Finally !!! ASK QUESTIONS, DEMAND ANSWERS.
- Thread starter total180
- Start date
There's nothing like blabbering on about a massive conspiracy run by money and power that's already killed thousands of people to draw attention to yourself. Not the kind of attention one would wish for, however.
Listen at night for a stealthy approach of an assassin. Might be the last thing you ever hear.
You should sleep well, though. Chances are they'd rather nail you in a seeming accident while you are out in public. Maybe another terrorist attack, even.
Listen at night for a stealthy approach of an assassin. Might be the last thing you ever hear.
You should sleep well, though. Chances are they'd rather nail you in a seeming accident while you are out in public. Maybe another terrorist attack, even.
Is there something wrong with the information at that web site?
The Zepruder film...are you not able to see a second shot that hits JFK from the right front, causing his head to jerk back?
Do you really think Oswald could have gotten off two or three hits with that rifle from behind the motorcade...let alone one like weve been told?
Flight 93 mushroom cloud (Shanksville, PA)
"The Missing Three Minutes
The government asserts that Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 AM. A seismic recording station recorded a major event at 10:06 AM. Seismic recordings are calibrated by atomic clocks which are incredibly accurate. Cleveland Air Traffic Control also had the flight on its radar at 10:06 AM. Again, the government story contradicts physical evidence. While this does not provide any proof that Flight 93 did not crash, it does illustrate government complicity."
??doesn't the flight 93 crash cloud seem awfully similar to this??
Ordnance Blast (Iraq)
ASK QUESTIONS DEMAND ANSWERS
Where are the plane remains? all collected in a 5 gallon bucket?
Take a look at the aerial video footage right after the "crash"
http://letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=34
More photos here
A 757 would not have just morphed into the ground, leaving no trace of parts. Not at ANY velocity!
http://www.geocities.com/hankmcintyre/911_report3.html
Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. If someone showed you these photos, without telling you anything about what caused them, Would you honestly ever conclude that it was a plane crash? Would anyone?
"The Missing Three Minutes
The government asserts that Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 AM. A seismic recording station recorded a major event at 10:06 AM. Seismic recordings are calibrated by atomic clocks which are incredibly accurate. Cleveland Air Traffic Control also had the flight on its radar at 10:06 AM. Again, the government story contradicts physical evidence. While this does not provide any proof that Flight 93 did not crash, it does illustrate government complicity."
??doesn't the flight 93 crash cloud seem awfully similar to this??
Ordnance Blast (Iraq)
ASK QUESTIONS DEMAND ANSWERS
Where are the plane remains? all collected in a 5 gallon bucket?
Take a look at the aerial video footage right after the "crash"
http://letsroll911.org/phpwebsite/index.php?module=announce&ANN_user_op=view&ANN_id=34
More photos here
A 757 would not have just morphed into the ground, leaving no trace of parts. Not at ANY velocity!
http://www.geocities.com/hankmcintyre/911_report3.html
Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. If someone showed you these photos, without telling you anything about what caused them, Would you honestly ever conclude that it was a plane crash? Would anyone?
here's a little hint
sometimes real life doesn't look like what you think it should look like.
where is your conception of what a plane crash "should" look like?
movies?
physics is weird. just ask feynman. oops he's dead. but you get the point...
i used to be a firefighter. seen a fair share of WEIRD stuff that results when objects collide at high velocity...
and then there is the exceptionally hot way that avfuel burns...
anyways... things don't always look like you think they should...
this is true of human being meets immovable object @ high speed as well
sometimes real life doesn't look like what you think it should look like.
where is your conception of what a plane crash "should" look like?
movies?
physics is weird. just ask feynman. oops he's dead. but you get the point...
i used to be a firefighter. seen a fair share of WEIRD stuff that results when objects collide at high velocity...
and then there is the exceptionally hot way that avfuel burns...
anyways... things don't always look like you think they should...
this is true of human being meets immovable object @ high speed as well
I hope you are not serious.
But just in case You have no preconception of what a plane crash "should" look like, here is a sample
There are currently 1,214 photographs, representing 354 accidents, in the gallery
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/
hit the ground fullspeed, 3 pics
http://www.airdisaster.com/photos/5b-dby/photo.shtml
Well at least we have some progress, we are at stage 2 these days. Carry on.
my point... and i have been on the scene of 2 aircrashes firsthand, is that you have no idea what you are talking about
a jetliner hitting the ground at fullspeed can leave any # of different crash patterns depending on such a variety of factors
i realize the black helicopter crew is alive and well.
carry on
a jetliner hitting the ground at fullspeed can leave any # of different crash patterns depending on such a variety of factors
i realize the black helicopter crew is alive and well.
carry on