Trump works for himself, period, so the idea he's working for Hillary is "crazy talk". I agree with the rest of what you said, though, so I'll give you a like; since I'm a commie and you're under 100.
To each according to his needs.
Fiorina Hits the Ball out of the park on this one
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
To each according to his needs.
Trump works for himself, period, so the idea he's working for Hillary is "crazy talk". I agree with the rest of what you said, though, so I'll give you a like; since I'm a commie and you're under 100.
To each according to his needs.
Ohhh I am not saying Trump is working with Hillary strictly to help Hillary. He is planning to get something out of the deal, no doubt. We know the Clintons are very much into the whole quid pro quo thing and they will deliver on their end. Just ask Mark Rich.
So what is her position. She never answered the question. Other than to say she favors "exceptions". She did a good job of mischaracterizing Clinton's position, but what's hers? She succinctly summarized the position of the populace according to polls, but what is HER position?
She lied about Clinton's position repeatedly, and I am no Clinton supporter. Lying is a serious fault to me. Exaggerating one own record is par for the course when it comes to politicians, but bold face lies are quite another matter. In this one interview she disqualified herself as a candidate I could support. She's annoying. She's a barracuda. I can see now why see wrecked HP. She's going to let personal animosities bias her opinion, and try to destroy any one who challenges her. (I know that type. They are disasters in leadership roles.) She hates Clinton and she is letting her animosity show through in full force. This is a terrible trait for anyone put in a position where diplomacy is needed. She's dangerous.
She said Clinton's position was that women seeking an abortion should not be permitted to look at an ultrasound. Clinton's position is that they should not be required to look at an ultra sound. That's a world of difference. Fiorina said it was Hillary's position that it is not a life until it leaves the hospital. This is a bold faced lie, of course. It's so ridiculous, we can see she is clearly not in control of her emotional state. Then she tried to tie Hillary into organ harvesting!
I don't believe you guys realize what a disastrous interview you have just witnessed.
This Fiorina woman is as bad as Trump in her own way. My god. Why do you guys give her such an easy time? Don't you listen to what she is actually saying. She's dangerous. And I just now realized it. Up to now I thought she was a candidate worth listening to. Now she scares the hell out of me. She may be a psycho. Seriously.
Some of the things that happened at HP are now becoming a little more clear to me.
Last edited:
No, I'm dead serious. Listen to the interview again with a critical ear.. You heard what you wanted to her, not what she said, which was lies about clinton and what the polls said people favored with regard to abortion. She never said what Her position is. She, except for saying she was on record regarding exceptions, never said what her position was. She wants you to assume it is the same as the polls. She was so worked up about Clinton, she couldn't calm down long enough to state succinctly and honestly what her own position was. She is a fucking snake in the grass. An unstable, dangerous woman.
Lighten up pie. This is politics, not golf. We need some candidates who are not afraid to hit below the belt. We've had nothing but weak pussies the last two elections.
I don't know that her characterizations were all that far off the mark either. It is the official position of Hillary and all dems that any criticism of Planned Parenthood's gruesome baby parts business is nothing less than an attack on women's access to health care. Several prominent democrats have stated that a baby does not have a right to life until it leaves the hospital, Nancy Pelosi among them. I don't recall Hillary disagreeing or even being asked because of course the media only asks republicans about troublesome statements. She and her husband were perfectly ok with partial birth abortion. Quibbling about "required" versus "permitted" seems disingenuous. These are women who will see an ultrasound only if it is required.
I don't know that her characterizations were all that far off the mark either. It is the official position of Hillary and all dems that any criticism of Planned Parenthood's gruesome baby parts business is nothing less than an attack on women's access to health care. Several prominent democrats have stated that a baby does not have a right to life until it leaves the hospital, Nancy Pelosi among them. I don't recall Hillary disagreeing or even being asked because of course the media only asks republicans about troublesome statements. She and her husband were perfectly ok with partial birth abortion. Quibbling about "required" versus "permitted" seems disingenuous. These are women who will see an ultrasound only if it is required.
You can keep your insurance.
You can keep your doctor.
You'll save twenty five hundred dollars.
LOL, you are a nut. A grade A nut.
However there have been a number of vice presidents with broad business experience but limited political experience - keep this in mind. Many of these candidates are really trying to position themselves for the second slot on the ticket. Carly Fiorina has done a good job at this point.
If she can get on the stage with the top 10 in the next debate then she may likely be a strong vice-presidential contender by the end of the process.
And she would be a good vice-presidential candidate and an asset to the ticket - eloquent and reasonable - nothing like Palin.