14% will require some hospitalization but, only 2.5%, the most severe will perish.
You are way more pessimistic than i am.
If no measures are taken then, I calculate:
Around 4% will require hospital (10 million).
0.6% will perish (over 1million).
Your figures (14% and 2.5%) would mean over 30 million in hospital and over 5 million dead.
You are way more pessimistic than i am.
If no measures are taken then, I calculate:
Around 4% will require hospital (10 million).
0.6% will perish (over 1million).
Your figures (14% and 2.5%) would mean over 30 million in hospital and over 5 million dead.
You are pulling figures out of your ass. Where did you get your figures? Projections by political hacks out to sensationalize and panic everyone? None of it proven accurate, none of it even close to reality.
Dozu— since you are very adamant about your ‘predictions’ -which would be very easy to ‘validate’ or ‘disproved’ in several months — would you at least promise us that you will vanish from ET if you are proven wrong? In case you are proven correct - I promise to hail you the KING888this is what I meant by 'talking to a bunch of deaf and blind people'.... already laid out why it's 200k death tops and you are still throwing around 1 million death.
but let me give you that 1 million, I also just made a post that the panic drag on the GDP alone is already equivalent to 1 million death.
there is always an 'easy solution'... you put everything in numbers, either a>b or a<b.
easy.
Read this:You made things up. Wuhan has 3000 dead on 10 million population. Do the math again.
wuhan is already a full population spread. Patient zero was 2 months before the lock down.
Read this:
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/finding-important-information-about-china.342413/
https://nypost.com/2020/03/28/shipm...questions-about-chinas-coronavirus-reporting/
You came from there and told us many times the Government there made up numbers to fit their agenda and now you are quoting the official data?