Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

Let's help you remember some recent history...

NASA Global Warming Stance Blasted By 49 Astronauts, Scientists
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nasa-global-warming-letter-astronauts_n_1418017.html

Is NASA playing fast and loose with climate change science? That's the contention of a group of 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts.


On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.


"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."


The group features some marquee names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.

--------------

Currently there is a bill in Congress to shut down all climate funding for NASA which requires that the climate.nasa.gov website be taken down. I am looking for to the next President signing it into law.

You forgot about the janitors and the Republican NASA food service workers. lol

 

[futurecurrents]

Ricter, you have go with the Republican NASA food service workers for the science of climate change. Get with the program.

 

[Ricter]

Ricter, you have go with the Republican NASA food service workers for the science of climate change. Get with the program.

Haha, funny, but not fair.

 

[WeToddDid2]

You brought them up, are they trustworthy?

Do you think they are trustworthy?

 

[gwb-trading]

Ricter, you have go with the Republican NASA food service workers for the science of climate change. Get with the program.

It's January 28, 2016 and AGW is a failed theory driving poor public policy while mankind is facing an impending natural cold cycle. Get with the program.

P.S. - All the NASA astronauts and scientists who signed the letter are far more accomplished and knowledgeable than you.

 

[Ricter]

Do you think they are trustworthy?

Based on the overreach and disorganization there which gwb has just revealed, no, and neither should you. But... do you trust NASA?

 

[futurecurrents]

Haha, funny, but not fair.

OK then.....NOAA. Get your climate science from them. You wanna go with their Republican boat captains. THEY know the deal.

 

[Ricter]

It's January 28, 2016 and AGW is a failed theory driving poor public policy while mankind is facing an impending natural cold cycle. Get with the program.

P.S. - All the NASA astronauts and scientists who signed the letter are far more accomplished and knowledgeable than you.

And the NASA scientists, among others, who produced this summary are more knowledgeable than you.
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/earth_energy.html

 

[futurecurrents]

And the NASA scientists, among others, who produced this summary are more knowledgeable than you.
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/environment/earth_energy.html

^GWB

 

[WeToddDid2]

The study is probably wrong. The bulk of the evidence and the best satellite data shows that the ice mass is decreasing.

It contradicts numerous prior scientific claims, including a 2012 study in Science by a small army of polar scientists, a study from earlier this year in Earth and Planetary Science Letters (which found 92 gigatons of net losses per year) and this 2014 study in Geophysical Research Letters (160 gigatons of net losses per year). It also contradicts assertions by the leading consensus body of climate science, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which stated in 2013 that Antarctica is “losing mass” and that this process is accelerating. That statement was itself based on multiple studies showing Antarctic ice loss.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ning-ice-heres-why-you-should-stay-skeptical/

Blahahahahaha. You post a spin article from the washington post. I previously posted a published peer-reviewed paper from NASA.

Now you think NASA is probably wrong. So, if NASA publishes an article that disagrees with your belief system, they are wrong.

However, if NASA publishes an article that agrees with your belief system it is unequivocally true.

This is a great illustration wrt why there are skeptics. Congratulations! You solidified my beliefs regarding being skeptical.

You have countless times posted that NASA is one of the foremost authorities in the world regarding global warming. Therefore anyone that disagrees with them is a complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job. So which one are you? A complete dumb ass or a right wing nut job?

You cherry picking son-of-a-bitch.

Are you a cherry picker? You look like a cherry picker. NOW GO PICK ME SOME CHERRIES! I am hungry.