If the government sent anyone making less than 100K annually a 40,000 dollar check wont that stimulate the economy?
Quote from noob_trad3r:
If the government sent anyone making less than 100K annually a 40,000 dollar check wont that stimulate the economy?
Quote from trefoil:
The template for this is 1967-1982.
In late 1967, the UK was forced to devalue the pound. In 1968, the dollar de facto went off gold when the London Gold Pool was broken up.
The French cackled, and were promptly reminded that pride goes before a fall: they were forced to devalue in 1969.
The result of that devaluation was mild, and so gold settled back to its old 35 per ounce value, and everyone thought it was all over.
Then, the whole thing started up again in 1971. By August, Nixon de jure took the dollar off gold. The rest of the seventies followed.
The PIIGS Euro debacle is the analog to the French devaluation: Trichet, standing in for de Gaulle, is being forced to deal with the same forces that swept through the US in 2008.
As of now, it looks like the situation's been stabilized, and I'm sure everyone's breathing a sigh of relief.
In a few years, something will happen to start the whole thing up again. The irony is, when it's all over the dollar will still be the reserve currency.
Also, the problem this time will be deflation, not inflation, because the problem this time isn't that there's too much money sloshing around, but that what there is is disappearing rapidly into the black hole of deleveraging. Whether gold will do well I don't know, but my guess is that it will do well until the resolution, and then do poorly.
What will do better is first buying volatility over this time period, and then selling it into the resolution of the crisis. This isn't easy.
For 99% of the folks reading this, the best advice is to sit and wait it all out. The other 1%, who understand statistics, volatility, greed and fear, the difference between risk and uncertainty, and, most importantly, vanity (read Ecclesiastes, and look at Taleb: he understands all of this except vanity), will be able to profit.
If you don't understand ALL of these things, just stay out.
Quote from clacy:
Sure but remember that all you're doing is robbing from future productivity to stimulate the current economy.
If you seriously think that robbing from those that are productive (even if it is in the future) to give to those that are less productive is a good idea......![]()
Quote from Ed Breen:
So, you think that if the Gov't goes to the credit markets to finance giving every american who earns under $100,000 a $40,000 'gift' that it will 'stimulute' the economy...making money by spending money (we loose on every dollar but we make it up in volume). So, how many people are we talking about...what is the legal population...300 Million plus? Do you mean to include kids ( I got a laugh when my minor daughter who had a part time summer job got an Obamacrat stimulus check last year...although I was disqualified). Lets say you only mean to include legal adults...but if spending makes money why make a limit; can't we be Krugmanesque? But lets just say we are taling about 100 Million $40,000 checks...., so we are talking 4 Trillion...did I get the zero's right...Krugman would be proud of you!
So, we spend 4 Trillion in gifts to make money! Now, its the govenment that is doing this and it is doing it by selling 4 Trillion in TBills. So, unless you assume that the government will default and not pay this debt back or unless you assume that the debt itself will precipitate gov't insolvency and hyperinfationary currency collapse (very likely); then you must beleive the government will pay the money back and pay the debt service until it does.
What will the growth rate be from this spending...what will the tax rate be if you really expect to pay this back and service the debt? Do you see how stupid this proposal is...if you do...then why did you expect the Obamacrat stimulus of 2009-10 to be any different.
Quote from dhpar:
this is one of the reasons why i doubt the deflation is a threat. chinese simply do not want to work for free for american leeches anymore...
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3pcfGPJU6a0&pos=5