I'm doing it for recreation. And I will quit when I am tired of this nonsense.
Last edited:
Evolution Just Got Harder to Defend
- Thread starter FortuneTeller
- Start date
This thread is just more proof that right wingers are nitwits.
Exactly right... you have faith that rather than have to conclude that life emerged by impossible luck, science will discover that the emergence of life was inevitable.
I thought you were not a believer? Many believers have the same faith.
2. Let me explain the fine tuning given you limited prior analogy.
Our universe is so finely tuned its like the same 52 deck cards dealt out in the same order trillions and trillions times in a row.
At some point only a moron still things it was luck.
You have a choice, either faith in the universe or a Creator.
By the way if you still think this bullshit after watching these 2 videos from some of the smartest men on the planet .. you are hopeless.
I thought you were not a believer? Many believers have the same faith.
2. Let me explain the fine tuning given you limited prior analogy.
Our universe is so finely tuned its like the same 52 deck cards dealt out in the same order trillions and trillions times in a row.
At some point only a moron still things it was luck.
You have a choice, either faith in the universe or a Creator.
By the way if you still think this bullshit after watching these 2 videos from some of the smartest men on the planet .. you are hopeless.
I know exactly what you are speaking of. And those "materials' you speak of can't 'combine' 'randomly'. Change "combine" to "collide" and OK. But any "combination" won't be random, only the encounters.
This "fined tuned" excrement is utter bullshit. Every physical constant is "fine tuned."
For your edification, I will quote from your own reference, as the statement below is precisely in line with my own thinking, the thinking of the vast majority of scientists today, and is undoubtedly correct thinking.
"The common view is that given a fuller understanding of the physical and
biological conditions and processes involved, the emergence of life should
be seen to be quite likely, or at least not very surprising. The view which is
almost universally rejected by researchers in the field is that the numerous
and prima facie improbable physical and biological requirements for life all
fell together just by a fluke, like so many dice tumbling out of a bag and
landing all sixes."
Life didnt come from nothing. That is ludicrous. The fact of the matter is, nobody knows where life came from, the creationists dont know, the evolutionists do know, Hussein Obama doesn't know. Nobody knows.
Plead ignorance. Accept the fact that there are many things that cannot be explained.
Haven't been here in a while, decided to visit P&R. Nope nope nope...
Yes indeed they kinda know where life came from. Guess what, God is not needed. Nor is pleading ignorance for right wingers, they are plenty ignorant already.
Ha Ha Ha. Both of these guys are toying with you, especially Susskind. (By that I mean, obviously, people like you, not you personally. Neither Susskind nor Penrose are saying nor believing what you think they are saying and believing. I am sure they are enjoying, with a twinkle in their eyes, notoriety among the "intelligent designer" lunatics. All of the really creative physicists I have personally known over the years were pranksters, as though they had never completely grown up . I assume it's a necessary trait of the exceptionally creative mind.)
Last edited:
The religious idiots still haven't proved that their God exists.
Publishing something doesn't mean the authors necessarily believe it to be true nor does the subject matter have to be true. Publishing is required to remain in academia.
Publishing something doesn't mean the authors necessarily believe it to be true nor does the subject matter have to be true. Publishing is required to remain in academia.