Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

jem said:
I guess that is why you can continue to be a troll.

What more could any want. a peer reviewed paper shows you in your teams data that co2 has a high correlation with the change in ocean temps and then shows you that lags by 9 months. (and this has been shown in previous peer reviewed papers as well. )


you see a peer reviewed paper showing the data shows co2 levels trail warming and cooling and that does not make a dent in your bullshit.

You demand scientists to prove a negative in a peer reviewed paper. What a troll you are.

you are just being a child because you actually zero peer reviewed papers showing man made co2 causes warming... which are not failed models.
More...



You keep trying to change the subject, which is that there are NO respected climate scientists that deny man made global warming.

If there were they would be easy for even you to find.

Compare that to this list of virtually every science organization in the world saying that manmade global warming is true.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/


Jem. Just stop. It's getting trollish of you now and embarrassing.
 
futurecurrents said:
You keep trying to change the subject, which is that there are NO respected climate scientists that deny man made global warming.

If there were they would be easy for even you to find.

Compare that to this list of virtually every science organization in the world saying that manmade global warming is true.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/


Jem. Just stop. It's getting trollish of you now and embarrassing.
More...

Amusing that Jem and others provide peer reviewed paper after paper and scientist after scientist including the highly-respected heads of university climate departments .... and the best you can do is put your hands over your ears and scream "I can't hear you" like a petulant three year old.
 
futurecurrents said:
You keep trying to change the subject, which is that there are NO respected climate scientists that deny man made global warming.

If there were they would be easy for even you to find.

Compare that to this list of virtually every science organization in the world saying that manmade global warming is true.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/


Jem. Just stop. It's getting trollish of you now and embarrassing.
More...
You are such and idiot. That is not an argument when in your alternative universe you and the cartoonist are the ones determining which scientist are subjectively "respected".

We have posted countless peer reviewed papers of respected scientist. You always have some completely bullshit made up excuse as to why that scientist is not respected.

Everything is cherry picked in the global warming scam.

It is clear that your definition of a "respected" climate scientist is that they fulling and unequivocally believe in the climate religion. If a scientist does not, you consider that scientist to be NOT respected.
 
Last edited:
WeToddDid2 said:
You are such and idiot. That is not an argument when in your alternative universe you and the cartoonist are the ones determining which scientist are subjectively "respected".

We have posted countless peer reviewed papers of respected scientist. You always have some completely bullshit made up excuse as to why that scientist is not respected.

Everything is cherry picked in the global warming scam.

It is clear that your definition of a "respected" climate scientist is that they fulling and unequivocally believe in the climate religion. If a scientist does not, you consider that scientist to be NOT respected.
More...


There are NO publishing climate scientists that deny man made global warming and none have been presented.

How does it feel when every expert on earth believes something and you don't? Don't you feel stupid?

Oh wait, you're a Trumper. You're used to it. lol
 
futurecurrents said:
There are NO publishing climate scientists that deny man made global warming and none have been presented.

How does it feel when every expert on earth believes something and you don't? Don't you feel stupid?

Oh wait, you're a Trumper. You're used to it. lol
More...

Well except for Dr. Judith Curry and the long list of others who state the contribution of man to global warming is negligible and not a threat to the planet.
 
do you not read... fraudcurrents.

If man made co2 has little influence on atmospheric co2... that destroys the idea that man made co2 is causing warming.


► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.




jem said:
When Humlum and his team publish a paper which shows using data that everyone in the field uses which shows that co2 levels follow changes in ocean temp levels ....


how can you keep lying your fricken ass off.

this is peer reviewed science...


click on the link I have shown you the graphs and the charts many times...


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658



The highlights of the paper are:

► The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5-10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.

► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.

► Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.

► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.

The paper:

The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08...made-co2-is-not-the-driver-of-global-warming/
More...
 
jem said:
do you not read... fraudcurrents.

If man made co2 has little influence on atmospheric co2... that destroys the idea that man made co2 is causing warming.


► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
More...


Just stop. No publishing expert denies man made global warming including the authors of this study. We are not Trumpers. We can read. In no way does this joke of a paper which has been roundly dismissed as statistical trash show that man made global warming is not true.

So still waiting. Trolly troll of all trolls.
 
Last edited:
that is a peer reviewed paper with easily reproducible statistical results. its has received high praise by many. (last time I searched google I found only 2 or 3 nutters who had a quarrel with the paper and most of their arguments were really weak.) There have been multiple other papers producing the same results. One paper was done 20 years earlier and it came to the same conclusions. Its the data... its the facts... those are facts not subject to your bullshit. you can reproduce the same results yourself. The stats are basic.

The data in the paper destroys the idea of man made global warming.



Besides... no scientist on your team denies that co2 trails ocean warming and cooling.

futurecurrents said:
Just stop. No publishing expert denies man made global warming including the authors of this study. We are not Trumpers. We can read. In no way does this joke of a paper which has been roundly dismissed as statistical trash show that man made global warming is not true.

So still waiting. Trolly troll of all trolls.
More...
 
Last edited:
jem said:
that is a peer reviewed paper with easily reproducible statistical results. its has received high praise by many. (last time I searched google I found only 2 or 3 nutters who had a quarrel with the paper and most of their arguments were really weak.) There have been multiple other papers producing the same results. One paper was done 20 years earlier and it came to the same conclusions. Its the data... its the facts... those are facts not subject to your bullshit. you can reproduce the same results yourself. The stats are basic.

The data in the paper destroys the idea of man made global warming.



Besides... no scientist on your team denies that co2 trails ocean warming and cooling.
More...


Are you on drugs jem?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top