I am not talking about the source, I am referring to your own calculations. They kind of give your level of understanding how statistics work away.
Would it be fair to say that you wouldn’t be adverse to human population “Leveling” off to more “Sustainable” levels? Perhaps through reduced birth rates? As in reduced birth rates through controlled lowering of virility of the general population?
Practical solution, really. Let people live out their lives, while allowing a select few with outstanding attributes reproduce. I could get on board with that. Possibly.
A nicer solution involves better planning and better utilization of resources. If done right, our planet might safely support 20 billion people, although I can imagine emerging viruses having a field day well before we reach that number.
I’d say time to colonize other worlds, but the resources to get three people just into orbit seem enormous.
Aw, hell. Let’s vaccinate all humans into sterility, it would serve those resource hoggers justice!
Amen?
I do not believe so, we will not be able to raise the energy for it.Humans will spread into the universe.
When you say "creature", you mean animals only?Why is there not a single superspecies on Earth, what is the mechanism that prevents only one creature existing?
I do not believe so, we will not be able to raise the energy for it.
I see it as no sweat providing we survive the AI era in a recognisable form. I'm plugged into a lot of science channels through family and the rate at which things are moving from scifi to reality is still impressive.When you say "creature", you mean animals only?
I do not believe so, we will not be able to raise the energy for it.
Just a few weeks ago this was on Drudge.
The scientists I read pretty much guaranteed this was the last step to needed to have fusion energy. MIT Bezos Gates.
---
The new magnet from CFS and MIT is strong enough that when the team builds a its donut-shaped fusion machine, called a tokamak, with these magnets, it will be able to achieve “net energy,” meaning that the fusion machine makes more energy that it takes to initiate and sustain the reaction, CFS and MIT’s PSFC said.
Fusion gets closer with successful test of new kind of magnet