Hey stu
it's deo volente to you
it's deo volente to you
For my Christians Friends
- Thread starter nyxtrader
- Start date
Looks like the pile of stu argument is back...the thoughtless foundation of stu's argument is still shit being shit on shit...
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1918951>
<img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1918951>
For Pete's sake, stop taking the bait: put ZZZZ, etc on ignore already.
It is obvious this person is a troll and a narcissist who just wants people to notice.
As a result, this thread is dead.
Those who wish to attempt to engage this person is reasoned debate should do so on PM, so as to spare the rest of us.
Many thanks in advance.
It is obvious this person is a troll and a narcissist who just wants people to notice.
As a result, this thread is dead.
Those who wish to attempt to engage this person is reasoned debate should do so on PM, so as to spare the rest of us.
Many thanks in advance.
Description of Poisoning the Well
This sort of "reasoning" involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or false) about the person. This "argument" has the following form:
1. Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented.
2. Therefore any claims person A makes will be false.
This sort of "reasoning" is obviously fallacious. The person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make. However, merely presenting unfavorable information about a person (even if it is true) hardly counts as evidence against the claims he/she might make. This is especially clear when Poisoning the Well is looked at as a form of ad Homimem in which the attack is made prior to the person even making the claim or claims.
...so much for smilingsynic's concept of "reasoned debate."
This sort of "reasoning" involves trying to discredit what a person might later claim by presenting unfavorable information (be it true or false) about the person. This "argument" has the following form:
1. Unfavorable information (be it true or false) about person A is presented.
2. Therefore any claims person A makes will be false.
This sort of "reasoning" is obviously fallacious. The person making such an attack is hoping that the unfavorable information will bias listeners against the person in question and hence that they will reject any claims he might make. However, merely presenting unfavorable information about a person (even if it is true) hardly counts as evidence against the claims he/she might make. This is especially clear when Poisoning the Well is looked at as a form of ad Homimem in which the attack is made prior to the person even making the claim or claims.
...so much for smilingsynic's concept of "reasoned debate."
Quote from smilingsynic:
For Pete's sake, stop taking the bait: put ZZZZ, etc on ignore already.
It is obvious this person is a troll and a narcissist who just wants people to notice.
As a result, this thread is dead.
Those who wish to attempt to engage this person is reasoned debate should do so on PM, so as to spare the rest of us.
Many thanks in advance.
There is a correlation between the "reality" of this world and atheism. If this world is real, then God is either A.) insane, or, B.)dead, or, C.)non-existent.
You'll find that the "reality" of this world is the atheists religion...a belief held quite dogmatically...a faith taken for granted, such that it is not even recognized as faith.
On the contrary, the world is actually nothing [bald, no hair/no reality] which we are told is *something* [hair color].
Get it now?
I am something of an expert on parables, comparisons and analogies. So don't even go there.
Jesus
Because I already proved nonexistence of santa when i busted my dad as a child. Do you have proof of nonexistence of God or are you just basing your belief on faith alone that you are right with your close minded thinking ?
V00:
>Because I already proved nonexistence of santa
>when i busted my dad as a child.
Please explain how "busting your dad as a child" proved the nonexistence of santa.
Really, please do.
V00:
>Do you have proof of nonexistence of God or are you
>just basing your belief on faith alone that you are right
>with your close minded thinking ?
You must be forgetting that I've repeatedly stated that I'm an agnostic. I don't claim that god doesn't exist and never have.
JB
>Because I already proved nonexistence of santa
>when i busted my dad as a child.
Please explain how "busting your dad as a child" proved the nonexistence of santa.
Really, please do.
V00:
>Do you have proof of nonexistence of God or are you
>just basing your belief on faith alone that you are right
>with your close minded thinking ?
You must be forgetting that I've repeatedly stated that I'm an agnostic. I don't claim that god doesn't exist and never have.
JB
Click... whirrr.... The Troll Translator translates:
Whenever I've run out of different ways to state my mindless assertions, whenever I've exhausted my seemingly inexhaustible supply of moral-relativist claptrap and am unable to compose any more self-referential nonsense, I start posting bizarre images.
Where do I find the time to collect so many weird images, you ask? In light of this...
Profile For The Disgusting Alcoholic Troll
Date Registered: 06-14-04
Total Posts: 21067 (16.59 posts per day every day for 4 years under this username, not counting the posts I made under other usernames, before I was banned twice for being a childish idiot)
I can understand the question. Instead of answering the question, I will cut and paste this post and submit it as a reply without adding any text, which is the other thing I do when I want to take my whinging idiot ball and go home. If things are going really badly, I may threaten anal penetration.
Oh, by the way... I used to be a Christian, then I converted to another religion. I then converted back to Christianity. I converted again. I have now converted back yet again. I'm not sure what I am now.
Click.... whirr.......