Fauci's cruel experiments on poor dogs

[wrbtrader]

Lab experiments has always been a controversy in our society especially when they involved pets like dogs or cats...animals that we most likely give a name that's meaningful to us or reminds us of an animal that grew up with our family.

Also, its controversy to do such types of cruel experiments on something we eat as a consumer (e.g. cow, chicken, pigs).

Thus, had the same been done to rats or mices...people tend to tolerate such type of experiments.

wrbtrader

 

[gwb-trading]

Yeah.... as expected the entire story is bullshiat.

‘Cruel’ puppy experiment was ‘mistakenly’ linked to US health agency
Agency responds to concerns from lawmakers and activists
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...auci-beagle-study-false-vaccine-b1945690.html

The nation’s top agency dealing with the spread of infectious disease has responded after a group of lawmakers pressed its director, Dr Anthony Fauci, for answers about supposed US-funded experiments involving vaccines tested on puppies.

In a lengthy emailed statement to The Independent on Monday, the agency clarified that the unsettling image of beagle puppies apparently sedated with their heads inserted into small enclosures containing disease-carrying sand flies was not supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

According to the agency the study and its associated images, such as the one above, “mistakenly cited support from NIAID” when they were published in July’s issue of PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, an online scientific journal.

“n fact NIAID did not support this specific research shown in the images of the beagles being circulated,” the agency’s statement continued.

(More at above url)

 

[Tsing Tao]

Yeah.... as expected the entire story is bullshiat.

‘Cruel’ puppy experiment was ‘mistakenly’ linked to US health agency
Agency responds to concerns from lawmakers and activists
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...auci-beagle-study-false-vaccine-b1945690.html

The nation’s top agency dealing with the spread of infectious disease has responded after a group of lawmakers pressed its director, Dr Anthony Fauci, for answers about supposed US-funded experiments involving vaccines tested on puppies.

In a lengthy emailed statement to The Independent on Monday, the agency clarified that the unsettling image of beagle puppies apparently sedated with their heads inserted into small enclosures containing disease-carrying sand flies was not supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

According to the agency the study and its associated images, such as the one above, “mistakenly cited support from NIAID” when they were published in July’s issue of PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, an online scientific journal.

“n fact NIAID did not support this specific research shown in the images of the beagles being circulated,” the agency’s statement continued.

(More at above url)

From your article:

“n fact NIAID did not support this specific research shown in the images of the beagles being circulated,” the agency’s statement continued.

The agency did go on to specify other instances of experiments on young dogs conducted with support from NIAID, which the agency described as part of efforts to develop a vaccine for leishmaniasis, a sometimes-deadly disease that can lead to disabling disfigurations among survivors; it is common in some developing nations throughout some tropical regions and southern Europe.
​

So "we didn't support that experiment, but we do similar ones here".

 

[gwb-trading]

From your article:

“n fact NIAID did not support this specific research shown in the images of the beagles being circulated,” the agency’s statement continued.

The agency did go on to specify other instances of experiments on young dogs conducted with support from NIAID, which the agency described as part of efforts to develop a vaccine for leishmaniasis, a sometimes-deadly disease that can lead to disabling disfigurations among survivors; it is common in some developing nations throughout some tropical regions and southern Europe.
​

So "we didn't support that experiment, but we do similar ones here".

And the article goes on to explain how the dogs were treated humanely in any experiments. Why don't you read the rest of it.

 

[Tsing Tao]

And the article goes on to explain how the dogs were treated humanely in any experiments. Why don't you read the rest of it.

All it said is their vocal cords were removed humanely. I read it.

But oh yeah, we gave dogs viruses that would disfigure them "humanely". I see.