Ex-Hawaii official denounces 'ludicrous' birther claims.

[OPTIONAL777]

Holding no faith, what a riot.

Like someone holding darkness...

How bloody silly...

Stick with the turnip defense, it makes more sense than your denying your own faith.

Quote from stu:

It makes no difference what label you want to apply to holding no faith, whether it's agnostic or atheist or whatever , holding no faith does not require holding faith for another thing.
People who do not have faith in God do not have to have faith in what you call no God. Your assertion that they do is just absurd.
A recognition of the ridiculous is not about requiring faith, of any kind.


You have no argument so you start to personalize. First sign you've lost your way.


The concept is unreasonable, un-rationalized, un-explained, un-explainable according to you, so there is really nothing worth calling a concept at all.


Clearly though, you have understood the concept of Gilbert.

 

[stu]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Holding no faith, what a riot.

Like someone holding darkness...

How bloody silly...

Stick with the turnip defense, it makes more sense than your denying your own faith.

Yea well you are bloody silly.
I can't help the skewed and limited simplistic turnip thinking religion has evidently lumbered you with.
That's your problem.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Yea, well you are bloody silly +1.

I can't help the dishonest and denial driven minded atheists...
atheism has evidently lumbered up the side of your brain.
That's your problem.

Quote from stu:

Yea well you are bloody silly.
I can't help the skewed and limited simplistic turnip thinking religion has evidently lumbered you with.
That's your problem.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

so according to stu the guy who creates the first ad hom and changes the subject to God and faith doesn't morph the thread --- why? Oh I know its because he and stu are atheists.

stu always deceitful, sometimes entertaining.

The thread wasn't morphed into to God and faith, but merely used the whole subject of religion in one straightforward comparison.

Then you of course had to go ballistic and jump in with both feet going totally off topic spouting about your faith and Jesus.

You could have just explained why you need no proof at all for totally ridiculous religious claims, yet demand absolute proof for a Presidents birth even though there are legal documents for that anyway.

But of course like all religious protagonists, you can never be wrong about these things.

 

[stu]

Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Yea, well you are bloody silly +1.

I can't help the dishonest and denial driven minded atheists...
atheism has evidently lumbered up the side of your brain.
That's your problem.

No substance so you get all ad hom and personal.
Par for the course

 

[jem]

Quote from stu:

The thread wasn't morphed into to God and faith, but merely used the whole subject of religion in one straightforward comparison.

Then you of course had to go ballistic and jump in with both feet going totally off topic spouting about your faith and Jesus.

You could have just explained why you need no proof at all for totally ridiculous religious claims, yet demand absolute proof for a Presidents birth even though there are legal documents for that anyway.

But of course like all religious protagonists, you can never be wrong about these things.

you are a zealout.

I was giving examples of the difference between faith and fact. that is not proselytizing and a completely called for response... once your atheist buddy took the thread off target. the ad hom morphing came from an atheist, not me, making you the liar.

Note... the fanciful atheist demands proof the metaphysical... to admit there might be a God.

But thinks a digital copy found on the internet... counts as proof of natural born citizenship...

even though the president has not said it is his and its accurate
it is not the best document
it is not an original (which could be had from the source)
and the U.S. supreme court has not stated the definition of natural born citizen.
stu you have compromised your intellect to such a degree you are no longer worthy of response.

 

[OPTIONAL777]

Just returning your serve.

Anytime you want to seriously, honestly, and openly discuss the issues, well that would be a first time for you...but I am open to reasonable discussion.

If all you want to do is sling, right back at you...

Quote from stu:

No substance so you get all ad hom and personal.
Par for the course

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

...You have no real point to make but rather just blindly fall in with someone on a god slant, regardless of bothering with the unfounded accusations they make.

Huh? You presume too much.

Preferring to make silly drive by remarks

Like these?

Quote from stu:
Yea well you are bloody silly.
I can't help the skewed and limited simplistic turnip thinking religion has evidently lumbered you with.
That's your problem.

Quote from stu:
ah wrong labeling then , like what OptTrolzz does a lot of.... right so how about ... groupies.

Quote from stu:
Now it's starting to get ...what's the word...ah yes...klannish. You three defenders of a faith should get a room.

Quote from stu:
....in short then, the religious.

 

[Savant]

I don't know nearly all there is to know about this whole 'birther' issue. What I do know is that there would be one very simple and decisive way to settle it: produce the birth certificate. If he thinks it wont come up during the election, he's hitting the pipe (again).

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nwgD-8Bj_Qs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[stu]

Quote from Lucrum:

Huh? You presume too much.

Like these?

What's your point?
Parsing out my responses to OptionalZZzzz revilements against me, is nothing different from the sniping I'm saying is all you're indulging in anyway.