Fiscal cliff

Quote from mrbill:

I've been agreeing with many of your posts lately, CO. I would hope that both sides would put the American people first, not worrying about whether or not the Dem's or Obama get some credit. The last couple of years have been wasted trying to avoid anything of value to the U.S. for fear it might make the current Administration look good. Lame Duck time now, let's get some stuff done.

It's lame duck for one guy. The parties are always positioning themselves to take credit or lay blame. It's how the system works. We need to get some stuff done, but make no mistake, people will take credit and/or lay blame. Team Obama and the dems are in a much stronger position if the repubs play ball at all. When they strike a deal, they'll be saying, if the stubborn bastards would have done this a couple years ago the economy would have improved sooner and stronger. Maybe it would have, maybe not, but it's the kind of unprovable argument Obama is famous for. Both sides will be calling the other stubborn and they'll both be right, but the dems will come out smelling better for the mid term elections. Politically speaking, that's a kick in the nut's for repubs.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

It's lame duck for one guy. The parties are always positioning themselves to take credit or lay blame. It's how the system works. We need to get some stuff done, but make no mistake, people will take credit and/or lay blame. Team Obama and the dems are in a much stronger position if the repubs play ball at all. When they strike a deal, they'll be saying, if the stubborn bastards would have done this a couple years ago the economy would have improved sooner and stronger. Maybe it would have, maybe not, but it's the kind of unprovable argument Obama is famous for. Both sides will be calling the other stubborn and they'll both be right, but the dems will come out smelling better for the mid term elections. Politically speaking, that's a kick in the nut's for repubs.
" the economy would have improved sooner and stronger. Maybe it would have, maybe not, but it's the kind of unprovable argument Obama is famous for." Romney and Ryan are now famous for that argument, too. Not that they'll be back.
 
Quote from Ricter:

And that scenario will not add one day to your life. Not one.

Who is trying to add days to their life?

A collapse results in a reversion to what works and what is sustainable. Until then, the spending addict has no incentive to change.
 
The dems are in charge, Obama in the White House, and a democratic senate. It is now up to obama to come up with a plan to avoid the fiscal cliff which will guarantee extreme tax hikes on the rich and middle class. The republican congress won't pass these tax hikes. The result will be the default fiscal cliff which is the expiration of Bush tax cuts and the sequestor. Which is expected to reduce GDP by 2-4% and cause a recession.

It seems to me the republicans have the upper hand, all they have to do is what Obama has done the last four years and that is nothing. The republicans just need to let the economy crash over the cliff, let the Dems take responsibilty and reap the rewards in 2014/2016.
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

It's lame duck for one guy. The parties are always positioning themselves to take credit or lay blame. It's how the system works. We need to get some stuff done, but make no mistake, people will take credit and/or lay blame. Team Obama and the dems are in a much stronger position if the repubs play ball at all. When they strike a deal, they'll be saying, if the stubborn bastards would have done this a couple years ago the economy would have improved sooner and stronger. Maybe it would have, maybe not, but it's the kind of unprovable argument Obama is famous for. Both sides will be calling the other stubborn and they'll both be right, but the dems will come out smelling better for the mid term elections. Politically speaking, that's a kick in the nut's for repubs.

Fair enough.
 
Here's what will happen.

Republicans and Democrats will agree to let upper income cuts expire. The Dems will let the cap rise to say 500k or 1 million so the Repubs can go along.

They will ALL agree to serious tax/entitlement reform.............LATER.

Anyone want to wager?



:D
 
Quote from Arnie:

Here's what will happen.

Republicans and Democrats will agree to let upper income cuts expire. The Dems will let the cap rise to say 500k or 1 million so the Repubs can go along.

They will ALL agree to serious tax/entitlement reform.............LATER.

Anyone want to wager?



:D

That's what they always do in one form or another -- kick the can down the road.

Tax increases are always certain and immediate. Spending cuts are promises made for some ambiguous time in the distant future. That's the game.
 
Quote from tomdavis:

That's what they always do in one form or another -- kick the can down the road.

Tax increases are always certain and immediate. Spending cuts are promises made for some ambiguous time in the distant future. That's the game.

And there's a very good reason why they do that.
 
Quote from Arnie:

And there's a very good reason why they do that.

Yes. They have no intention of making the spending cuts. All they want to do is create the illusion cutting spending. It's just the same lame trick over and over again. Most people are too stupid to see it.
 
Quote from TGregg:

Nope. Congress can pass an extension. I fully expect the democrats to kick this can down the road anywhere from a few months to a full year (to Dec 31, 2013). Then I expect The One to play hardball. And I expect the republicans to cave. I mean, what choice will they have? If they stand their ground, everything goes to shit and the media will be running stories 24x7 for the entire 2014 year screaming about how republicans are to blame. Then they'll get slaughtered in the midterms, voters being too busy watching American Idol to have any clue about politics.

hey let's don't pretend the media is going to do anything other than lie and carry water for the dempcraps.
 
Back
Top