Facebook protected you from "unsafe" Diamond and Silk

Why are they even suing? On what grounds? FB is a private enterprise and it can choose freely whom to let roam on their platform and whom not and which content it allows and which not.

Why didnt Zuckerman just say that then? Tell Congress that they are free enterprise and they choose to not take black women who support Trump. I am willing to watch that play out. Go for it.

cha-ching!
 
Based on? Other than pissing off Tony Stark as usual...


Zuckerberg didnt seem as happy as you are to see that little episode getting that much publicity- regardless of what the legal arguments are.

He will have to react "proactively" to make it go away. Or he can take your recommended route and just argue that he has a right to ban black women who disagree with him. For some reason, he did not think that argument was a winner.


cha-ching!!!!
 
You still don't seem to be able to provide a single argument why FB cannot moderate nor boot off users in whatever way it pleases.

Zuckerberg didnt seem as happy as you are to see that little episode getting that much publicity- regardless of what the legal arguments are.

He will have to react "proactively" to make it go away. Or he can take your recommended route and just argue that he has a right to ban black women who disagree with him. For some reason, he did not think that argument was a winner.


cha-ching!!!!
 
I hope Diamond and Silk run for Congress. Liven that dump up a bit.


I dunno. Maybe if they are elected Congress will refuse to seat them or give them security clearances. You know, when you are so dangerous that you are not even allowed to have a facebook or youtube account that has to be taken seriously.

:cool:
 
You still don't seem to be able to provide a single argument why FB cannot moderate nor boot off users in whatever way it pleases.

No. I said that Zuckerman should go ahead and make the argument that he can and I am willing to watch it play out. Guess he didnt want to go down that road the way you do. Of course you are not the one who has to write the checks when things go wrong.

You already have numerous class actions shaping up on the privacy issue, so go ahead and argue that its your company and we can ban black women who are not Silicon Valley lefties. Yeh. that's winner and will help to tamp down outrage against Facebook. Or not.

Maybe Zuckerberg wants to dig in on the legal issues to stand on principles and his right to exclude Diamond and Silk. Didn't sound that way when he said:


“Congressman,” Zuckerberg responded, “in that specific case, our team made an enforcement error and we have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it.”

cha-ching!!!! cha-ching!! cha-ching!!!!

meanwhile:
https://marketingland.com/facebook-confronts-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-70m-users-238092
 
Last edited:
No. I said that Zuckerman should go ahead and make the argument that he can and I am willing to watch it play out. Guess he didnt want to go down that road the way you do. Of course you are not the one who has to write the checks when things go wrong.

You already have numerous class actions shaping up on the privacy issue, so go ahead and argue that its your company and we can ban black women who are not Silicon Valley lefties. Yeh. that's winner and will help to tamp down outrage against Facebook. Or not.

Maybe Zuckerberg wants to dig in on the legal issues to stand on principles and his right to exclude Diamond and Silk. Didn't sound that way when he said:


“Congressman,” Zuckerberg responded, “in that specific case, our team made an enforcement error and we have already gotten in touch with them to reverse it.”

cha-ching!!!! cha-ching!! cha-ching!!!!

meanwhile:
https://marketingland.com/facebook-confronts-class-action-lawsuit-on-behalf-of-70m-users-238092

Every conservative leaning page on Facebook endures "enforcement errors".
 
Every conservative leaning page on Facebook endures "enforcement errors".


Maybe they can use that as a justification for discriminating against Diamond and Silk. ie. they did not single them out, they just exclude all conservative sites. sort of the Lois Lerner Defense.

:cool:
 
Back
Top