Facebook protected you from "unsafe" Diamond and Silk

Well, I'm not well enough versed in matters involving the courts to debate you on this, but I still think Diamond & Silk were wronged. They didn't do anything wrong. And FB is pretty much a utility (if you will) in the sense that it has gotten very very big. Who knows. I do like D&S... albeit I suspect they're in it for the $'s. :D
Diamond and Silk rings a bell.. I think they use to work a tandem @ the Ranch outside of Reno, NV back in the 90’s- dot com days...Roger Stone must have rediscovered them.
 
Diamond and Silk rings a bell.. I think they use to work a tandem @ the Ranch outside of Reno, NV back in the 90’s- dot com days...Roger Stone must have rediscovered them.
No... you're thinking of that truck-stop on the Nev/Cali line. Mesquite Charlies I think it was called. And it was Handle123 that discovered them.
 
No... you're thinking of that truck-stop on the Nev/Cali line. Mesquite Charlies I think it was called. And it was Handle123 that discovered them.
LOL...You could be right...maybe I’m thinking of Precious and Kitten.
 
I do perform my research before I post just as you seem to crawl into every user's ass and seem to turn over their previous posts 5 times before you launch your personal assaults. Care to let me get back on topic please?

Crawl into every user's ass? You're being a bit hyperbolic now, aren't you?
 
I let others be the judge of that. I just noticed that you seem to do a fair amount of user background digging when you disagree with someone's point and that you then engage in character assassination rather than staying on point. Admittedly, you often wait for someone to get personal before you unpack your bazooka. At least thats my takeaway after reading many of your posts. But on gun control I can't deny you have a valid point regarding the impossibility to disarm America. That train left the station a long time ago.

Crawl into every user's ass? You're being a bit hyperbolic now, aren't you?
 
I let others be the judge of that. I just noticed that you seem to do a fair amount of user background digging when you disagree with someone's point and that you then engage in character assassination rather than staying on point. Admittedly, you often wait for someone to get personal before you unpack your bazooka. At least thats my takeaway after reading many of your posts. But on gun control I can't deny you have a valid point regarding the impossibility to disarm America. That train left the station a long time ago.

The "background digging" you refer to is due to a regular occurrence of folks - mostly on the left of the political spectrum, but not always, disappearing or getting banned only to come back under a new username and pick a fight with their old "foes" as it were. Unfortunately, the ambushed user is on met on unfair ground because he or she has no idea who the new party is.

You fit that profile quite well. Someone who just started at a site called ELITE TRADER which is really for a trading community but instantly comes down to the politics section and starts in on some folks with "history" he/she claims to have. So it looked very suspect.

If that isn't the case, then I apologize. But I'm still not sure it isn't the case. It would be next to unheard of for someone in your situation to be legitimately a new member.
 
Back
Top