Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

Not even one.

Jem cannot find even one climate scientist that comes straight out and denies that which every science organization and climate scientist in the world says.


That's pretty amazing.

 

[jem]

you are the one who claims there is science showing man made co2 causes warming. Yet, you have produced no peer reviewed papers or even 10 scientists who state man made co2 causes warming.

scientists


1. The co founder of green peace Patrick Moore says no scientific proof co2 causes warming. (which is what I say.) I am not going to say it does not because its possible pizza causes global warming too. But I am not going to ban pizza without science. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ng-says-Greenpeace-founder-Patrick-Moore.html

2. here is another scientist who says co2 is good for food production and does not cause warming...

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2009/10/07/scientist-carbon-
dioxide-doesnt-cause-global-warming

3.
Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections
These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the next century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.

• David Bellamy, botanist.[16][17][18][19]
• Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[20][21]
• Piers Corbyn, owner of the business WeatherAction which makes weather forecasts.[22][23]
• Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[24][25][26][27]
• Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.[28][29]
• Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[30][31]
• Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.[32][33][34][35]
• Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]
• Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.[43][44][45]
• Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).[46][47]
• Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.[48][49]
• Tom Quirk, corporate director of biotech companies and former board member of the Institute of Public Affairs, an Australian conservative think-tank.[50]
• Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.[51][52][53][54]
• Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S. Senator.[55]
• Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.[56][57]
• Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.[58][59]
• Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.[60][61]
• Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.[62][63]
• Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.[64][65]
• Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).[66]

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes


These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

• Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[68][69]
• Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[70][71][72]
• Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg[73][74][75]
• Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[76][77]
• Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[78][79]
• David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[80][81]
• Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[82][83]
• William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University[84][85]
• Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[86][87]
• Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[88][89]
• William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[90][91]
• David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[92][93]
• Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri[94][95]
• Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[96][97]
• Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[98][99]
• Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[100][101]
• Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[102][103]
• Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado[104][105]
• Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[106][107][108]
• Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo[109][110]
• Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem[111][112]
• Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[113][114][115][116]
• Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[117][118]
• Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[119][120]
• Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center[121][122]
• George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[123][124]
• Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[125][126]

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

• Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[127][128]
• Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[129][130]
• Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[131][132]
• Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[133][134]
• John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[135][136][137]
• Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[138][139]
• David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[140][141]
• Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[142][143]
• Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[144][145]
• Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[146][147]

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

• Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior[148][149][150]
• Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change [151][152]
• Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University[153][154]
• Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia[155][156]

Deceased scientists
This section includes deceased scientists who would otherwise be listed in the prior sections.

• August H. "Augie" Auer Jr. (1940–2007), retired New Zealand MetService meteorologist and past professor of atmospheric science at the University of Wyoming[157]
• Reid Bryson (1920–2008), emeritus professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison.[158]
• Robert M. Carter (1942–2016), former head of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University[159][160]
• William M. Gray (1929–2016), professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University[161][162]
• Robert Jastrow (1925–2008), American astronomer, physicist, cosmologist and leading NASA scientist who, together with Fred Seitz and William Nierenberg, established the George C. Marshall Institute[163][164][165]
• Harold ("Hal") Warren Lewis (1923–2011), emeritus professor of physics and former department chairman at the University of California, Santa Barbara.[166]
• Frederick Seitz (1911–2008), solid-state physicist, former president of the National Academy of Sciences and co-founder of the George C. Marshall Institute in 1984.[158][167]

See also

Not even one.

Jem cannot find even one climate scientist that comes straight out and denies that which every science organization and climate scientist in the world says.


That's pretty amazing.

 

[futurecurrents]

Not even one publishing climate scientist.

 

[gwb-trading]

Not even one publishing climate scientist.

Because futurecurrents is the sole arbitrator of deciding who should be considered a publishing climate scientist.

Note that not a single one of the people futurecurrents promotes has a degree in climate science. In fact most of the people he quotes don't even have degrees in science. His favorite climate change alarmist is a cartoonist.

 

[jem]

plus he is wrong since humlum is a published climate scientist and his paper explains man made co2 does not even track with co2 in the atmosphere.

 

[futurecurrents]

As for Humdrum et al. Basically, they are jokes.

We have been very critical of the correspondence of Bye, Humlum, Stordahl. Some might even say harsh. But we must acknowledge that their contributions are very interesting. In fact, their letters provide with a perfect example of the strategies deployed by climate "skeptics" to twist the debate and sow doubt in the minds of the public. BHS articulate their argumentation around the defense of an ideal of scientific method they believe in while clearly violating the rules they pretend to respect. Citing irrelevant quotes or taken out of their context, misunderstanding fundamental concepts, concentrating on precise points without looking at the broad picture, cherry-picking or even inventing scientific facts and data in order to provide with justifications to their hypotheses, etc.

So we would like to thank them from the heart, because they have chosen to be good examples of how science should not be done, how climate science can be at worst when left to the sole hands of so-called climate "skeptics".

http://www.skepticalscience.com/humlum-at-it-again.html

 

[futurecurrents]

Jem's list of "deniers"

first one, A BOTANIST !!!! LOL

And Judith Curry !!!! She doesn't deny man made global warming.

 

[jem]

your website is sponsored by al gore and run by a cartoonist. and you can tell by the garbage that substitutes for thought and science.

Humlum is a real scientists, his paper is peer reviewed and other papers ahve made the same conclusion. its a fact that co2 trails changes in ocean warming and cooling....

but from your cartoonists website... from your article...

your guy has a problem with humlum... because humlum properly states the IPCC does not crate a scientifically derived probability for global warming.

"Their argument is articulated as follows: firstly, they dismiss categorically that a methodology exists which would allow for attributing the current observed global warming to human activities with a confidence of at least 90%. BHS pretend that the IPCC assigns confidence levels to scientific positions based on the outcome of a simple vote. They suggest that the more votes a statement (e.g., “global warming is mostly due to human activities”) receives, the higher confidence the IPCC assigns to it. As discussed below, this is by no means how the IPCC determinesconfidence levels. BHS are criticizing the IPCC for something it does not actually do."


Then your guy writes the IPCC actually gets is probability this way.. it elicits experts views.

"The method followed to derive these probabilities that define likelihood “may be based on quantitative analysis or an elicitation of expert views” [2]. In addition, whatever the outcome of the estimation process, sources of uncertainty must be mentioned and discussed"

--


What a joke you, your website and the IPCC is.

As for Humdrum et al. Basically, they are jokes.

We have been very critical of the correspondence of Bye, Humlum, Stordahl. Some might even say harsh. But we must acknowledge that their contributions are very interesting. In fact, their letters provide with a perfect example of the strategies deployed by climate "skeptics" to twist the debate and sow doubt in the minds of the public. BHS articulate their argumentation around the defense of an ideal of scientific method they believe in while clearly violating the rules they pretend to respect. Citing irrelevant quotes or taken out of their context, misunderstanding fundamental concepts, concentrating on precise points without looking at the broad picture, cherry-picking or even inventing scientific facts and data in order to provide with justifications to their hypotheses, etc.

So we would like to thank them from the heart, because they have chosen to be good examples of how science should not be done, how climate science can be at worst when left to the sole hands of so-called climate "skeptics".

http://www.skepticalscience.com/humlum-at-it-again.html

 

[jem]

In short you sell a gas 2000 times more powerful than co2 for a living and you have never produced any science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

And on top of that you lie... because every single expert in the world admits co2 levels trail ocean temps in the historical data base. there have been papers by nutters trying to explain that fact but they don't deny it.

Stop lying your ass off about science.

 

[futurecurrents]

In short you sell a gas 2000 times more powerful than co2 for a living and you have never produced any science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

And on top of that you lie... because every single expert in the world admits co2 levels trail ocean temps in the historical data base. there have been papers by nutters trying to explain that fact but they don't deny it.

Stop lying your ass off about science.

Oh shut up, you crazed asshole. Just shut the fuck up.