Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.
- Thread starter peilthetraveler
- Start date
You didn't debunk evolution. You just showed a complete lack of understanding with it. Who says anything has to be planned? You? What makes you so sure? Do you just feel it? You just know, right? And we're all supposed to take you at your word. Any rational, logical, person who appreciates science, would reject this hypothesis outright.
If you want to learn how randomness can create non-randomness, take a look at Chaos Theory please. Nothing needs to be planned. In fact, nothing is planned.
For example, the sand dunes of the sahara desert look so beautiful, they must have been planned by the old man upstairs, right!? Wrong. The billions and billions of sand grains randomly and unpurposefully self-organizee themselves into what you see as a beautiful sand dune. That is chaos theory in action.
You might find the below thing enlightening, as I hope they are. I tell everyone, "If you want to know how the universe works, open up a physics textbook, not the bible." These explanations are far more elegant and rational than "God did it," which is an argument that explains absolutely nothing and as such has no place in our modern civilization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_sexual_reproduction
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1w0FiwfyUMM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory
<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/JnlkKdDXk-I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
if one is interested in how sex may have evolved in very simple organisms read about F-factor in E.coli. the dirty bacteria likes to engage in sex under certain conditions. the setup is simple enough so that one can imagine how it could possibly have evolved from a single gene with a few more genes added to the process later via simple steps.
Lol!
All your silly insults and pathetic remarks and you're still angry after months and months for not fathoming the blindingly obvious.
So that's why you're confused. It's with unfalsifiable and implausible , because you couldn't discriminate two sentences from each other.
Of course a Celestial God is just as much of an unfalsifiable claim as is a Celestial Teapot. They both are capable of being tested , verified by experiment or observation in reality as the other is.
In other words â¦they arenât.
You must prefer English at 3rd grade level.
Honestly , you can't grasp even that and you think you've half an idea about 96% of the universe.
Don't make me laugh..
Those are exactly the same arguments other similar deniers to yourself use to try and bring some sort of perverse justification to their own personal beliefs.
Scientific theories are not only theories as you've said they are.
Science simply does not embrace theories without question as you say it does.
An unproven scientific theory still contains proofs and facts despite what you think.
You're not questioning at all, just making silly remarks and carrying on with a willful misunderstanding of what science is.
Just like other ET creationists.
Funny... I was thinking the same of you and Gabby
I sure wish they'd call them something else then.
I guess you have a different perception of "without question" than I do
No argument from me here, which implies you're mistaken about what I think.
Oh but I am, and with an open mind to boot. I'm just not willing to swallow any old theory, especially if it's hard to swallow to begin with
Your cup of arrogance Runneth Over.
Actually I consider myself more in the middle as in unconvinced/undecided but it's certainly your prerogative to continue with stuPID assumptions and assertions if you like.