Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

Her previous testimony demonstrated that she has never been paid by fossil fuel interests for climate research. Do you have any other absurd assertions that you want to put forward.

Holy crap you are confused .......this is the second time I have posted this. You just don't learn do you? It's like your brain can't process info that conflicts with your delusions.



When she was questioned about potential conflicts of interest, this was her response to the Scientific American: [2]

“I do receive some funding from the fossil fuel industry. ..........

http://www.desmogblog.com/judith-curry

 

[gwb-trading]

Holy crap you are confused .......this is the second time I have posted this. You just don't learn do you? It's like your brain can't process info that conflicts with your delusions.



When she was questioned about potential conflicts of interest, this was her response to the Scientific American: [2]

“I do receive some funding from the fossil fuel industry. ..........

http://www.desmogblog.com/judith-curry

Why don't you quote the entire quote.

"“I do receive some funding from the fossil fuel industry. My company…does [short-term] hurricane forecasting…for an oil company, since 2007. During this period I have been both a strong advocate for the IPCC, and more recently a critic of the IPCC, there is no correlation of this funding with my public statements.”


As I stated she has never been paid by fossil fuel interests for climate research.

 

[futurecurrents]

No, I do not. There is not sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that man "made" CO2 is contributing to the planet's warming. AGW is simply a theory, not a finalized conclusion.

It is far more likely that the earth is facing a natural cooling cycle over the next five decades that is dangerous to man.

So then you disagree with Judith Curry. And virtually every climate scientist on the planet.

Why are we even arguing with you? It's like arguing with the crazy shopping cart lady.

 

[Ricter]

No, I do not. There is not sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that man "made" CO2 is contributing to the planet's warming. AGW is simply a theory, not a finalized conclusion.

It is far more likely that the earth is facing a natural cooling cycle over the next five decades that is dangerous to man.

So you think Curry is wrong.

 

[Ricter]

So then you disagree with Judith Curry. And virtually every climate scientist on the planet.

Why are we even arguing with you? It's like arguing with the crazy shopping cart lady.

Which is weird, because he was just leaning on Curry to argue there is no AGW.

 

[gwb-trading]

I agree with Curry that in AGW theory the earth should warm as CO2 increases. I also agree with Curry that AGW theory is unproven, and the sensitivity of temperature to C02 is greatly over-estimated in climate models.

 

[futurecurrents]

Which is weird, because he was just leaning on Curry to argue there is no AGW.

Yeah, I sort of feel sorry him. He's backed himself into a corner and the only way out is a huge blow to his ego. Oh well. I suspect this is the problem with most of the deniers. Cognitive dissonance.

 

[Ricter]

I agree with Curry that in AGW theory the earth should warm as CO2 increases.

But she believes the process is fact. Nothing to worry about, but still a fact.

 

[gwb-trading]

But she believes the process is fact. Nothing to worry about, but still a fact.

She has stated repeatedly that the "climate research" process is completely off the tracks and must be fixed. She states that the reform is only likely to happen in 2030 when wide-spread recognition arrives that the world is cooling and all the models are completely wrong.

 

[Ricter]

She has stated repeatedly that the "climate research" process is completely off the tracks and must be fixed. She states that the reform is only likely to happen in 2030 when wide-spread recognition arrives that the world is cooling and all the models are completely wrong.

But she does not believe the world is cooling. She thinks a cooling will begin in 2030?