Fear and loathing in Las Vegas

If I can keep unbiased, the Independent/Moderate undecideds is even more confused than before. The only thing left is feel, and Clinton feels more presidential.
 
Trump just made a colossal mistake that resonates with women: "Such a nasty woman".

Over what? On top of it, he has been interrupting. Edge Clinton for sure.
 
I think it was a slight edge Clinton. But I saw the other two debates. Trump has to win over more than his base, and I don't see it.
 
nitro said:
Well, let's not get carried away. Regardless of who wins this election, a recession is expected by most economists in 2017. The question is how bad. Not, if...

Trump's policies, with the exception of his trade policies, do nothing to address the problems the middle class is having.
More...
I think that it is probable that the US will enter recession within the next 2 years.

However, please post a link that demonstrates that "most" economist expect a recession in 2017. If that is the case, I really want to read about it. Just guessing but I think it is probably somewhere around 1% of economist think that.
 
Once again, I realize how wrong I have been. Trump will keep his supporters and fellow conspiracy advocates. The rape charges, jnstead of ruining him, like they could be naively expected to do in the eyes of ordinary, good 'Christians,' and like I recklessly predicted they would do, will instead attract viewers to the Trump 'network'. It will be the same viewers that tune in for the Jerry Springer Show, interviews of death row inmates, programs featuring unsolved murders, or lesbian life in the female ward. It's the number of viewers that determines how much advertising revenue can be attracted. Outrageousness attracts viewers who will want to know whose pussy Trump will grab next.. I predict success for the new Trump network, initially at least. His other businesses? It is not looking quite so good for those.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top