Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[gwb-trading]

Well, here we go again... it's Ricter and FC time

 

[futurecurrents]

Blahahahahaha. You post a spin article from the washington post. I previously posted a published peer-reviewed paper from NASA.

Now you think NASA is probably wrong. So, if NASA publishes an article that disagrees with your belief system, they are wrong.

However, if NASA publishes an article that agrees with your belief system it is unequivocally true.

This is a great illustration wrt why there are skeptics. Congratulations! You solidified my beliefs regarding being skeptical.

You have countless times posted that NASA is one of the foremost authorities in the world regarding global warming. Therefore anyone that disagrees with them is a complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job. So which one are you? A complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job?

You cherry picking son-of-a-bitch.

Are you a cherry picker? You look like a cherry picker. NOW GO PICK ME SOME CHERRIES! I am hungry.

Yes, that study is probably wrong. Far more and better studies show the complete opposite.

I understand that you do NOT understand. It's ok.

 

[Ricter]

Blahahahahaha. You post a spin article from the washington post. I previously posted a published peer-reviewed paper from NASA.

Now you think NASA is probably wrong. So, if NASA publishes an article that disagrees with your belief system, they are wrong.

However, if NASA publishes an article that agrees with your belief system it is unequivocally true.

This is a great illustration wrt why there are skeptics. Congratulations! You solidified my beliefs regarding being skeptical.

You have countless times posted that NASA is one of the foremost authorities in the world regarding global warming. Therefore anyone that disagrees with them is a complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job. So which one are you? A complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job?

You cherry picking son-of-a-bitch.

Are you a cherry picker? You look like a cherry picker. NOW GO PICK ME SOME CHERRIES! I am hungry.

But in the end, NASA scientists believe human activity is warming the planet, Antarctica notwithstanding.

 

[WeToddDid2]

But in the end, NASA scientists believe human activity is warming the planet, Antarctica notwithstanding.

One myth is now fact. 9 more to go.

http://www.skepticalscience.com

I have faith that they will figure it out eventually.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Yes, that study is probably wrong. Far more and better studies show the complete opposite.

I understand that you do NOT understand. It's ok.

I understand that you will consider any scientific paper wrong if it does not agree with your belief system regardless who wrote it. However, you may believe it if John Cook wrote the paper.

 

[futurecurrents]

I understand that you will consider any scientific paper wrong if it does not agree with your belief system regardless who wrote it. However, you may believe it if John Cook wrote the paper.

If John Cook wrote about Christian evangelicals I might believe it because he is one. It is this religious background that has spurred him to get out the truth about this looming huge problem for humanity. The deniers are actually evil when looking at the big picture. It is evil to deny the truth of an upcoming disaster.

 

[futurecurrents]

One myth is now fact. 9 more to go.

http://www.skepticalscience.com

I have faith that they will figure it out eventually.

I don't have faith that you will.

 

[WeToddDid2]

I don't have faith that you will.

I know. I know. It is the daily caller.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/28/300-scientists-want-noaa-to-stop-hiding-its-global-warming-data/

300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

Hundreds of scientists sent a letter to lawmakers Thursday warning National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientists may have violated federal laws when they published a 2015 study purporting to eliminate the 15-year “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record.

“We, the undersigned, scientists, engineers, economists and others, who have looked carefully into the effects of carbon dioxide released by human activities, wish to record our support for the efforts of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology to ensure that federal agencies complied with federal guidelines that implemented the Data Quality Act,” some 300 scientists, engineers and other experts wrote to Chairman of the House Science Committee, Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith.

Of the 300 letter signers, 150 had doctorates in a related field. Signers also included: 25 climate or atmospheric scientists, 23 geologists, 18 meteorologists, 51 engineers, 74 physicists, 20 chemists and 12 economists. Additionally, one signer was a Nobel Prize winning physicist and two were astronauts.

I know. I know. It is whatsupwiththat.

List of signatories.

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/signatories_hcsst_20jan2016-1.pdf

Look at that. There is a 100% consensus amongst these scientist that NOAA is lying.

 

[WeToddDid2]

The temps of January through March 2015 were the coldest in a century in New York.

I wonder why that happened.

Go long jackets. It is going to get really cold.

 

[Ricter]

The temps of January through March 2015 were the coldest in a century in New York.

I wonder why that happened.

Go long jackets. It is going to get really cold.

Australia bakes in record early summer heat
Adelaide sets December record of over 40C for days in a row, while other southern cities also bask in high temperatures.

Rob McElwee | 19 Dec 2015 11:35 GMT | Weather, Australia, Heat wave