"Subject to interpretation?" Are you kidding me? Have you even read a single book about evolution? Or do you just go by the feeder lines produced by creationists?Quote from Lucrum:
Do you ever let your unproven theories stand on their own merit or do you always compare them to religion as if it's either or?
YES! there is corroborating "evidence" (subject to interpretation) but that doesn't change the fact that it's still unproven or make some of those theories any less fantastical. Unless of course you're unaccustomed to thinking for yourself.
Quote from Lucrum:
Prejudice against what? Fantastical unproven theories? Then yes it probably is.
Quote from Lucrum:
Do you ever let your unproven theories stand on their own merit or do you always compare them to religion as if it's either or?
Quote from Gabfly1:
"Subject to interpretation?" Are you kidding me? Have you even read a single book about evolution? Or do you just go by the feeder lines produced by creationists?
There are no "competing theories" to evolution other than what is presented by holy book thumpers of one stripe or another. None. Not a single one. It is evolution, as understood by scientists with no other agenda than seeking the truth, against creationists with an predetermined end in mind. The dispute is very much a dichotomy, and you would do well to at least understand that much. Yes, it is either/or.
On the plus side, I think you've just made friends with some imams in the Middle East. You have so much to talk about with one another.
So far most of the "ridiculous remarks about science theory" have come from you and Gabby.Quote from stu:
ah right, , so you make ridiculous remarks about science theory
You keep grossly exaggerating my view, I'm starting to think it's the only "argument" you have. I don't question gravity or radioactivity and never said I did.because youâre prejudiced against those fantastical unproven theories like gravity, radioactivity, evolution.
More exaggeration on you part. I'm NOT arguing for a creator. Just questioning some of the "science" you guys so willing embrace despite being unproven just because it fits in with your prejudice against a creator.That helps your prejudice for an imaginary creator... how exactly.



Quote from STUpid:
You're still lashing out. Is it a form of therapy maybe?
Name calling and false claims don't make your wrongs right you know.