Federal Study Shows Illegals are More likely to be Criminals

The report states very directly that immigration offenses are excluded.

Actually -- seeing that illegal immigrants represent approx 3.5% of the U.S. population and the percent of criminals locked up in federal prison for non-immigration offenses is 7.3% -- this represents a very strong argument for stronger enforcement against illegal immigration.

The argument even gets stronger for proper enforcement when you include illegal immigrants locked up for non-immigration crime in state prisons where they represent over 9% of the state prison population in most states.

Now you are talking about something else, we are discussing the articles and their BS study, you are talking about something else and pretending it's the same topic to give cover to jem and his anti-immigrant talk
 
I don't need cover... you are the one who had no facts.

Now you are talking about something else, we are discussing the articles and their BS study, you are talking about something else and pretending it's the same topic to give cover to jem and his anti-immigrant talk
 
It should be noted that Cato Institute has zero credibility on immigration issues. They are part of the Koch Bros/Chamber of Commerce/Business Roundtable open borders, low wage caucus. The fact that a supposedly conservative/libertarian group has positions that mimic George Soros should tell you all you need to know.
 
Now you are talking about something else, we are discussing the articles and their BS study, you are talking about something else and pretending it's the same topic to give cover to jem and his anti-immigrant talk

Either you can believe the yearly reports on immigration and prisons created under the Obama administration with all the facts and figures ---- or you can live with your own personal reality regarding illegal immigration & crime.
 
Either you can believe the yearly reports on immigration and prisons created under the Obama administration with all the facts and figures ---- or you can live with your own personal reality regarding illegal immigration & crime.

It's not an either or question when you guys have been deceptive about presenting the data.
 
that was 62 to 38 percent.


Stoneridge is closed. The owner/developer wanted to develop it. However, it was zoned open space when he bought it. He paid for a referendum to change the zoning. He was voted down 63 percent to 38 percent.

The layout was not bad it was just poorly maintained. If the owner was employing illegals (and I don't know that he was) attempting to bulldoze and turn it into homes did not work. Everybody told the guy Poway would not vote to change the zoning. Poway voted down previous measures to change zoning on other properties.
 
Interesting. A hotel going into Maderas was voted down in Nov. 2016.

I wonder if putting the Trump name on the hotel could get people in Poway to vote to change the zoning.

I heard a rumor that The Trumps are in negotiations to build a hotel at Maderas Golf Club.
 
Interesting. A hotel going into Maderas was voted down in Nov. 2016.

I wonder if putting the Trump name on the hotel could get people in Poway to vote to change the zoning.
Not after this Tax Bill boondoggle.
 
Back
Top