The US is more likely to start a war or nuke someone than NK is imo .If you are going all the way back to the first war I agree China is at fault.
Fire and Fury!
- Thread starter Optionpro007
- Start date
The US is more likely to start a war or nuke someone than NK is imo .If you are going all the way back to the first war I agree China is at fault.
From the aforementioned interview.
"Taking out their nuclear potential would create a fallout," Russert pointed out.
Trump: "Tim, do you know that this country gave them nuclear reactors, free fuel for 10 years."
Did they. Bad America. Or...
The reality is that before 1989 North Korea was protected by the cold war. After.. well it was pretty busy in the 90s with the USSR falling apart, the Balkans etc, after that it was useful to have a low risk bogeyman to scare the public with, Canadian Bacon in the refrigerator.
The US has followed a doctrine of "perpetual conflict" since WWII as part of it's defense strategy, that is open and admitted. Keep finding ways to keep the troops sharp and the M.I. Complex well fed. Maintain a low level fever in the world to exploit for arms sales and bases etc etc.
Not dealing with North Korea was clearly intentional. Wag the dog. There is no risk from them any more than there has been for decades already. It is theater.
Let Kim JU feel personally safe, convince him he will not be a Saddam II and that is all required.
The game is not what the public thinks, the goal is to keep the US public thinking small.
"Taking out their nuclear potential would create a fallout," Russert pointed out.
Trump: "Tim, do you know that this country gave them nuclear reactors, free fuel for 10 years."
Did they. Bad America. Or...
The reality is that before 1989 North Korea was protected by the cold war. After.. well it was pretty busy in the 90s with the USSR falling apart, the Balkans etc, after that it was useful to have a low risk bogeyman to scare the public with, Canadian Bacon in the refrigerator.
The US has followed a doctrine of "perpetual conflict" since WWII as part of it's defense strategy, that is open and admitted. Keep finding ways to keep the troops sharp and the M.I. Complex well fed. Maintain a low level fever in the world to exploit for arms sales and bases etc etc.
Not dealing with North Korea was clearly intentional. Wag the dog. There is no risk from them any more than there has been for decades already. It is theater.
Let Kim JU feel personally safe, convince him he will not be a Saddam II and that is all required.
The game is not what the public thinks, the goal is to keep the US public thinking small.
IMO that is the only reason Kim has nukes.I also think that is the only reason he would use them.
their nuke program went into overdrive when they saw the billions Obama gave Iran.
Obama's watch, Obama's actions and inactions... Obama was their accomplice.
Obama's watch, Obama's actions and inactions... Obama was their accomplice.
then.... accomplice Obama was on notice and he should have stopped it.
Now the world is at risk of a nuclear bombing via missles.
as you used to say as AK Forty Seven...
Nice job Mr. President.
Now the world is at risk of a nuclear bombing via missles.
as you used to say as AK Forty Seven...
Nice job Mr. President.
Nuclear bombing via "missles"? Sounds cute. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=missles
There will be no missiles. Trump just needs a bump.
I will admit to having quite a strong sense of deja-moo with another dementia afflicted US president in power. We got through it last time.. Nuke - Nurse?
"That's one heck of a nurse!"
Last edited:
that is like saying your not your father's son because it took your mom to 9 - 10 months to delivery you. Obama was President for 8 years during the gestation of this missile program.