Quote from TraderZones:
you seem to forget when you first came onto ET pushing your book, people basically dismissed your turtle book as you being a wannabe. Your earlier assertion that your book is any kind of a defining work is wishful thinking.
I realize how difficult it is to argue with someone not all there, but I will try!
Some feedback from others about my book who may know something about the subject:
"I did enjoy the book...I hope it's doing well for you."
Original Turtle Tom Shanks
"The book was wonderful..."
Original Turtle Michael Shannon
"Liked it. Congratulations on a job well done."
Original Turtle Jeff Gordon
"Book is very good...thank you for going for the truth and objectivity."
Original Turtle Lucy Wyatt
"Nice book."
Original Turtle Russell Sands
"All in all, not bad. I wish it had never been done and I wish I were not in it, but I know that you were definitely going to do it, so I figured I would try to get the truth out as much as possible. By and large, it worked that way."
Original Turtle Jim DiMaria
Not to mention the numerous other Turtles I have spoken with since the book has been released -- who praise it. Now if memory holds correct much of that criticism in ET was started and came from the Turtle whose firm imploded ending with the CFTC investigation. In hindsight there may have been reasons for his criticism. This was all discussed in my book too BTW. Bottom line, you are aware that there was more than one Turtle?