Evolution debunked in 1 paragraph.

[Gabfly1]

Quote from stu:

As long as you imagine gratuitous insult is all that’s needed for your argument, you’ll remain just as wrong as you ever were.

Speaking of Trader666, do you think that's who Eight had in mind earlier when he wrote this about the guy who would habitually and derogatorily first change your user name in a quote he's about to insult:

Quote from Eight:

...Personal attacks are the normal thing for politically oriented degaters and those are considered an admission of defeat in Philosophical circles...

 

[Trader666]

Really? How could you have written something as STUpid as the following? Is your need to believe there is no God so desperate that it clouds your thinking, or are you so uneducated and STUpid that you actually "thought" this was sound logic?

So which is more plausible. The existence of a Teapot or the existence of a God?
A Celestial Teapot or a Celestial God? Of course both are equally implausible.
Simply because a Celestial God is just as much of an unfalsifiable claim as is a Celestial Teapot.

Quote from STUpid:

As long as you imagine gratuitous insult is all that’s needed for your argument, you’ll remain just as wrong as you ever were.

 

[Trader666]

You conveniently left out the part where he was talking specifically about you:

Posters like Gabfly are on a political level... Personal attacks are the normal thing for politically oriented degaters and those are considered an admission of defeat in Philosophical circles...

Quote from Gayfly:

Speaking of Trader666, do you think that's who Eight had in mind earlier...

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from Trader666:

You conveniently left out the part...

No, I was merely referring to applicability. And, sure enough, there you are.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

In your defense you've made it clear that like a creationist or a flat earther, you come to a point where it is found necessary to be anti-science, which seems to strangely validate some other personal conclusions.

Oh I'm not anti-science, I'm anti-stuPID. And some of the unproven so called "scientific" theories require one hell of a lot of faith to embrace without question. I'm merely questioning them, not necesarily dismissing them. I'm a little more open minded than that.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from Gabfly1:

You mean your real-time, first-hand experience with evolution?

I'd like to meet and talk with anyone who has real-time, first-hand experience with macro evolution. Care to direct me to them?

 

[Trader666]

Sure Gayfly, whatever makes you happy

Quote from Gayfly:

No, I was merely referring to applicability.

Quote from Gayfly:

Speaking of Trader666, do you think that's who Eight had in mind when he wrote this...

Quote from Eight:

Posters like Gabfly are on a political level... Personal attacks are the normal thing for politically oriented degaters and those are considered an admission of defeat in Philosophical circles...

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from Lucrum:

I'd like to meet and talk with anyone who has real-time, first-hand experience with macro evolution. Care to direct me to them?

Judging by your earlier post that I quoted, I thought that was you.

Enjoy the breeze. (See below.)

 

[Gabfly1]

Quote from Trader666:

Sure Gayfly, whatever makes you happy

How refreshing that breeze must feel, every time something flies right over your head. And the permanent windswept look suits you so well.

 

[Trader666]

It it comforts you to pretend that when one of your trolling attempts blows up in your face, go right ahead

Quote from Gayfly:

How refreshing that breeze must feel, every time something flies over your head. And the permanent windswept look suits you so well.