you are trying that stupidity again...
here is a list on your own favorite website of authors who have published multiples times.
I note the site underreports because I know of others.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/peerreviewedskeptics.php
Why do you bring Curry up again? She has publicly stated that she believes the Earth is warming and that Man is contributing to it.Yet we have provided you with papers and research from the Head of the Climate Department at Georgia Tech (Dr. Judith Curry) and from heads of other top science university Climate Departments showing information expressing clear doubts about global warming.
Somehow all of their peer reviewed papers and the other 1365 are not enough evidence for you. Somehow you don't consider Dr. Curry and other leading scientists who lead climate departments to be "respected climatologists".
Allow me to let you in on something - your Environmental Science degree is not a real hard science degree. You don't even have to take standard high-end math or science courses to get a Environmental Science degree. Environmental Science degrees usually don't even come out of the School of Science - they are more aligned with golf course management and landscaping.
Why do you bring Curry up again? She has publicly stated that she believes the Earth is warming and that Man is contributing to it.
I've already posted a link and a snippet from an interview with her, where she confirms this is her view, in this very thread.Feel free to go read her entire Climate, Etc. blog - https://judithcurry.com/
Come back and tell me where you get your "facts" from. Just because she posts links to all points of view in her blog and invites guest commentary from people on both sides of the issues does not mean she publicly stated that she believes the Earth is warming in any meaningful manner caused by man.
When Humlum and his team publish a paper which shows using data that everyone in the field uses which shows that co2 levels follow changes in ocean temp levels ....
how can you keep lying your fricken ass off.
this is peer reviewed science...
click on the link I have shown you the graphs and the charts many times...
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818112001658
The highlights of the paper are:
► The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5-10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.
► Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.
► Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.
► CO2 released from use of fossil fuels have little influence on the observed changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
The paper:
The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08...made-co2-is-not-the-driver-of-global-warming/
You seem to have a problem with reading comprehension and also writing coherently. In no way do these authors deny man made global warming. Do you think that we are as stupid as Trump? Maybe you are, but not the progressives here. Most of them seem to live outside the US. Which is weird.
No, as in none, as in zero, zilch, zippo, climate expert with multiple peer reviewed published papers, denies man made global warming.