Too bad no credible climate expert agrees with you and they all say you are wrong.
And bottom line, she believes in AGW. Doofus.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Too bad no credible climate expert agrees with you and they all say you are wrong.
And bottom line, she believes in AGW. Doofus.
Too bad no credible climate expert agrees with you and they all say you are wrong.
And bottom line, she believes in AGW. Doofus.
Interesting. In the past you have derided her as a "denier".
What a magical change in position you have bent yourself into. You must be an extreme AGW contortionist.
I read the whole thing. With reservations she believes Man is contributing to global warming.Yeah, too bad he does not quote the rest of what she said, and only takes little portions out of context.
I read the whole thing. With reservations she believes Man is contributing to global warming.
You should look at more complete sources...
Here is another article:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/...e-climate-scientist-judith-curry-interviewed/
You should look at more complete sources...
Here is another article:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/...e-climate-scientist-judith-curry-interviewed/
Yup she gets paid by fossil fuel interests. She said so herself. She's a dumb attention whore.
"Professor Curry, based at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, does not dispute for a moment that human-generated carbon dioxide warms the planet."You should look at more complete sources...
Here is another article:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/11/...e-climate-scientist-judith-curry-interviewed/
Thanks!
Yup she gets paid by fossil fuel interests. She said so herself. She's a dumb attention whore.
Her previous testimony demonstrated that she has never been paid by fossil fuel interests for climate research. Do you have any other absurd assertions that you want to put forward.
"Professor Curry, based at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, does not dispute for a moment that human-generated carbon dioxide warms the planet."
Thanks!
Nice job taking one sentence out of context while leaving out the entire paragraph outlining that warming is not sensitive to CO2, and that warming will not be a problem in 21st century.
The argument that AGW is no big deal is a different argument. If that's where you want to reset our discussion going forward, I'm ok with that. So, you accept that man "made" CO2 is contributing to the planet's warming?warming is not sensitive to CO2, and that warming will not be a problem in 21st century.
The argument that AGW is no big deal is a different argument. If that's where you want to reset our discussion going forward, I'm ok with that. So, you accept that man "made" CO2 is contributing to the planet's warming?
No, I do not. There is not sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that man "made" CO2 is contributing to the planet's warming. AGW is simply a theory, not a finalized conclusion.
It is far more likely that the earth is facing a natural cooling cycle over the next five decades that is dangerous to man.