d08, I did not expect you to be on the wrong side of this argument. You guys are being way too ham-fisted, intentionally or otherwise.
You probably haven't seen some of his posts.
d08, I did not expect you to be on the wrong side of this argument. You guys are being way too ham-fisted, intentionally or otherwise.
Oh, and while completely irrelevant to this conversation, you might want to look up on how the Postal Service is not subject to local traffic laws. Just sayin',
This should only apply when the request is legal. Police trying to use intimidation and authority against a citizen should be heavily frowned upon. I've been talking to a lawyer about this and her advice is to not volunteer anything. In my personal experience, volunteering information and trying to be co-operative has ended badly for me previously. Would have worked in my favor to just be quiet. Say as little as possible, consult a lawyer, that's my motto...
Do you even read your knee jerk responses? You say no one is using a broad brush and in the same sentence pull out your broad brush claiming all of us get together and complain. You completely ignore where I wrote that once is too much. Totally ignore where I say blacks have a legit complaint. Act as if "all of us" support police brutality. Your post is a perfect example of everything that is wrong with this situation. Only interested in driving your own point while not giving any real time to any idea other than your own. IOW, on this issue you're full of shit.
Not only that, police do not have unilaerla rights to request information or action from you without any specific cause or intention. Sorry but the police are not gestapo walking the streets able to stop anyone (remember stop and frisk) or demand papers or even escalate a minor infraction (there is no benefit to the job wasting resources going after minor infractions while ignoring bigger crimes).
So they do NOT always get the benefit of the doubt because the criminal system is set up that way. Cops do not get to force you to do something and them immediately claim resisting arrest when you say no. sorry it does not work that way. Since when did cops get this absolute grant of power above the Constitution?
Let me see your license!
Why?
Resisting! I am arresting you!
Citizens stop handing over papers on demand after WWII.
I think what you are arguing is Probable Cause. Police need to have this to stop or detain you. In the case of the Amazon guy, probable cause is him parking on the wrong side of the wrong. That allows him to ask for a driver's license.
Still, even if the officer didn't have probable cause to request ID, you're really rolling the dice if you choose that moment to disobey and make a stand. I'd advise against it. Most cops will follow the law, some won't.
I believe what he is also saying, (and if I'm wrong, it's what I'm saying) is that whether or not probable cause is present, the police still have the option, legally or not, to engage or not engage.
The premise is that: if police decide to engage Blacks to a greater degree than Whites, then the arrest/conviction/killing statistics will be skewed against Blacks.
Folks like @d08 , though intelligent-seeming in many other areas, can't seem to wrap his brain around this concept.