drug? You can't count either?
It is not a miracle drug either. Ellucidate yourself so others on this board don't see you as a parroting TDS fool.
For the dumb hydroxychloroquine cultists
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
It is not a miracle drug either. Ellucidate yourself so others on this board don't see you as a parroting TDS fool.
Writing TDS makes a fool, as does writing LOL.
This virus has a cure - it is called hydroxychloroquine, I have treated over 350 patients and not had one death," said Dr Immanuel.
No deaths, everyone cured = Miracle
350 patients = Gives a count
Another embarrassing moment for the resident Trump Dick Sucker.
Are you stupid? How do you know that she is lying?
Since misinformation is in vogue with just about everything, how about this:
An inverse relationship between smoking and Covid:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200615/An-inverse-relationship-between-smoking-and-COVID-19.aspx
So for those non smokers who are looking for a little extra protection against Covid...
Of course, the WHO has a (Only slightly) different take:
https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/smoking-and-covid-19
Never mind common sense. That would be playing unfair.
So if we are not going to allow ourselves to use common sense, how do we decide who to trust?
Follow the money. The multi-billion dollar tobacco industry has a history of denying the harmful effects of smoking. Have they gone further and are now funding “Studies” that serve to protect their interests? Or is the nonprofit World Health Organization (WHO) whose fundamental objective revolves around good health practices the one we should trust?
EMTs almost universally talk about the differences in outcomes of car accidents between smokers and non smokers that involves the chest. Trauma to a smokers chest tends to cause potentially fatal lung swelling. Is it probably safe to assume that smoking itself is a comorbidity concerning Covid-19 outcomes due to reduced oxgenation potential, physical lung damage, and tendency for high blood pressure.
Another example is Chloroquine is cheap and has been shown to be effective in the early treatment or prevention of Covid infection by seemingly unbiased research group(s). After all, funding for studies that don’t provide a high profit margin solution are scarce relative to studies that promote a high profit margin solution, aren’t they? By extension, it seems reasonable to assume that a pharmeceutical company with a product to sell might be interested in impeaching a cheaper alternative.
From Wikipedia.org on the American Medical Association:
Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman as well as his wife, Rose Friedman, have claimed that the organization acts as a guild and has attempted to increase physicians' wages and fees by influencing limitations on the supply of physicians and competition from non-physicians. In the book Free to Choose, the Friedmans stated that "the AMA has engaged in extensive litigation charging chiropractors and osteopathic physicians with the unlicensed practice of medicine, in an attempt to restrict them to as narrow an area as possible."[85]Profession and Monopoly also criticized the AMA for limiting the supply of physicians and inflating the cost of medical care in the U.S as well as its influence on hospital regulation.[86] In a 1987 antitrust court case, a federal district judge called the AMA's behavior toward chiropractors "systematic, long-term wrongdoing". The AMA was accused of limiting the associations between physicians and chiropractors. In the 1960s and 1970s, the association's Committee on Quackery was said to have targeted the chiropractic profession, and for many years the AMA held that it was unethical for physicians to refer patients to chiropractors or to receive referrals from chiropractors.[87]
Extensive corruption issues surround the medical profession. Critically read the studies, think for yourself, and follow the money.
Bugenhagen, you should know better. Unless...
An inverse relationship between smoking and Covid:
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200615/An-inverse-relationship-between-smoking-and-COVID-19.aspx
So for those non smokers who are looking for a little extra protection against Covid...
Of course, the WHO has a (Only slightly) different take:
https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/smoking-and-covid-19
Never mind common sense. That would be playing unfair.
So if we are not going to allow ourselves to use common sense, how do we decide who to trust?
Follow the money. The multi-billion dollar tobacco industry has a history of denying the harmful effects of smoking. Have they gone further and are now funding “Studies” that serve to protect their interests? Or is the nonprofit World Health Organization (WHO) whose fundamental objective revolves around good health practices the one we should trust?
EMTs almost universally talk about the differences in outcomes of car accidents between smokers and non smokers that involves the chest. Trauma to a smokers chest tends to cause potentially fatal lung swelling. Is it probably safe to assume that smoking itself is a comorbidity concerning Covid-19 outcomes due to reduced oxgenation potential, physical lung damage, and tendency for high blood pressure.
Another example is Chloroquine is cheap and has been shown to be effective in the early treatment or prevention of Covid infection by seemingly unbiased research group(s). After all, funding for studies that don’t provide a high profit margin solution are scarce relative to studies that promote a high profit margin solution, aren’t they? By extension, it seems reasonable to assume that a pharmeceutical company with a product to sell might be interested in impeaching a cheaper alternative.
From Wikipedia.org on the American Medical Association:
Nobel Memorial Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman as well as his wife, Rose Friedman, have claimed that the organization acts as a guild and has attempted to increase physicians' wages and fees by influencing limitations on the supply of physicians and competition from non-physicians. In the book Free to Choose, the Friedmans stated that "the AMA has engaged in extensive litigation charging chiropractors and osteopathic physicians with the unlicensed practice of medicine, in an attempt to restrict them to as narrow an area as possible."[85]Profession and Monopoly also criticized the AMA for limiting the supply of physicians and inflating the cost of medical care in the U.S as well as its influence on hospital regulation.[86] In a 1987 antitrust court case, a federal district judge called the AMA's behavior toward chiropractors "systematic, long-term wrongdoing". The AMA was accused of limiting the associations between physicians and chiropractors. In the 1960s and 1970s, the association's Committee on Quackery was said to have targeted the chiropractic profession, and for many years the AMA held that it was unethical for physicians to refer patients to chiropractors or to receive referrals from chiropractors.[87]
Extensive corruption issues surround the medical profession. Critically read the studies, think for yourself, and follow the money.
Bugenhagen, you should know better. Unless...
You had put me on ignore once, remember?
You ready to be pounced in that TDS brain of yours with more truth about the evils of the left?
I didn't say she is lying, I pointed out that she had the miracle cure by claiming not a single death from covid - so why wasn't this miracle cure not being given to Cain? And if he was indeed given the cure, why is he dead?
It's a simple question, Georgia is a Republican run state, there is no ban on the miracle cure and yet Cain is dead.
Explain the contradictions.
Yea, do that
“I stand by it,” Navarro said. “I’m sitting on millions of doses of it.”
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-p...d-19-minute-slugfest-with-john-berman-on-cnn/
As everyone else does, I read the first couple of lines and the last of your posts. Something about smoking being protective. As an ex smoker but starting around 30 I recall no longer getting sore throats. Smoking was initially prescribed for chest infections, there is certainly some beneficial effect but everything in moderation.
Dunno, not surprised if the inverse relationship is real but its not going to sell cigarettes.
Good question, for which I also would like an answer. I would have expected Cain to get the combo the second he knew he was sick.
That's what I would take. How about you?