FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal, Netting Clintons Millions
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
and multiple times I have shown you that we lost track of uranium as it went up to Canada.
If Mueller turned up a tenth of this involving Trump, they would be demanding his impeachment. With Clintons, it is just business as usual.
If a republican got elected president however, we would control the DOJ and FBI and could pursue this to its logical conclusion. Oh wait...Trump's DOJ thought it was a better idea to investigate him instead.
If a republican got elected president however, we would control the DOJ and FBI and could pursue this to its logical conclusion. Oh wait...Trump's DOJ thought it was a better idea to investigate him instead.
look it up yourself. stop douching and deflecting.
you can find statements I made in 300 page threads when you wish...
you can find statements I made in 300 page threads when you wish...
back to the topic...
here someone else sees the national security issues...
this is really bad...
how do we know that those investigating Trump were not already compromised...
but its bigger than this Trump investigation...
How do we know that Putin does not have dirt on a whole host of people still in the swamp... from this Uranimum One deal and others.
Seriously... why on earth would the FBI not say something while Obama was in office and cutting deals involving uranium to Russia and then Iran and Nuclear deals with Iran.
What the hell is going on? I would never expect our FBI to be that compromised. Infected by the cult of Clinton and Obama yes... but not speaking up about Nuclear issues?
Please investigate so we can know our security agencies are not compromised.
“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials. At a minimum, as Noah Rothman notes, the involvement of key members of the current Trump-Russia probe in conducting this investigation will play right into Trump’s hands in his campaign to discredit the investigation, and Democrats thus far seem likely to just circle the wagons against any further inquiry for that reason as well as how this reflects on the Clintons, Eric Holder, and the Obama Administration’s Russia policy. But the national security implications run deeper than that, and as Ed Morrissey observes, Congress ought to dig in further to see what else it wasn’t told: House Intelligence chair Mike Rogers claimed to the Hill that no one ever mentioned the case at all to him, despite already-extant concerns over the Uranium One deal on Capitol Hill. That smells like a political cover-up of the first magnitude. Rather than hyperventilate over Facebook ads and Twitter trolls, perhaps Congress and the current Department of Justice should look into what the FBI found in 2009-10, how much of it benefited Bill and Hillary Clinton — and why the DoJ and the Obama administration never briefed the intelligence committees on this Russian collusion operation. Washington has an unfortunate tendency to back off investigations when there are skeletons on both sides of the partisan aisle. But a thorough airing of Russia’s multifaceted efforts to penetrate and disrupt American institutions (including the media) over the past decade is necessary in order to counter the threat of the Kremlin’s “war by other means” doctrine. Let the chips fall where they may.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/452776/russian-nuclear-scandal-what-did-hillary-clinton-know
here someone else sees the national security issues...
this is really bad...
how do we know that those investigating Trump were not already compromised...
but its bigger than this Trump investigation...
How do we know that Putin does not have dirt on a whole host of people still in the swamp... from this Uranimum One deal and others.
Seriously... why on earth would the FBI not say something while Obama was in office and cutting deals involving uranium to Russia and then Iran and Nuclear deals with Iran.
What the hell is going on? I would never expect our FBI to be that compromised. Infected by the cult of Clinton and Obama yes... but not speaking up about Nuclear issues?
Please investigate so we can know our security agencies are not compromised.
“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials. At a minimum, as Noah Rothman notes, the involvement of key members of the current Trump-Russia probe in conducting this investigation will play right into Trump’s hands in his campaign to discredit the investigation, and Democrats thus far seem likely to just circle the wagons against any further inquiry for that reason as well as how this reflects on the Clintons, Eric Holder, and the Obama Administration’s Russia policy. But the national security implications run deeper than that, and as Ed Morrissey observes, Congress ought to dig in further to see what else it wasn’t told: House Intelligence chair Mike Rogers claimed to the Hill that no one ever mentioned the case at all to him, despite already-extant concerns over the Uranium One deal on Capitol Hill. That smells like a political cover-up of the first magnitude. Rather than hyperventilate over Facebook ads and Twitter trolls, perhaps Congress and the current Department of Justice should look into what the FBI found in 2009-10, how much of it benefited Bill and Hillary Clinton — and why the DoJ and the Obama administration never briefed the intelligence committees on this Russian collusion operation. Washington has an unfortunate tendency to back off investigations when there are skeletons on both sides of the partisan aisle. But a thorough airing of Russia’s multifaceted efforts to penetrate and disrupt American institutions (including the media) over the past decade is necessary in order to counter the threat of the Kremlin’s “war by other means” doctrine. Let the chips fall where they may.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/452776/russian-nuclear-scandal-what-did-hillary-clinton-know
Last edited:
one other thought...
is there any doubt that Putin is one of the smartest, richest and most conniving sobs on the planet?
He sees uranium and he finds a way to compromise the Clintons, Obama and maybe the FBI.
if he had not then allowed it to go to Iran... I would be almost complimenting him.
But since it went to Iran I have to say that he has put much of the middle east and the US in jeopardy with that plan.
Finally... is this is not proof we have to get money out of politics... completely.
The US Supreme court should just make a new law... take judicial notice of this... and revisit their previous decision. Someone has to take the money out of politics and its not going to be establishment republicans or democrats.
Find a way to take the money out that is fair to all sides.
is there any doubt that Putin is one of the smartest, richest and most conniving sobs on the planet?
He sees uranium and he finds a way to compromise the Clintons, Obama and maybe the FBI.
if he had not then allowed it to go to Iran... I would be almost complimenting him.
But since it went to Iran I have to say that he has put much of the middle east and the US in jeopardy with that plan.
Finally... is this is not proof we have to get money out of politics... completely.
The US Supreme court should just make a new law... take judicial notice of this... and revisit their previous decision. Someone has to take the money out of politics and its not going to be establishment republicans or democrats.
Find a way to take the money out that is fair to all sides.
Last edited:
Julian Assange @JulianAssange
Julian Assange Retweeted Washington Post
Another false story in the Washington Post. The results are the opposite if you use the terms ("trump" and "tape" or "recording") that most TV news shows were using. Try for yourself: https://archive.org/details/tv
Julian Assange added,
Washington PostVerified account@washingtonpost
Analysis: On TV news, the 2016 campaign ended with more Comey and WikiLeaks than "Access Hollywood" http://wapo.st/2go5mY8
11:58 AM - 17 Oct 2017
New conversation
Julian Assange @JulianAssange 50m50 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange
Julian Assange Retweeted Peter Daou
Verrit founder pushes new fake story in the Washington Post
Julian Assange added,
Peter DaouVerified account@peterdaou
UPDATE: New analysis shows that Comey and WikiLeaks got more coverage than Trump's bus tape. That's egregious. https://verrit.com/harvard-study-mainstream-media-acted-as-trumps-mouth-piece-clintons-foe/…
30 replies357 retweets625 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 46m46 minutes ago
And Hillary Clinton pushed Verrit
1 reply8 retweets15 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 46m46 minutes ago
When Verrit only had 3k followers
1 reply2 retweets9 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 45m45 minutes ago
Mike Retweeted Hillary Clinton
Mike added,
Hillary ClintonVerified account@HillaryClinton
I'm excited to sign up for @Verrit, a media platform for the 65.8 million! Will you join me and sign up too? https://verrit.com/sixty-five-point-eight-million…
2 replies2 retweets9 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 45m45 minutes ago
That was the tweet.
1 reply1 retweet8 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 44m44 minutes ago
This was the day and time she tweeted about it, to promote it
1 reply3 retweets10 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 43m43 minutes ago
Mike Retweeted Mike
Almost 40k followers within 24 hours
Mike added,
Mike@Fuctupmind
The power of twitter. 7:20 PM 9/3 Hillary tweeted about Verrit. It had 3441 followers.…
2 replies3 retweets9 likes
Mike@Fuctupmind 43m43 minutes ago
For what it's worth.
1 reply2 retweets7 likes
- 3 more replies
New conversation
Dr. Roy Schestowitz@schestowitz 48m48 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange
Julian, correct me if I'm wrong, but WIKILEAKS actually PROMOTED the Trump Tape. Do I remember correctly? Trashes HRC's little theory.
2 replies9 retweets24 likes
Julian Assange @JulianAssange 46m46 minutes ago
Julian Assange Retweeted WikiLeaks
Correct
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Mare Lombardo@bluewave088 44m44 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange
The WP is bullshit
1 reply0 retweets3 likes
Adorably Deplorable@AdorablyD 36m36 minutes ago
Soon it'll be called the Rose McGowan Post
0 replies0 retweets1 like
End of conversation
New conversation
LA @lanstead777 46m46 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange
Why all the sudden attacks against @wikileaks & Julian? Is it HRC & her book tour? For months, there's been nothing. What's going on?
2 replies1 retweet2 likes
LOCKUP_PEDOS@trumps_all 45m45 minutes ago
Cause he’s got the goods on them, and they trying to portray him as part of “Great Russian Collusion” story so their sheep won’t believe it
1 reply0 retweets1 like
LA @lanstead777 39m39 minutes ago
But he's always had the goods. Why now?
0 replies0 retweets0 likes
End of conversation
Paul Zickler@mrzickler 30m30 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange
Search for Trump Tape yields 14,097 results. Search for Comey Wikileaks yields 657 results. (Wikileaks Russia yields 2755 results)
0 replies0 retweets3 likes
mojave rattler@PennyHicks13 38m38 minutes ago
Replying to @JulianAssange @Faye0226
No surprise, lib media bias was exposed in ‘04 Exposed again in ‘06 as JournoLIST Exposed AGAIN in ‘12 colluding with DNC & Clinton campaign
I went through every major publication including Breitbart and . . . . . found nothing.
FAKE NEWS.
what are you talking about...
I gave you the link to the hill.com...
breitbart has a link on is first page on the right side... as I type this...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ry-clintons-corrupt-uranium-deal-with-russia/
here is the hill.com link...
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
I also gave you a link to national review.
I gave you the link to the hill.com...
breitbart has a link on is first page on the right side... as I type this...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ry-clintons-corrupt-uranium-deal-with-russia/
here is the hill.com link...
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...sian-bribery-plot-before-obama-administration
I also gave you a link to national review.