Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[Trader666]

You obviously haven't. You just parrot things you've read but clearly don't understand.

Quote from Gayfly:

I see that you have not yet muddled your way out of false equivalency

 

[Trader666]

This from the science illiterate who has no clue about what science illuminates versus what it does not.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

Quote from STUpid:

 

[stu]

Quote from Trader666:

This from the science illiterate who has no clue about what science illuminates versus what it does not.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

Clearly you are still very angry and upset about my response to some clumsy remarks you made quite a while ago.
Attacking me, childish name calling, and lashing out at science won't pretend magic your mistakes away.

 

[Trader666]

Oh please. I caught you red handed in that post and anyone who reads it will see that not only are you a science illiterate, you're a liar for trying to lie your way out of it now.

Quote from STUpid:

Clearly you are still very angry and upset about some ridiculous remarks you made quite a while ago.
Attacking me, childish name calling, and lashing out at science won't pretend magic your mistakes away.

 

[Trader666]

Your first lie (which I captured in my last reply) didn't sound plausible enough so you changed it to another? You're a total joke!

Quote from STUpid:

Clearly you are still very angry and upset about my response to some clumsy remarks you made quite a while ago.
Attacking me, childish name calling, and lashing out at science won't pretend magic your mistakes away.

 

[stu]

You're still getting nowhere lashing out with the same nonsense.

What's your point? You make some incorrect non scientific remarks, then shout "science is wrong" , stay angry about it for months ..... for what?
Is it to make religion correct to you in some weird way?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

Oh ok, then all those drive by strawmen red herring pre-conclusions you call questions, is just your prejudice showing through.

Prejudice against what? Fantastical unproven theories? Then yes it probably is.

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from Lucrum:

Prejudice against what? Fantastical unproven theories? Then yes it probably is.

Except that the "fantastical theories" regarding evolution have all manner of corroborating evidence, back and forth, regarding dating and speciation, which is added to almost daily across the globe, whereas the principal alternative is a "theory" favored by tribesmen from the Bronze Age and involves a sky father.

 

[Trader666]

Keep digging. You've been totally discredited and your continued lies and obfuscations only make you look STUpider and STUpider

Quote from STUpid:

You're still getting nowhere lashing out with the same nonsense.

What's your point? You make some incorrect non scientific remarks, then shout "science is wrong" , stay angry about it for months ..... for what?
Is it to make religion correct to you in some weird way?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

Except that the "fantastical theories" regarding evolution have all manner of corroborating evidence, back and forth, regarding dating and speciation, which is added to almost daily across the globe, whereas the principal alternative is a "theory" favored by tribesmen from the Bronze Age and involves a sky father.

Do you ever let your unproven theories stand on their own merit or do you always compare them to religion as if it's either or?

YES! there is corroborating "evidence" (subject to interpretation) but that doesn't change the fact that it's still unproven or make some of those theories any less fantastical. Unless of course you're unaccustomed to thinking for yourself.