No rules on the internet...
There ARE rules in my threads jacko. Kindly fuck off, if you can't follow them.
You asked for intelligent and on topic discussions? I asked for them first.
Now to make this post actually on topic, here is a quite technical discussion from Reddit just why Bitcoin is so slow to change:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6eaior/a_personal_note_to_the_bitcoin_community/
I will quote the best post of it:
">>It does not matter who played a role in this, or why. ...
Agree that the who doesn't matter. The
why on the other hand matters a lot because the outcome may not be as avoidable as it might appear.
Very few users are comfortable entertaining the idea that Bitcoin's serviceable period has expired. The protocol outlined in Satoshi's white paper bestows economic incentives on rule-enforcers and extracts penalties on rule breakers. These incentives can be bypassed when the network is small and the value it represents low. But a very different beast emerges at the end of 7 years of continuous operation and relentless exchange rate growth. That network will fight change relentlessly whatever its source and however well-intentioned.
Moreover, Bitcoin's governance model has evolved in a direction that has become ever less compatible with major protocol changes. Bitcoin was established as a Benevolent Dictatorship under Satoshi. Under his successor, more participants began to have a say in project direction. The block size limit question prompted a short-lived revival of Benevolent Dictator model, which backfired. Half a dozen or so competing implementations now run on the network, reducing the influence once enjoyed by the "Core Developer" role. Alternatives to Bitcoin have very rapidly risen to prominence. Each new entrant goes places that look ever more out of reach for Bitcoin.
This is decentralization. It means massive effort will be required to get your way. It means you're probably going to end up disappointed with how slowly things change."