Even Nicki Minaj is Smarter than the Vaccine Cucks

[UsualName]

The entirety of my, and my analysis alone, is based on cdc.gov data. You are welcome to check the accuracy of my calculations.

I find it interesting that you don’t believe my analysis, as it suggests it conflicts with what you apparently believe: Covid is a serious enough pathogen to warrant vaccine mandates.

Catching Covid has risks and vaccines have risks, both short and long term. Vaccines can be justified against pathogens that dangerous to a large portion of the population, such as measles and the like. However, Covid is basically a strong version of the cold and those who are concerned are welcome to get vaccinated as many times as they desire. Those who are not concerned about Covid are also reasonable to not want to get vaccinated.

Government mandates are a violation of personal sovereignty for a virus that represents only moderate risk to the community.

Do the math, think for yourself, then, and only then, can you make an informed decision regarding vaccinations in our over-propagandized world.

Perhaps you are making the same mistake as a viral misinformation post but it is still misleading and improperly analyzed.

For instance for metric of 100,000. What is that 100,000? Is it of all Americans who regardless of vaccination or is it just the unvaccinated like Ms. Minaj is. Because if you’re lumping the two groups together then you are artificially lowering unvaccinated people in her age groups survival rate.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

Perhaps you are making the same mistake as a viral misinformation post but it is still misleading and improperly analyzed.

For instance for metric of 100,000. What is that 100,000? Is it of all Americans who regardless of vaccination or is it just the unvaccinated like Ms. Minaj is. Because if you’re lumping the two groups together then you are artificially lowering unvaccinated people in her age groups survival rate.

I suggest you either reread my post, as I explained by methodology, or perform your own calculations.

You want to be truly informed, don’t you?

 

[UsualName]

I suggest you either reread my post, as I explained by methodology, or perform your own calculations.

You want to be truly informed, don’t you?

My point is your analysis is incomplete and not sophisticated enough to tell the true story. And your rough estimates certainly do not warrant foregoing a safe and effective vaccine because someone’s cousin’s friend has swollen balls.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

My point is your analysis is incomplete and not sophisticated enough to tell the true story. And your rough estimates certainly do not warrant foregoing a safe and effective vaccine because someone’s cousin’s friend has swollen balls.

You are being critical without offering evidence. Then you are trying to defect with “Swollen balls”.

You have a hidden agenda? Or is it simpler, that your ego cannot admit when you have been proven wrong?

Covid mandate debates matter, as the long term health and relative virility of a nation may hang in the balance.

 

[UsualName]

You are being critical without offering evidence. Then you are trying to defect with “Swollen balls”.

You have a hidden agenda? Or is it simpler, that your ego cannot admit when you have been proven wrong?

Covid mandate debates matter, as the long term health and relative virility of a nation may hang in the balance.

I certainly did point to evidence as you can see in my original post. In my second post, I gave you the benefit of the doubt that your personal analysis was similar to a flawed viral analysis that was already disproved.

As far as vaccination mandates, you can file an amicus brief when the law suits are filed.

 

[BeautifulStranger]

I certainly did point to evidence as you can see in my original post. In my second post, I gave you the benefit of the doubt that your personal analysis was similar to a flawed viral analysis that was already disproved.

As far as vaccination mandates, you can file an amicus brief when the law suits are filed.

Ok, I’ll run the numbers again.

 

[jem]

So double it to 4 per 100,000..
(The vax rate is 55% in US and her age group is likely to below .5.)

That number is so small.

Its ridiculous to mandate a temporary vaccine... for which we have no long term data.. which may not prevent infection by future variants.

Its worse than ridiculous...

it is immoral to mess with young healthy peoples immune systems and open them up to all sorts of potential problems...

Ok, I’ll run the numbers again.

 

[Bugenhagen]

So double it to 4 per 100,000..
(The vax rate is 55% in US and her age group is likely to below .5.)

That number is so small.

Its ridiculous to mandate a temporary vaccine... for which we have no long term data.. which may not prevent infection by future variants.

Its worse than ridiculous...

it is immoral to mess with young healthy peoples immune systems and open them up to all sorts of potential problems...

What's immoral is what you are doing chicken little.

 

[UsualName]

So double it to 4 per 100,000..
(The vax rate is 55% in US and her age group is likely to below .5.)

That number is so small.

Its ridiculous to mandate a temporary vaccine... for which we have no long term data.. which may not prevent infection by future variants.

Its worse than ridiculous...

it is immoral to mess with young healthy peoples immune systems and open them up to all sorts of potential problems...

No. Why double the deaths? He wants an analysis of women and unvaccinated death rate in a certain age group. So the population sample should be 100,000 unvaccinated women infected with Covid of a similar age.

Like I said, a lot of this is back of the napkin, neither of you have even brought up confidence intervals.

 

[jem]

its back of the napkin but when the numbers are so low to begin with... its good.

if 55% the US population is vaxxed and its skew older..
Its likely very fair to say about 50% of this minaj population is vaccinated.

you then remove half the population and for the sake of argument state all the deaths occurred in the the non vaxxed population...

So you double the deaths and still see a ridiculously low number.

You can triple the deaths and its still super low.

No. Why double the deaths? He wants an analysis of women and unvaccinated death rate in a certain age group. So the population sample should be 100,000 unvaccinated women infected with Covid of a similar age.

Like I said, a lot of this is back of the napkin, neither of you have even brought up confidence intervals.