Ex-Hawaii official denounces 'ludicrous' birther claims.

[stu]

Quote from jem:

Stu you also confuse the difference between faith and fact.

You exhibit faith in Obama being a Natural Born Citizen.
I will not argue with your faith.

If you wish to state that as fact...
If l will point out why you are ignorant.

Don't kid yourself Jem, from the things you write it's doubtful you could point out your own ass.

You're a theist, blindly submissively witlessly accepting extortionate claims of faith having no basis in reality, which is all that is needed to be a theist.
You're a birther, rejecting the requisite legal evidence confirming eligibility in reality, as defined and required under law, which is all that is needed to be a birther.

The sheer irony naturally escapes you.

 

[stu]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:
So you are just an innocent victim merely defending yourself.

What is the most pathetic, is that you might actually believe such tripe...

In any case, I gave multiple examples of how a person can have both faith and doubt at the same time, to varying degrees...and you had no comeback...

I'll ask one question:

Does God exist?

Innocent victim, what the hell are you talking about, and no, why should I believe such tripe.

No comeback...? obviously then, a reasoned response is not something you consider as a comeback.

In reciprocation I'll give one answer to your one question :

There is no sensible reason to believe it does.

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I would prefer those who can't actually make arguments keep their nose out of this.

I believe that strong arguments can be made to show the weakness of the atheistic position.

So if you have a strong argument, by all means.

If you just want to troll, please...there are plenty of other threads.

Well now that's some example of a theist's vanity. A peremptory haughty attitude which will troll like a crazy, only to turn on their own kind for doing the same.
However, it's not going to be much of an argument that tries to show weakness in not agreeing with what are in the first place, a theist's utterly illogical and absurd assertions.

Anytime you really do "..want to seriously, honestly, and openly discuss the issues".... let me know.

 

[stu]

Quote from Savant:

Wow, talk about pot calling kettle black! You're accusing that guy of ignoring one side of the argument while it's the signature of the other one. You are being rather partial in your observation too sir.

I think you are mistaking my placing of an argument, as your post above appears so to do, with those who just childishly make snarky remarks against it alone.
Strange you should think my responding to illogical and faulty assertions is being partial and ignoring one side of the argument.

But if that were the case , your argument above would be guilty of its own accusation.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

"There is no sensible reason to believe it does."

So all your reasons to believe are sensible?

What's that you say Mr. Spock?

Quote from stu:

Innocent victim, what the hell are you talking about, and no, why should I believe such tripe.

No comeback...? obviously then, a reasoned response is not something you consider as a comeback.

In reciprocation I'll give one answer to your one question :

There is no sensible reason to believe it does.


Well now that's some example of a theist's vanity. A peremptory haughty attitude which will troll like a crazy, only to turn on their own kind for doing the same.
However, it's not going to be much of an argument that tries to show weakness in not agreeing with what are in the first place, a theist's utterly illogical and absurd assertions.

Anytime you really do "..want to seriously, honestly, and openly discuss the issues".... let me know.

 

[377OHMS]

Quote from Mercor:

lol