If it is such a tiny percentage, why do the progressives obsess so over it? Clearly it is a barbaric procedure little different from infanticide. I frankly cannot fathom how any decent physician can do it. They must be callous monsters.
Fear and loathing in Las Vegas
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
If it is such a tiny percentage, why do the progressives obsess so over it? Clearly it is a barbaric procedure little different from infanticide. I frankly cannot fathom how any decent physician can do it. They must be callous monsters.
I think it will help you get on a somewhat even keel if you stop thinking of brains being sucked out by abortionists and start thinking of the human rights of those with an independent existence. Life is perhaps more complicated than we allow for in our arguments. These late term abortions are very rare. Perhaps if we increased funding for planned parenthood we could prevent some of them. That's something constructive you could do, advocate increased funding for planned parenthood!
Last edited:
You were the leftist drone who just called those siding with the human rights of the child about to be born - hyenas. you need to get off you leftist high horse and think for a minute before you write.
I so completely respect the rights of Americans who have different view on this even though I think it is barbaric to suck a humans brains out... I state that per the constitution this issues should be left up to a vote by the citizens of each state.
its dead ass wrong for 9 people to impose their personal belief on 300 million
this is clearly the collision of a women's right to kill a human in her body vs the rights of the human on the way out of her body and there is no clear right or wrong answer from a constitutional standpoint. Your side does not have the high ground on this issue from a morality standpoint by a long shot.
therefore this should be left for a vote in the states. And each state can have different laws.
I so completely respect the rights of Americans who have different view on this even though I think it is barbaric to suck a humans brains out... I state that per the constitution this issues should be left up to a vote by the citizens of each state.
its dead ass wrong for 9 people to impose their personal belief on 300 million
this is clearly the collision of a women's right to kill a human in her body vs the rights of the human on the way out of her body and there is no clear right or wrong answer from a constitutional standpoint. Your side does not have the high ground on this issue from a morality standpoint by a long shot.
therefore this should be left for a vote in the states. And each state can have different laws.
Last edited:
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,1940. currently prohibits anyone, without a permitissued by the Secretary of the Interior, from "taking" bald eagles. Taking is described to include their parts, nests, or eggs, molesting or disturbing the birds. The Act provides criminalpenalties for persons who "take, possess, sell, purchase, barter, offer to sell, purchase or barter, transport, export or import, at any time or any manner, any bald eagle ... [or any golden eagle], alive or dead, or any part, nest, or egg thereof."
The Federal Government feels more strongly about unborn eagles than it does unborn humans
The Federal Government feels more strongly about unborn eagles than it does unborn humans
FWIW,
I almost stopped reading what you wrote, but I am glad I finished it. I recommend you hook your reader first by stating the conclusion at the bottom, and reverse the top to the bottom. Then I and I suspect others would have a greater chance of reading because you shock them first. Then you use logic drill home the point. People that think for a living will be able to tell almost instantly if you are spinning, or if you have a point.
I don't agree with what you are saying, but I am having a hard time disambiguating why. So you have a point, imo.
The bald eagle has way more freedom than you want for America's women. The bald Eagle is free to devour their young without interference from the government.
ron paul did not confuse anything. maybe its the filters you employ when taking in truth that conflicts with your team's big govt less liberty loving, ferguson protest funding, soros owned lie/spin.
And yet you believe Health Care is a Right? Correct me if I'm wrong?JEM, are you one of Trumps wild, charging hyenas ?These things you are trying to bait me into commenting on here on ET have many nuances, and they have been discussed ad nauseum already in expert forums and in the court. And the court has spoken. You want to know my opinion. It is the same as the court's. I trust the patient to make these very serious and grave decisions in consultation with expert advice from their physician. Unlike the wild hyenas who what the government to dictate to women what they can do with their bodies, I am a true Libertarian. I don't want government telling me what to do with my body or telling anyone else what to do with theirs. And I don't want a wild, crackpot, religious hyena to try and force their weird ideas on any of the rest of us.